EXPRESS: The self-consistency effect seen on the Dot Perspective Task: Perspective taking or attention cueing?

IF 1.5 3区 心理学 Q4 PHYSIOLOGY
Huan Jiang, Mengjie Liu, Xinru Wang, Yating Chen, Yuyan Gao, Binjie Yang, Zhou Qiang
{"title":"EXPRESS: The self-consistency effect seen on the Dot Perspective Task: Perspective taking or attention cueing?","authors":"Huan Jiang, Mengjie Liu, Xinru Wang, Yating Chen, Yuyan Gao, Binjie Yang, Zhou Qiang","doi":"10.1177/17470218251346447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Some studies suggest that people automatically adopt others' perspectives without realizing it, based on the Dot Perspective Task. In this task, participants and a virtual person may see the same or different numbers of red dots, and participants judge the number of dots more quickly when the numbers match, known as the self-consistency effect. However, it remains unclear whether this effect truly stems from implicit perspective-taking or from a domain-general attentional cueing mechanism. This study conducted two experiments to explore this mechanism. Experiment 1 utilized visual adaptation to examine whether persons, arrows, and fans shared the same task mechanism. Results showed that fans, despite lacking social attributes, exhibit the same task mechanisms as person and arrows due to their directional cues. Experiment 2 employed eye-tracking to further compare person and fan tasks, revealing that fans also produced the self-consistency effect and exhibit the same eye movement patterns as person. Overall, these findings indicate that attentional cueing may play a more crucial role in the Dot Perspective Task, and the accuracy of the task in measuring implicit perspective taking abilities remains a topic for further consideration.</p>","PeriodicalId":20869,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"17470218251346447"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251346447","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Some studies suggest that people automatically adopt others' perspectives without realizing it, based on the Dot Perspective Task. In this task, participants and a virtual person may see the same or different numbers of red dots, and participants judge the number of dots more quickly when the numbers match, known as the self-consistency effect. However, it remains unclear whether this effect truly stems from implicit perspective-taking or from a domain-general attentional cueing mechanism. This study conducted two experiments to explore this mechanism. Experiment 1 utilized visual adaptation to examine whether persons, arrows, and fans shared the same task mechanism. Results showed that fans, despite lacking social attributes, exhibit the same task mechanisms as person and arrows due to their directional cues. Experiment 2 employed eye-tracking to further compare person and fan tasks, revealing that fans also produced the self-consistency effect and exhibit the same eye movement patterns as person. Overall, these findings indicate that attentional cueing may play a more crucial role in the Dot Perspective Task, and the accuracy of the task in measuring implicit perspective taking abilities remains a topic for further consideration.

点透视任务的自洽效应:透视还是注意提示?
一些基于Dot透视任务的研究表明,人们会在没有意识到的情况下自动接受他人的观点。在这个任务中,参与者和虚拟人可能会看到相同或不同数量的红点,当数字匹配时,参与者会更快地判断出红点的数量,这被称为自一致性效应。然而,目前尚不清楚这种影响是否真的源于内隐的观点采取或来自领域一般注意提示机制。本研究通过两个实验来探讨这一机制。实验1利用视觉适应来检验人、箭和扇是否具有相同的任务机制。结果表明,尽管粉丝缺乏社交属性,但由于其方向线索,他们表现出与人和箭相同的任务机制。实验2采用眼动追踪进一步比较了人与粉丝任务,发现粉丝也产生了自洽效应,并表现出与人相同的眼动模式。总的来说,这些发现表明注意提示可能在点透视任务中发挥更重要的作用,并且该任务在测量内隐透视能力方面的准确性仍有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Promoting the interests of scientific psychology and its researchers, QJEP, the journal of the Experimental Psychology Society, is a leading journal with a long-standing tradition of publishing cutting-edge research. Several articles have become classic papers in the fields of attention, perception, learning, memory, language, and reasoning. The journal publishes original articles on any topic within the field of experimental psychology (including comparative research). These include substantial experimental reports, review papers, rapid communications (reporting novel techniques or ground breaking results), comments (on articles previously published in QJEP or on issues of general interest to experimental psychologists), and book reviews. Experimental results are welcomed from all relevant techniques, including behavioural testing, brain imaging and computational modelling. QJEP offers a competitive publication time-scale. Accepted Rapid Communications have priority in the publication cycle and usually appear in print within three months. We aim to publish all accepted (but uncorrected) articles online within seven days. Our Latest Articles page offers immediate publication of articles upon reaching their final form. The journal offers an open access option called Open Select, enabling authors to meet funder requirements to make their article free to read online for all in perpetuity. Authors also benefit from a broad and diverse subscription base that delivers the journal contents to a world-wide readership. Together these features ensure that the journal offers authors the opportunity to raise the visibility of their work to a global audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信