{"title":"Composite dietary antioxidant index of antioxidant vitamins and sarcopenia risk: insights from the UK biobank and NHANES cohorts.","authors":"HuiMin Liu, YuDi Xu, QingSheng Li, LingFei Yang, Xuan Yang, KaiXin Wang, Zhe Gong, Qiang Zhang, YanJie Jia","doi":"10.1186/s12986-025-00945-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The composite dietary antioxidant index (CDAI), reflecting total dietary intake of antioxidant vitamins, may indicate overall antioxidant capacity. This study examined its association with the risk of probable sarcopenia, defined by handgrip strength, in older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants aged over 60 from the UK Biobank (N = 22,921) and National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Surveys (NHANES) 2011-2014 (N = 2,641) cohorts were categorized into probable sarcopenia and non-probable sarcopenia groups. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed the associations between CDAI (both continuous and quartile) and its components (vitamin A, vitamin C, vitamin E, and carotene) with probable sarcopenia risk in cohorts, with sex subgroup and sensitivity analyses to validate results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median (interquartile range) of CDAI was -0.39 (-1.88, 1.45) in the UK Biobank and -0.57 (-1.60, 0.84) in NHANES, respectively. A higher CDAI was significantly associated with a lower risk of probable sarcopenia in both cohorts. Specifically, each one-unit increase in CDAI was associated with a 2% decrease in the odds of probable sarcopenia in the UK Biobank (OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.97-0.998, p = 0.027) and a 13.5% decrease in NHANES (OR = 0.865, 95% CI = 0.75-0.997, p = 0.045), after full adjustment under the Sarcopenia Definition and Outcomes Consortium (SDOC) criteria. In quartile analyses, the risk of probable sarcopenia tended to decrease across higher CDAI quartiles, although the dose-response trend was not strictly linear. In the UK Biobank, multivariable-adjusted odds ratios (95% CIs) across increasing CDAI quartiles were: Q1 (reference), Q2 = 0.87 (0.78-0.97), Q3 = 0.91 (0.81-1.01), and Q4 = 0.86 (0.77-0.96). In NHANES, the trend was more pronounced: Q1 (reference), Q2 = 0.47 (0.24-0.94), Q3 = 0.39 (0.19-0.82), and Q4 = 0.46 (0.22-0.95). Additionally, higher dietary intake of carotene, one of the key antioxidant components, was independently associated with a lower risk of probable sarcopenia in both cohorts. Subgroup analyses indicated an inverse association between CDAI and probable sarcopenia risk in females across both cohorts, whereas no significant association was observed in males. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increased dietary intake of antioxidant vitamins may reduce the risk of probable sarcopenia in older adults, emphasizing the need for targeted prevention strategies. Further research on underlying mechanisms and sex differences is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":19196,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition & Metabolism","volume":"22 1","pages":"44"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12083039/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12986-025-00945-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The composite dietary antioxidant index (CDAI), reflecting total dietary intake of antioxidant vitamins, may indicate overall antioxidant capacity. This study examined its association with the risk of probable sarcopenia, defined by handgrip strength, in older adults.
Methods: Participants aged over 60 from the UK Biobank (N = 22,921) and National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Surveys (NHANES) 2011-2014 (N = 2,641) cohorts were categorized into probable sarcopenia and non-probable sarcopenia groups. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed the associations between CDAI (both continuous and quartile) and its components (vitamin A, vitamin C, vitamin E, and carotene) with probable sarcopenia risk in cohorts, with sex subgroup and sensitivity analyses to validate results.
Results: The median (interquartile range) of CDAI was -0.39 (-1.88, 1.45) in the UK Biobank and -0.57 (-1.60, 0.84) in NHANES, respectively. A higher CDAI was significantly associated with a lower risk of probable sarcopenia in both cohorts. Specifically, each one-unit increase in CDAI was associated with a 2% decrease in the odds of probable sarcopenia in the UK Biobank (OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.97-0.998, p = 0.027) and a 13.5% decrease in NHANES (OR = 0.865, 95% CI = 0.75-0.997, p = 0.045), after full adjustment under the Sarcopenia Definition and Outcomes Consortium (SDOC) criteria. In quartile analyses, the risk of probable sarcopenia tended to decrease across higher CDAI quartiles, although the dose-response trend was not strictly linear. In the UK Biobank, multivariable-adjusted odds ratios (95% CIs) across increasing CDAI quartiles were: Q1 (reference), Q2 = 0.87 (0.78-0.97), Q3 = 0.91 (0.81-1.01), and Q4 = 0.86 (0.77-0.96). In NHANES, the trend was more pronounced: Q1 (reference), Q2 = 0.47 (0.24-0.94), Q3 = 0.39 (0.19-0.82), and Q4 = 0.46 (0.22-0.95). Additionally, higher dietary intake of carotene, one of the key antioxidant components, was independently associated with a lower risk of probable sarcopenia in both cohorts. Subgroup analyses indicated an inverse association between CDAI and probable sarcopenia risk in females across both cohorts, whereas no significant association was observed in males. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings.
Conclusions: Increased dietary intake of antioxidant vitamins may reduce the risk of probable sarcopenia in older adults, emphasizing the need for targeted prevention strategies. Further research on underlying mechanisms and sex differences is warranted.
期刊介绍:
Nutrition & Metabolism publishes studies with a clear focus on nutrition and metabolism with applications ranging from nutrition needs, exercise physiology, clinical and population studies, as well as the underlying mechanisms in these aspects.
The areas of interest for Nutrition & Metabolism encompass studies in molecular nutrition in the context of obesity, diabetes, lipedemias, metabolic syndrome and exercise physiology. Manuscripts related to molecular, cellular and human metabolism, nutrient sensing and nutrient–gene interactions are also in interest, as are submissions that have employed new and innovative strategies like metabolomics/lipidomics or other omic-based biomarkers to predict nutritional status and metabolic diseases.
Key areas we wish to encourage submissions from include:
-how diet and specific nutrients interact with genes, proteins or metabolites to influence metabolic phenotypes and disease outcomes;
-the role of epigenetic factors and the microbiome in the pathogenesis of metabolic diseases and their influence on metabolic responses to diet and food components;
-how diet and other environmental factors affect epigenetics and microbiota; the extent to which genetic and nongenetic factors modify personal metabolic responses to diet and food compositions and the mechanisms involved;
-how specific biologic networks and nutrient sensing mechanisms attribute to metabolic variability.