A Randomized Controlled Study on the Treatment of Isolated Interdental Intrabony Defects Using the Modified Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique With or Without a Collagen-Enriched Bovine-Derived Xenograft: A 2-Year Analysis.
{"title":"A Randomized Controlled Study on the Treatment of Isolated Interdental Intrabony Defects Using the Modified Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique With or Without a Collagen-Enriched Bovine-Derived Xenograft: A 2-Year Analysis.","authors":"Yuzhe Sun,Haidong Zhang,Churen Zhang,Xiaochi Chang,Hongqiao Zhao,Xiangyu Sun,Pierpaolo Cortellini,Kaining Liu,Jianxia Hou","doi":"10.1111/jcpe.14178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM\r\nThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the modified minimally invasive surgical technique (M-MIST) combined with a collagen-enriched bovine-derived xenograft (CEBDX) for the treatment of isolated interdental intrabony defects.\r\n\r\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\r\nThis is a randomized controlled trial including 40 isolated interdental intrabony defects in 40 patients. The test group received M-MIST and CEBDX, and the control group received M-MIST alone. Re-evaluations were performed 1 and 2 years after surgery, with probing depth (PD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) measured at the buccal/labial and lingual/palatal sides of the defects as at baseline. Periapical radiographs and CBCT were also performed to evaluate the radiographic bone changes of the defects.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThirty-eight defects were evaluated at the 1- and 2-year follow-ups, and both groups showed statistically significant improvements in PD, CAL and radiographic bone volume. The test group exhibited increased PD reduction (3.95 ± 1.39 mm vs. 2.95 ± 1.51 mm, p = 0.041) and CAL gain (3.58 vs. 2.53 mm on average, p = 0.043) at the buccal side of the defects. No difference was found at the lingual side. A significantly greater radiographic bone volume gain (17.77 ± 11.44 mm3 vs. 8.63 ± 7.10 mm3, p = 0.011) was found in the test group at the 2-year follow-up.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nM-MIST was effective both alone and with CEBDX. The addition of CEBDX significantly improved radiographic bone volume gain and PD reduction, and CAL gain at the buccal side of the defects.","PeriodicalId":15380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.14178","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AIM
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the modified minimally invasive surgical technique (M-MIST) combined with a collagen-enriched bovine-derived xenograft (CEBDX) for the treatment of isolated interdental intrabony defects.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This is a randomized controlled trial including 40 isolated interdental intrabony defects in 40 patients. The test group received M-MIST and CEBDX, and the control group received M-MIST alone. Re-evaluations were performed 1 and 2 years after surgery, with probing depth (PD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) measured at the buccal/labial and lingual/palatal sides of the defects as at baseline. Periapical radiographs and CBCT were also performed to evaluate the radiographic bone changes of the defects.
RESULTS
Thirty-eight defects were evaluated at the 1- and 2-year follow-ups, and both groups showed statistically significant improvements in PD, CAL and radiographic bone volume. The test group exhibited increased PD reduction (3.95 ± 1.39 mm vs. 2.95 ± 1.51 mm, p = 0.041) and CAL gain (3.58 vs. 2.53 mm on average, p = 0.043) at the buccal side of the defects. No difference was found at the lingual side. A significantly greater radiographic bone volume gain (17.77 ± 11.44 mm3 vs. 8.63 ± 7.10 mm3, p = 0.011) was found in the test group at the 2-year follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS
M-MIST was effective both alone and with CEBDX. The addition of CEBDX significantly improved radiographic bone volume gain and PD reduction, and CAL gain at the buccal side of the defects.
目的:本研究旨在评价改良微创手术技术(M-MIST)联合富含胶原的牛源异种移植物(CEBDX)治疗孤立牙间骨内缺损的疗效。材料与方法这是一项随机对照试验,包括40例分离的牙间骨内缺损患者。试验组给予M-MIST和CEBDX治疗,对照组单独给予M-MIST治疗。术后1年和2年进行重新评估,测量颊/唇侧和舌/腭侧缺陷的探测深度(PD)和临床附着水平(CAL)。同时行根尖周x线片和CBCT评价缺损的x线骨变化。结果随访1年和2年共发现缺损38例,两组患者PD、CAL和x线片骨体积均有显著改善。试验组颊侧缺陷的PD减小(3.95±1.39 mm vs. 2.95±1.51 mm, p = 0.041)和CAL增益(平均3.58 vs. 2.53 mm, p = 0.043)增加。舌侧无差异。在2年的随访中,实验组的x线骨体积增加(17.77±11.44 mm3 vs. 8.63±7.10 mm3, p = 0.011)显著高于对照组。结论sm - mist单用或联用CEBDX均有较好的疗效。CEBDX的添加显著改善了x线片骨体积增加和PD降低,以及颊侧缺陷的CAL增加。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Periodontology was founded by the British, Dutch, French, German, Scandinavian, and Swiss Societies of Periodontology.
The aim of the Journal of Clinical Periodontology is to provide the platform for exchange of scientific and clinical progress in the field of Periodontology and allied disciplines, and to do so at the highest possible level. The Journal also aims to facilitate the application of new scientific knowledge to the daily practice of the concerned disciplines and addresses both practicing clinicians and academics. The Journal is the official publication of the European Federation of Periodontology but wishes to retain its international scope.
The Journal publishes original contributions of high scientific merit in the fields of periodontology and implant dentistry. Its scope encompasses the physiology and pathology of the periodontium, the tissue integration of dental implants, the biology and the modulation of periodontal and alveolar bone healing and regeneration, diagnosis, epidemiology, prevention and therapy of periodontal disease, the clinical aspects of tooth replacement with dental implants, and the comprehensive rehabilitation of the periodontal patient. Review articles by experts on new developments in basic and applied periodontal science and associated dental disciplines, advances in periodontal or implant techniques and procedures, and case reports which illustrate important new information are also welcome.