Research on ecosystem service value and landscape ecological risk prediction and zoning: Taking Fujian province as an example

IF 2.6 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Fan Wang , Yun Wu , Yao Zhang , Jiawei Wang , Zhijie Xue , Xin Tan , Wen Jia
{"title":"Research on ecosystem service value and landscape ecological risk prediction and zoning: Taking Fujian province as an example","authors":"Fan Wang ,&nbsp;Yun Wu ,&nbsp;Yao Zhang ,&nbsp;Jiawei Wang ,&nbsp;Zhijie Xue ,&nbsp;Xin Tan ,&nbsp;Wen Jia","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rapid urbanization drives urban expansion while threatening sustainable development through declining ecosystem service value (ESV) and rising ecological risk (ERI). This study developed an integrated SD-PLUS model combining historical analysis and future projections to evaluate ESV-ERI dynamics, establishing ecological zoning frameworks with policy implications. Using Fujian Province as a testbed, we established a Business-as-Usual (BAU) scenario through historical pattern extrapolation, compliant with EEA technical guidelines to create a policy-neutral baseline. This framework enables quantitative evaluation of anthropogenic regulation effects and early identification of ecological risk thresholds. Our simulations reveal over 15 years, construction land expanded by 48% (1757.42 km²), primarily through forest and farmland conversion. ESV showed initial growth followed by decline, exhibiting southeast-northwest spatial gradients (lower SE, higher NW). Conversely, ERI progressively increased with medium-high risk transitions, displaying inverse spatial concentration (high SE, low NW). Model validation showed strong performance with SD prediction errors &lt;5% and PLUS simulations achieving Kappa=0.90/accuracy=0.94, confirming SD-PLUS effectiveness in land change modeling. Spatial analysis identified four functional ecological zones: 1) expanding strict control zones (high ERI), 2) key control zones showing initial expansion then contraction, 3) stable general control zones, and 4) continuously shrinking ecological protection zones (high ESV). These findings enable targeted spatial governance by aligning economic development with ecological conservation priorities. The integrated methodology provides policymakers with a scientifically robust framework for balancing urban growth with ecosystem preservation, particularly valuable for rapidly developing regions facing similar sustainability challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51043,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Modelling","volume":"507 ","pages":"Article 111173"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380025001589","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rapid urbanization drives urban expansion while threatening sustainable development through declining ecosystem service value (ESV) and rising ecological risk (ERI). This study developed an integrated SD-PLUS model combining historical analysis and future projections to evaluate ESV-ERI dynamics, establishing ecological zoning frameworks with policy implications. Using Fujian Province as a testbed, we established a Business-as-Usual (BAU) scenario through historical pattern extrapolation, compliant with EEA technical guidelines to create a policy-neutral baseline. This framework enables quantitative evaluation of anthropogenic regulation effects and early identification of ecological risk thresholds. Our simulations reveal over 15 years, construction land expanded by 48% (1757.42 km²), primarily through forest and farmland conversion. ESV showed initial growth followed by decline, exhibiting southeast-northwest spatial gradients (lower SE, higher NW). Conversely, ERI progressively increased with medium-high risk transitions, displaying inverse spatial concentration (high SE, low NW). Model validation showed strong performance with SD prediction errors <5% and PLUS simulations achieving Kappa=0.90/accuracy=0.94, confirming SD-PLUS effectiveness in land change modeling. Spatial analysis identified four functional ecological zones: 1) expanding strict control zones (high ERI), 2) key control zones showing initial expansion then contraction, 3) stable general control zones, and 4) continuously shrinking ecological protection zones (high ESV). These findings enable targeted spatial governance by aligning economic development with ecological conservation priorities. The integrated methodology provides policymakers with a scientifically robust framework for balancing urban growth with ecosystem preservation, particularly valuable for rapidly developing regions facing similar sustainability challenges.
生态系统服务价值与景观生态风险预测与区划研究——以福建省为例
快速城市化在推动城市扩张的同时,也通过生态系统服务价值(ESV)的下降和生态风险(ERI)的上升威胁着可持续发展。本研究开发了一个综合SD-PLUS模型,结合历史分析和未来预测来评估ESV-ERI动态,建立具有政策意义的生态区划框架。使用福建省作为测试平台,我们通过历史模式外推建立了一个业务照常(BAU)场景,该场景遵循EEA技术指南来创建一个策略中立的基线。该框架能够定量评估人为调节效应和早期识别生态风险阈值。我们的模拟显示,在过去15年中,建设用地扩大了48%(1757.42平方公里),主要是通过森林和农田转换。ESV呈先增长后下降的趋势,呈现东南-西北的空间梯度(东南低,西北高)。相反,ERI随着中-高风险转变逐渐增加,呈现出相反的空间浓度(高SE,低NW)。模型验证显示,SD预测误差为5%,PLUS模拟Kappa=0.90/精度=0.94,证实了SD-PLUS在土地变化模拟中的有效性。空间分析确定了4个功能生态区:严格控制区不断扩大(高ERI),重点控制区先扩张后收缩,一般控制区稳定,生态保护区不断缩小(高ESV)。这些发现使经济发展与生态保护优先事项保持一致,从而实现有针对性的空间治理。综合方法为政策制定者提供了平衡城市增长与生态系统保护的科学框架,对面临类似可持续性挑战的快速发展地区尤其有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Modelling
Ecological Modelling 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
259
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The journal is concerned with the use of mathematical models and systems analysis for the description of ecological processes and for the sustainable management of resources. Human activity and well-being are dependent on and integrated with the functioning of ecosystems and the services they provide. We aim to understand these basic ecosystem functions using mathematical and conceptual modelling, systems analysis, thermodynamics, computer simulations, and ecological theory. This leads to a preference for process-based models embedded in theory with explicit causative agents as opposed to strictly statistical or correlative descriptions. These modelling methods can be applied to a wide spectrum of issues ranging from basic ecology to human ecology to socio-ecological systems. The journal welcomes research articles, short communications, review articles, letters to the editor, book reviews, and other communications. The journal also supports the activities of the [International Society of Ecological Modelling (ISEM)](http://www.isemna.org/).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信