{"title":"Anti-Acetylcholine Receptor antibodies in Tear for the Diagnosis of Ocular Myasthenia Gravis.","authors":"Cheng Lu,Yuanting Yang,Yuying Dong,Ting Tang,Jian Chen,Yingwei Wang,Zheng Wu,Qing Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.05.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE\r\nOcular myasthenia gravis (OMG) significantly affects patients' quality of life. However, conventional serum assays often fail to detect anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibodies in more than half of OMG cases, complicating accurate diagnosis. Given the immunological role of tears in the ocular environment, they may serve as a viable alternative for antibody detection. This study investigates the utility of tear-based anti-AChR antibody detection as a diagnostic tool for OMG and compares its performance with that of serum-based cell-based assays (CBAs).\r\n\r\nDESIGN\r\nProspective diagnostic testing validity evaluation.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA total of 65 participants were enrolled, including 52 patients diagnosed with OMG and 13 healthy controls. Anti-AChR antibodies were assessed in both serum and tear samples using CBAs. Diagnostic performance metrics were compared between the two sample types, and correlations between antibody levels and clinical severity were analyzed.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nTear-based CBA demonstrated significantly superior diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.926, P < 0.0001) compared to serum-based CBA (AUC = 0.656, P = 0.0836). The sensitivity of tear CBA was 80.8% (95% CI: 68.1%-89.2%), markedly higher than that of serum CBA at 42.3% (95% CI: 29.9%-55.8%). Among the 42 seronegative OMG patients, 83.3% tested positive using tear CBA, whereas only 40.5% were positive via serum CBA (P < 0.0001). Notably, tear anti-AChR antibody levels did not show a consistent correlation with symptom severity.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nTear-based detection of anti-AChR antibodies offers a non-invasive, highly sensitive diagnostic approach for OMG, particularly beneficial in cases where serum tests are negative. This method holds promise for improving early diagnosis and clinical decision-making in OMG management.","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2025.05.013","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
Ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG) significantly affects patients' quality of life. However, conventional serum assays often fail to detect anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibodies in more than half of OMG cases, complicating accurate diagnosis. Given the immunological role of tears in the ocular environment, they may serve as a viable alternative for antibody detection. This study investigates the utility of tear-based anti-AChR antibody detection as a diagnostic tool for OMG and compares its performance with that of serum-based cell-based assays (CBAs).
DESIGN
Prospective diagnostic testing validity evaluation.
METHODS
A total of 65 participants were enrolled, including 52 patients diagnosed with OMG and 13 healthy controls. Anti-AChR antibodies were assessed in both serum and tear samples using CBAs. Diagnostic performance metrics were compared between the two sample types, and correlations between antibody levels and clinical severity were analyzed.
RESULTS
Tear-based CBA demonstrated significantly superior diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.926, P < 0.0001) compared to serum-based CBA (AUC = 0.656, P = 0.0836). The sensitivity of tear CBA was 80.8% (95% CI: 68.1%-89.2%), markedly higher than that of serum CBA at 42.3% (95% CI: 29.9%-55.8%). Among the 42 seronegative OMG patients, 83.3% tested positive using tear CBA, whereas only 40.5% were positive via serum CBA (P < 0.0001). Notably, tear anti-AChR antibody levels did not show a consistent correlation with symptom severity.
CONCLUSIONS
Tear-based detection of anti-AChR antibodies offers a non-invasive, highly sensitive diagnostic approach for OMG, particularly beneficial in cases where serum tests are negative. This method holds promise for improving early diagnosis and clinical decision-making in OMG management.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and visual science specialists describing clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations. Published monthly since 1884, the full text of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and supplementary material are also presented online at www.AJO.com and on ScienceDirect.
The American Journal of Ophthalmology publishes Full-Length Articles, Perspectives, Editorials, Correspondences, Books Reports and Announcements. Brief Reports and Case Reports are no longer published. We recommend submitting Brief Reports and Case Reports to our companion publication, the American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports.
Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they have not been and will not be published elsewhere substantially in any format, and that there are no ethical problems with the content or data collection. Authors may be requested to produce the data upon which the manuscript is based and to answer expeditiously any questions about the manuscript or its authors.