{"title":"EXPRESS: The self-consistency effect seen on the Dot Perspective Task: Perspective taking or attention cueing?","authors":"Huan Jiang, Mengjie Liu, Xinru Wang, Yating Chen, Yuyan Gao, Binjie Yang, Zhou Qiang","doi":"10.1177/17470218251346447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Some studies suggest that people automatically adopt others' perspectives without realizing it, based on the Dot Perspective Task. In this task, participants and a virtual person may see the same or different numbers of red dots, and participants judge the number of dots more quickly when the numbers match, known as the self-consistency effect. However, it remains unclear whether this effect truly stems from implicit perspective-taking or from a domain-general attentional cueing mechanism. This study conducted two experiments to explore this mechanism. Experiment 1 utilized visual adaptation to examine whether persons, arrows, and fans shared the same task mechanism. Results showed that fans, despite lacking social attributes, exhibit the same task mechanisms as person and arrows due to their directional cues. Experiment 2 employed eye-tracking to further compare person and fan tasks, revealing that fans also produced the self-consistency effect and exhibit the same eye movement patterns as person. Overall, these findings indicate that attentional cueing may play a more crucial role in the Dot Perspective Task, and the accuracy of the task in measuring implicit perspective taking abilities remains a topic for further consideration.</p>","PeriodicalId":20869,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"17470218251346447"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251346447","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Some studies suggest that people automatically adopt others' perspectives without realizing it, based on the Dot Perspective Task. In this task, participants and a virtual person may see the same or different numbers of red dots, and participants judge the number of dots more quickly when the numbers match, known as the self-consistency effect. However, it remains unclear whether this effect truly stems from implicit perspective-taking or from a domain-general attentional cueing mechanism. This study conducted two experiments to explore this mechanism. Experiment 1 utilized visual adaptation to examine whether persons, arrows, and fans shared the same task mechanism. Results showed that fans, despite lacking social attributes, exhibit the same task mechanisms as person and arrows due to their directional cues. Experiment 2 employed eye-tracking to further compare person and fan tasks, revealing that fans also produced the self-consistency effect and exhibit the same eye movement patterns as person. Overall, these findings indicate that attentional cueing may play a more crucial role in the Dot Perspective Task, and the accuracy of the task in measuring implicit perspective taking abilities remains a topic for further consideration.
期刊介绍:
Promoting the interests of scientific psychology and its researchers, QJEP, the journal of the Experimental Psychology Society, is a leading journal with a long-standing tradition of publishing cutting-edge research. Several articles have become classic papers in the fields of attention, perception, learning, memory, language, and reasoning. The journal publishes original articles on any topic within the field of experimental psychology (including comparative research). These include substantial experimental reports, review papers, rapid communications (reporting novel techniques or ground breaking results), comments (on articles previously published in QJEP or on issues of general interest to experimental psychologists), and book reviews. Experimental results are welcomed from all relevant techniques, including behavioural testing, brain imaging and computational modelling.
QJEP offers a competitive publication time-scale. Accepted Rapid Communications have priority in the publication cycle and usually appear in print within three months. We aim to publish all accepted (but uncorrected) articles online within seven days. Our Latest Articles page offers immediate publication of articles upon reaching their final form.
The journal offers an open access option called Open Select, enabling authors to meet funder requirements to make their article free to read online for all in perpetuity. Authors also benefit from a broad and diverse subscription base that delivers the journal contents to a world-wide readership. Together these features ensure that the journal offers authors the opportunity to raise the visibility of their work to a global audience.