A note on strong cosmic censorship and its violation in Reissner–Nordström de Sitter black hole space-times

IF 3.7 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Anna Chrysostomou, Alan S Cornell, Aldo Deandrea and Seong Chan Park
{"title":"A note on strong cosmic censorship and its violation in Reissner–Nordström de Sitter black hole space-times","authors":"Anna Chrysostomou, Alan S Cornell, Aldo Deandrea and Seong Chan Park","doi":"10.1088/1361-6382/add5b4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Penrose’s strong cosmic censorship (SCC) conjecture safeguards determinism in general relativity (GR). Within the initial value approach to GR, proof of SCC preservation is predicated on the unique evolution of the metric. For the Kerr–Newman family of black hole solutions, this requires the inextendibility of the metric past the Cauchy horizon, due to the development of a ‘blue-shift’ instability. Attempts to provide a rigorous mathematical proof of SCC has led to the formulation of several SCC conjectures of varying strengths, which seem to be discussed rarely outside of the mathematical relativity literature. In this note, we review some of the arguments for and against SCC preservation, with a focus on the Reissner–Nordström de Sitter (RNdS) context, where the positive cosmological constant invites a ‘red-shift’ effect that competes against the ‘blue-shift’. We study the consequent role of quasinormal mode behaviour and illustrate the parameter space for which we consistently observe violations of the SCC conjecture within RNdS black holes.","PeriodicalId":10282,"journal":{"name":"Classical and Quantum Gravity","volume":"151 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Classical and Quantum Gravity","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/add5b4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Penrose’s strong cosmic censorship (SCC) conjecture safeguards determinism in general relativity (GR). Within the initial value approach to GR, proof of SCC preservation is predicated on the unique evolution of the metric. For the Kerr–Newman family of black hole solutions, this requires the inextendibility of the metric past the Cauchy horizon, due to the development of a ‘blue-shift’ instability. Attempts to provide a rigorous mathematical proof of SCC has led to the formulation of several SCC conjectures of varying strengths, which seem to be discussed rarely outside of the mathematical relativity literature. In this note, we review some of the arguments for and against SCC preservation, with a focus on the Reissner–Nordström de Sitter (RNdS) context, where the positive cosmological constant invites a ‘red-shift’ effect that competes against the ‘blue-shift’. We study the consequent role of quasinormal mode behaviour and illustrate the parameter space for which we consistently observe violations of the SCC conjecture within RNdS black holes.
关于在Reissner-Nordström德西特黑洞时空中强宇宙审查及其违反的注释
彭罗斯的强宇宙审查(SCC)猜想保障了广义相对论的决定论。在GR的初始值方法中,SCC保存的证明是基于度量的唯一演化的。对于Kerr-Newman家族的黑洞解,由于“蓝移”不稳定性的发展,这需要度规在柯西视界之外的不可扩展性。为SCC提供严格的数学证明的尝试导致了几种不同强度的SCC猜想的公式,这些猜想似乎很少在数学相对论文献之外进行讨论。在本文中,我们回顾了一些支持和反对SCC保存的论点,重点是Reissner-Nordström德西特(RNdS)背景,其中正宇宙常数引起了与“蓝移”竞争的“红移”效应。我们研究了准正态模式行为的后续作用,并说明了我们在RNdS黑洞中一致观察到SCC猜想违反的参数空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Classical and Quantum Gravity 物理-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
8.60%
发文量
301
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Classical and Quantum Gravity is an established journal for physicists, mathematicians and cosmologists in the fields of gravitation and the theory of spacetime. The journal is now the acknowledged world leader in classical relativity and all areas of quantum gravity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信