{"title":"Linguistic and emotional prosody: A systematic review and ALE meta-analysis","authors":"Charalambos Themistocleous","doi":"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Prosody is a cover term referring to the melodic aspects of speech, with linguistic and affective (a.k.a. emotional) meanings. This review provides an overview of linguistic and affective prosody, evaluating two hypotheses on healthy individuals' linguistic and affective prosody. The first hypothesizes that the biological nature of affective prosody triggers activations unrelated to language (biological hypothesis), and the second that the aspects of affective prosody have been grammaticalized, i.e., incorporated into the language (linguistic hypothesis). We employed a systematic ALE metanalytic approach to identify neural correlates of prosody from the literature. Specifically, we assessed papers that report brain coordinates from healthy individuals selected using systematic research from academic databases, such as PubMed (NLM), Scopus, and Web of Science. We found that affective and linguistic prosody activate bilateral frontotemporal regions, like the Superior Temporal Gyrus (STG). A key difference is that affective prosody involves subcortical structures like the amygdala, and linguistic prosody activates linguistic areas and brain areas of social cognition and engagement. The shared activations, therefore, suggest that linguistic and affective meanings are combined, involving shared underlying brain connectivity mechanisms and acoustic manifestations. We suggest that the traditional distinction between linguistic and affective prosody may be overly rigid. Much like speech, lexicon, and grammar—domains that convey affective, social, and linguistic meanings without explicitly reflecting separate categories—prosody, too, functions as a system interfacing with affective, social, and linguistic domains. We conclude by proposing a novel blending hypothesis: prosody should be viewed as an integrated system that serves both affective and linguistic functions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56105,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 106210"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763425002106","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Prosody is a cover term referring to the melodic aspects of speech, with linguistic and affective (a.k.a. emotional) meanings. This review provides an overview of linguistic and affective prosody, evaluating two hypotheses on healthy individuals' linguistic and affective prosody. The first hypothesizes that the biological nature of affective prosody triggers activations unrelated to language (biological hypothesis), and the second that the aspects of affective prosody have been grammaticalized, i.e., incorporated into the language (linguistic hypothesis). We employed a systematic ALE metanalytic approach to identify neural correlates of prosody from the literature. Specifically, we assessed papers that report brain coordinates from healthy individuals selected using systematic research from academic databases, such as PubMed (NLM), Scopus, and Web of Science. We found that affective and linguistic prosody activate bilateral frontotemporal regions, like the Superior Temporal Gyrus (STG). A key difference is that affective prosody involves subcortical structures like the amygdala, and linguistic prosody activates linguistic areas and brain areas of social cognition and engagement. The shared activations, therefore, suggest that linguistic and affective meanings are combined, involving shared underlying brain connectivity mechanisms and acoustic manifestations. We suggest that the traditional distinction between linguistic and affective prosody may be overly rigid. Much like speech, lexicon, and grammar—domains that convey affective, social, and linguistic meanings without explicitly reflecting separate categories—prosody, too, functions as a system interfacing with affective, social, and linguistic domains. We conclude by proposing a novel blending hypothesis: prosody should be viewed as an integrated system that serves both affective and linguistic functions.
韵律是一个涵盖术语,指的是语言的旋律方面,具有语言和情感(又名情感)的含义。本文对语言韵律和情感韵律进行了综述,并对两种关于健康个体语言韵律和情感韵律的假说进行了评价。第一种假说认为,情感韵律的生物学性质触发了与语言无关的激活(生物学假说);第二种假说认为,情感韵律的各个方面已经被语法化,即被纳入语言(语言学假说)。我们采用系统的ALE元分析方法从文献中识别韵律的神经关联。具体地说,我们评估了通过系统研究从学术数据库(如PubMed (NLM)、Scopus和Web of Science)中选择的健康个体的大脑坐标报告。我们发现,情感韵律和语言韵律激活双侧额颞区,如颞上回(STG)。一个关键的区别是,情感韵律涉及杏仁核等皮层下结构,而语言韵律激活语言区域和大脑中社会认知和参与的区域。因此,共同的激活表明,语言和情感意义是结合在一起的,涉及共同的潜在大脑连接机制和声学表现。我们认为,语言韵律和情感韵律之间的传统区别可能过于严格。就像语音、词汇和语法领域(它们传达情感、社会和语言意义,而不明确地反映单独的类别)一样,韵律也作为连接情感、社会和语言领域的系统发挥作用。最后,我们提出了一种新的混合假设:韵律应该被视为一个既具有情感功能又具有语言功能的综合系统。
期刊介绍:
The official journal of the International Behavioral Neuroscience Society publishes original and significant review articles that explore the intersection between neuroscience and the study of psychological processes and behavior. The journal also welcomes articles that primarily focus on psychological processes and behavior, as long as they have relevance to one or more areas of neuroscience.