Giovanna D’Abbronzo , Giuseppe Scidà , Cinzia Quaglia, Angela A Rivellese, Lutgarda Bozzetto, Giovanni Annuzzi, Marilena Vitale
{"title":"Application-Based Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Provides Accurate Body Composition Parameters in a More Cost-Efficient and Time-Efficient Way","authors":"Giovanna D’Abbronzo , Giuseppe Scidà , Cinzia Quaglia, Angela A Rivellese, Lutgarda Bozzetto, Giovanni Annuzzi, Marilena Vitale","doi":"10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.05.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In clinical practice, there is an increasing demand for methods that provide accurate, precise, and real-time body composition measurements while reducing costs and data collection time.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the validity of an application-based bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) system for determining body composition compared with a standard BIA method.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 109 individuals with type 1 diabetes (56 men and 53 women), aged 18–70 y, with a body mass index of 25.0–35.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and glycated hemoglobin concentrations of 7.0%–9.0%, were recruited. Participants were randomly assigned to start with either the application-based BIA system or the standard method (A-wave BIA quantum-V) and then switched to the other method. Anthropometric parameters, blood pressure, and metabolic profiles were also assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The comparison between the 2 methods showed a negligible difference in resistance but a significant difference in reactance (–4.9%). The degree of consistency was excellent for both resistance [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.990, <em>P</em> < 0.001] and reactance (ICC = 0.903, <em>P</em> < 0.001), with individual differences falling within acceptable ranges. Furthermore, body composition parameters, including fat-free mass, fat mass, skeletal muscle mass, total body water, and extracellular water, showed only minor and nonsignificant differences between the 2 methods.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings suggest that the application-based BIA system is a valid and reliable tool for assessing body composition, offering healthcare professionals, including dietitians and nutritionists, a cost-effective and time-efficient alternative to standard BIA methods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16620,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition","volume":"155 7","pages":"Pages 2443-2448"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022316625002950","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
In clinical practice, there is an increasing demand for methods that provide accurate, precise, and real-time body composition measurements while reducing costs and data collection time.
Objectives
This study aimed to evaluate the validity of an application-based bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) system for determining body composition compared with a standard BIA method.
Methods
A total of 109 individuals with type 1 diabetes (56 men and 53 women), aged 18–70 y, with a body mass index of 25.0–35.0 kg/m2 and glycated hemoglobin concentrations of 7.0%–9.0%, were recruited. Participants were randomly assigned to start with either the application-based BIA system or the standard method (A-wave BIA quantum-V) and then switched to the other method. Anthropometric parameters, blood pressure, and metabolic profiles were also assessed.
Results
The comparison between the 2 methods showed a negligible difference in resistance but a significant difference in reactance (–4.9%). The degree of consistency was excellent for both resistance [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.990, P < 0.001] and reactance (ICC = 0.903, P < 0.001), with individual differences falling within acceptable ranges. Furthermore, body composition parameters, including fat-free mass, fat mass, skeletal muscle mass, total body water, and extracellular water, showed only minor and nonsignificant differences between the 2 methods.
Conclusions
These findings suggest that the application-based BIA system is a valid and reliable tool for assessing body composition, offering healthcare professionals, including dietitians and nutritionists, a cost-effective and time-efficient alternative to standard BIA methods.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Nutrition (JN/J Nutr) publishes peer-reviewed original research papers covering all aspects of experimental nutrition in humans and other animal species; special articles such as reviews and biographies of prominent nutrition scientists; and issues, opinions, and commentaries on controversial issues in nutrition. Supplements are frequently published to provide extended discussion of topics of special interest.