Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures in Spine Surgery.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Brynn Charron, Maia Ross, Patrick Thornley
{"title":"Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures in Spine Surgery.","authors":"Brynn Charron, Maia Ross, Patrick Thornley","doi":"10.1007/s12178-025-09981-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) represent a valuable means of assessing the impact of spine surgery on various aspects of patient function and quality of life. This review highlights the most common and contemporary PROMs used in degenerative cervical and lumbar spine conditions, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, and adult spinal deformity.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Available PROMs differ in their comprehensiveness, flexibility, and ease of use, as well as their ability to provide prognostic information. Condition-specific PROMs such as the Scoliosis Research Society-22 and Modified Japanese Orthopedic Association offer the benefit of prompts tailored to capture the unique considerations for a particular disease state, while more generalized metrics such as the Short-Form 36 facilitate widespread PROM standardization permitting comparison between disease states and interventions. Newer PROMS such as the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System and the Patient Generated Index offer benefits due to their generalizable yet adaptable format, conferring them the potential to capture condition-specific factors while still permitting comparison between diseases. However, these instruments require further adaptations and validation prior to widespread implementation to fully realize these advantages. Many PROMs are available for use in the spine surgery population, each with unique benefits and drawbacks, necessitating careful evaluation when selecting PROMs for research use.</p>","PeriodicalId":10950,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"491-503"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12361016/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-025-09981-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) represent a valuable means of assessing the impact of spine surgery on various aspects of patient function and quality of life. This review highlights the most common and contemporary PROMs used in degenerative cervical and lumbar spine conditions, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, and adult spinal deformity.

Recent findings: Available PROMs differ in their comprehensiveness, flexibility, and ease of use, as well as their ability to provide prognostic information. Condition-specific PROMs such as the Scoliosis Research Society-22 and Modified Japanese Orthopedic Association offer the benefit of prompts tailored to capture the unique considerations for a particular disease state, while more generalized metrics such as the Short-Form 36 facilitate widespread PROM standardization permitting comparison between disease states and interventions. Newer PROMS such as the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System and the Patient Generated Index offer benefits due to their generalizable yet adaptable format, conferring them the potential to capture condition-specific factors while still permitting comparison between diseases. However, these instruments require further adaptations and validation prior to widespread implementation to fully realize these advantages. Many PROMs are available for use in the spine surgery population, each with unique benefits and drawbacks, necessitating careful evaluation when selecting PROMs for research use.

脊柱外科患者报告的结果测量。
综述目的:患者报告的预后指标(PROMs)是评估脊柱手术对患者功能和生活质量各方面影响的一种有价值的手段。这篇综述强调了在退行性颈椎和腰椎疾病、青少年特发性脊柱侧凸和成人脊柱畸形中最常见和当代的PROMs。最新发现:现有的PROMs在全面性、灵活性和易用性以及提供预后信息的能力方面存在差异。特定条件PROM,如脊柱侧凸研究协会-22和修改日本骨科协会,提供了针对特定疾病状态的独特考虑而定制的提示的好处,而更广义的指标,如简表36,促进了广泛的PROM标准化,允许比较疾病状态和干预措施。较新的PROMS,如患者报告结果测量信息系统和患者生成指数,由于其可推广但适应性强的格式,使它们有可能捕获特定条件的因素,同时仍然允许疾病之间的比较。然而,在广泛实施之前,这些工具需要进一步调整和验证,以充分实现这些优势。许多prom可用于脊柱外科人群,每个都有独特的优点和缺点,在选择用于研究用途的prom时需要仔细评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: This journal intends to review the most significant recent developments in the field of musculoskeletal medicine. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by expert world-renowned authors, the journal aims to serve all those involved in the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of musculoskeletal-related conditions. We accomplish this aim by appointing authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as rehabilitation of the knee and hip, sports medicine, trauma, pediatrics, health policy, customization in arthroplasty, and rheumatology. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. We also provide commentaries from well-known figures in the field, and an Editorial Board of more than 20 diverse members suggests topics of special interest to their country/region and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信