Evaluating School-Based Interventions for Preventing and Reducing Tobacco Use Among Adolescents in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Sahadat Hossain PhD , Harry Tattan-Birch PhD , Emma Beard PhD , Lion Shahab PhD
{"title":"Evaluating School-Based Interventions for Preventing and Reducing Tobacco Use Among Adolescents in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Sahadat Hossain PhD , Harry Tattan-Birch PhD , Emma Beard PhD , Lion Shahab PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2025.107656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Tobacco-related disease and death remain high in many low- and middle-income countries, and most people start using tobacco during adolescence. This study evaluated the effectiveness of school-based interventions in preventing and reducing tobacco use among adolescents in low- and middle-income countries.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Seven databases were searched until 20 April 2024. The primary outcome was tobacco use prevalence (ever or point prevalence) at the longest follow-up. Risk of bias was assessed, and random-effects meta-analyses were conducted, exploring heterogeneity via meta-regression (PROSPERO registration CRD42022330329).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-seven studies (N=57,292) were summarized descriptively, and 20 were meta-analyzed. Most studies were from Brazil (<em>n</em>=5, 18.5%), India (<em>n</em>=5, 18.5%), China (<em>n</em>=3, 11.1%), and Pakistan (<em>n</em>=2, 7.4%); 12 (44.4%) assessed newly developed and 15 (55.6%) culturally adapted existing interventions; and over half (<em>n</em>=14, 51.9%) focused solely on preventing and reducing tobacco use while the rest addressed multiple behaviors. Overall, interventions reduced adolescent tobacco use (OR=0.76, 95% CI=0.64, 0.91; I²=47%; <em>n</em>=20; 50,056 participants). Stratification by outcome measure showed significant reductions in point prevalence (OR=0.69, 95% CI=0.57, 0.85; I²=32.4%). After adjusting for study duration, interventions with higher contact time had lower effectiveness than shorter interventions (AOR=1.36, 95% CI=1.01, 1.84; <em>p</em>=0.045; I²=22%). Low risk of bias studies demonstrated lower odds of tobacco use among participants (OR=0.66, 95% CI=0.50, 0.87; I²=14%; n=6).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>School-based interventions in low- and middle-income countries effectively reduce the proportion of adolescents who use tobacco. Shorter interventions appeared to be effective, suggesting that brief yet engaging interventions may offer practical advantages and could contribute to addressing the tobacco epidemic in low- and middle-income countries. Further research is needed to determine optimal intervention duration and intensity for sustained effectiveness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":"69 2","pages":"Article 107656"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749379725001485","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Tobacco-related disease and death remain high in many low- and middle-income countries, and most people start using tobacco during adolescence. This study evaluated the effectiveness of school-based interventions in preventing and reducing tobacco use among adolescents in low- and middle-income countries.
Methods
Seven databases were searched until 20 April 2024. The primary outcome was tobacco use prevalence (ever or point prevalence) at the longest follow-up. Risk of bias was assessed, and random-effects meta-analyses were conducted, exploring heterogeneity via meta-regression (PROSPERO registration CRD42022330329).
Results
Twenty-seven studies (N=57,292) were summarized descriptively, and 20 were meta-analyzed. Most studies were from Brazil (n=5, 18.5%), India (n=5, 18.5%), China (n=3, 11.1%), and Pakistan (n=2, 7.4%); 12 (44.4%) assessed newly developed and 15 (55.6%) culturally adapted existing interventions; and over half (n=14, 51.9%) focused solely on preventing and reducing tobacco use while the rest addressed multiple behaviors. Overall, interventions reduced adolescent tobacco use (OR=0.76, 95% CI=0.64, 0.91; I²=47%; n=20; 50,056 participants). Stratification by outcome measure showed significant reductions in point prevalence (OR=0.69, 95% CI=0.57, 0.85; I²=32.4%). After adjusting for study duration, interventions with higher contact time had lower effectiveness than shorter interventions (AOR=1.36, 95% CI=1.01, 1.84; p=0.045; I²=22%). Low risk of bias studies demonstrated lower odds of tobacco use among participants (OR=0.66, 95% CI=0.50, 0.87; I²=14%; n=6).
Discussion
School-based interventions in low- and middle-income countries effectively reduce the proportion of adolescents who use tobacco. Shorter interventions appeared to be effective, suggesting that brief yet engaging interventions may offer practical advantages and could contribute to addressing the tobacco epidemic in low- and middle-income countries. Further research is needed to determine optimal intervention duration and intensity for sustained effectiveness.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Preventive Medicine is the official journal of the American College of Preventive Medicine and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research. It publishes articles in the areas of prevention research, teaching, practice and policy. Original research is published on interventions aimed at the prevention of chronic and acute disease and the promotion of individual and community health.
Of particular emphasis are papers that address the primary and secondary prevention of important clinical, behavioral and public health issues such as injury and violence, infectious disease, women''s health, smoking, sedentary behaviors and physical activity, nutrition, diabetes, obesity, and substance use disorders. Papers also address educational initiatives aimed at improving the ability of health professionals to provide effective clinical prevention and public health services. Papers on health services research pertinent to prevention and public health are also published. The journal also publishes official policy statements from the two co-sponsoring organizations, review articles, media reviews, and editorials. Finally, the journal periodically publishes supplements and special theme issues devoted to areas of current interest to the prevention community.