{"title":"Task-irrelevant features can be ignored in feature-based encoding","authors":"Yao Fu, Heming Gao, Jingyan Jing, Mingming Qi","doi":"10.1016/j.biopsycho.2025.109049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The present study aimed to explore whether individuals could selectively remember task-relevant features while ignoring task-irrelevant features for given items. Participants were initially asked to remember the task-relevant feature of one (low load), two (medium load), or four (high load) items, while ignoring their task-irrelevant features. Participants were required to make responses to the target in the subsequent search task, while being presented with distractors that contained either task-irrelevant or task-relevant features. No features matched with the studied items in the neutral trials. The items’ color was manipulated as a task-relevant feature in Experiment 1, while their shape was designated as a task-irrelevant feature. Conversely, the items’ shape was manipulated as a task-relevant feature in Experiment 2, and their color was designated as task-irrelevant. The event-related potentials evoked by the visual search task were also examined. The results showed that, in both experiments, 1) The response time showed no differences between task-irrelevant trials and neutral trials among different load conditions, suggesting that the task-irrelevant distractors may not slow down the target searching. 2) The magnitude of the target-elicited N2pc was similar between the neutral and the task-irrelevant trials among different load conditions, indicating that the task-irrelevant distractor received no attention and had no effect on the target processing. The results indicated that the task-irrelevant features were suppressed or completely disregarded.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55372,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychology","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 109049"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301051125000675","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The present study aimed to explore whether individuals could selectively remember task-relevant features while ignoring task-irrelevant features for given items. Participants were initially asked to remember the task-relevant feature of one (low load), two (medium load), or four (high load) items, while ignoring their task-irrelevant features. Participants were required to make responses to the target in the subsequent search task, while being presented with distractors that contained either task-irrelevant or task-relevant features. No features matched with the studied items in the neutral trials. The items’ color was manipulated as a task-relevant feature in Experiment 1, while their shape was designated as a task-irrelevant feature. Conversely, the items’ shape was manipulated as a task-relevant feature in Experiment 2, and their color was designated as task-irrelevant. The event-related potentials evoked by the visual search task were also examined. The results showed that, in both experiments, 1) The response time showed no differences between task-irrelevant trials and neutral trials among different load conditions, suggesting that the task-irrelevant distractors may not slow down the target searching. 2) The magnitude of the target-elicited N2pc was similar between the neutral and the task-irrelevant trials among different load conditions, indicating that the task-irrelevant distractor received no attention and had no effect on the target processing. The results indicated that the task-irrelevant features were suppressed or completely disregarded.
期刊介绍:
Biological Psychology publishes original scientific papers on the biological aspects of psychological states and processes. Biological aspects include electrophysiology and biochemical assessments during psychological experiments as well as biologically induced changes in psychological function. Psychological investigations based on biological theories are also of interest. All aspects of psychological functioning, including psychopathology, are germane.
The Journal concentrates on work with human subjects, but may consider work with animal subjects if conceptually related to issues in human biological psychology.