Cognitive interviewing study to assess the content validity of a Spanish version of the Multiple Sclerosis Health Literacy Questionnaire

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Marina Gonzalez-Del-Rio , Miguel Merchan-Ruiz , Anna Reñé-Reñé , Carme Bertran-Noguer , Lluís Ramió-Torrentà , Edurne Zabaleta-Del-Olmo
{"title":"Cognitive interviewing study to assess the content validity of a Spanish version of the Multiple Sclerosis Health Literacy Questionnaire","authors":"Marina Gonzalez-Del-Rio ,&nbsp;Miguel Merchan-Ruiz ,&nbsp;Anna Reñé-Reñé ,&nbsp;Carme Bertran-Noguer ,&nbsp;Lluís Ramió-Torrentà ,&nbsp;Edurne Zabaleta-Del-Olmo","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2025.105761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To develop a Spanish version of the Multiple Sclerosis Health Literacy Questionnaire (MSHLQ) and assess its content validity from the perspective of people with multiple sclerosis (MS).</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Cognitive interviewing study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used a step-by-step process to translate the MSHLQ into Spanish and employed purposive sampling to achieve a representative sample of the target population. We invited people aged 18 and older with MS who are users of a public healthcare service to participate. We carried out two rounds of interviews, both conducted by the same skilled interviewer. Two coders independently assessed the interview transcriptions using the Question Appraisal System.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirteen interviews were analysed in the first round, reaching saturation. The sample comprised people with MS, with a balanced gender distribution and varied educational backgrounds, and with MS diagnosis durations ranging from 1 to 24 years. Problematic issues found in the pre-final MSHLQ-SPA included 15 out of 22 items. We identified 45 clarity issues and 23 assumption-related problems, plus two overlapping responses. After amendments, only five issues were found in the second round.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Over two-thirds of items in the pre-final MSHLQ-SPA version had problematic issues, mostly clarity-related. This study contributes to the body of evidence regarding MSHLQ content validity, an essential instrument property for ensuring its accurate interpretation and use across different countries or contexts. Tailored health literacy measurement instruments for people with MS have the potential to improve health outcomes and reduce health inequalities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":"245 ","pages":"Article 105761"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350625002070","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To develop a Spanish version of the Multiple Sclerosis Health Literacy Questionnaire (MSHLQ) and assess its content validity from the perspective of people with multiple sclerosis (MS).

Study design

Cognitive interviewing study.

Methods

We used a step-by-step process to translate the MSHLQ into Spanish and employed purposive sampling to achieve a representative sample of the target population. We invited people aged 18 and older with MS who are users of a public healthcare service to participate. We carried out two rounds of interviews, both conducted by the same skilled interviewer. Two coders independently assessed the interview transcriptions using the Question Appraisal System.

Results

Thirteen interviews were analysed in the first round, reaching saturation. The sample comprised people with MS, with a balanced gender distribution and varied educational backgrounds, and with MS diagnosis durations ranging from 1 to 24 years. Problematic issues found in the pre-final MSHLQ-SPA included 15 out of 22 items. We identified 45 clarity issues and 23 assumption-related problems, plus two overlapping responses. After amendments, only five issues were found in the second round.

Conclusions

Over two-thirds of items in the pre-final MSHLQ-SPA version had problematic issues, mostly clarity-related. This study contributes to the body of evidence regarding MSHLQ content validity, an essential instrument property for ensuring its accurate interpretation and use across different countries or contexts. Tailored health literacy measurement instruments for people with MS have the potential to improve health outcomes and reduce health inequalities.
认知访谈研究评估西班牙版多发性硬化症健康素养问卷的内容效度
目的编制西班牙语版《多发性硬化症健康素养问卷》(MSHLQ),并从多发性硬化症(MS)患者的角度评估其内容效度。研究设计认知访谈研究。方法采用循序渐进的方法将MSHLQ翻译成西班牙语,并采用有目的的抽样方法对目标人群进行代表性抽样。我们邀请了18岁及以上的MS患者,他们是公共医疗服务的用户。我们进行了两轮面试,都是由同一个熟练的面试官进行的。两名编码员使用问题评估系统独立评估访谈记录。结果第一轮分析了13个访谈,达到饱和。样本包括多发性硬化症患者,性别分布均衡,教育背景不同,多发性硬化症诊断时间从1年到24年不等。在预定稿MSHLQ-SPA中发现的问题包括22个项目中的15个。我们确定了45个清晰度问题和23个与假设相关的问题,以及两个重叠的回答。修改后,第二轮只发现了5个问题。结论在预定稿的MSHLQ-SPA版本中,超过三分之二的项目存在问题,主要与清晰度有关。本研究为MSHLQ内容效度提供了大量证据,这是确保其在不同国家或背景下准确解释和使用的重要工具属性。为MS患者量身定制的健康素养测量工具有可能改善健康结果并减少健康不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health
Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信