Evaluation of direct oral provocation test results in mild cutaneous reactions to cephalosporins in children.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Fatma Nur Kuzucu, Cankat Genis, Ahmet Selmanoglu, Kezban Ipek Demir, Zeynep Sengul Emeksiz, Emine Dibek Misirlioglu
{"title":"Evaluation of direct oral provocation test results in mild cutaneous reactions to cephalosporins in children.","authors":"Fatma Nur Kuzucu, Cankat Genis, Ahmet Selmanoglu, Kezban Ipek Demir, Zeynep Sengul Emeksiz, Emine Dibek Misirlioglu","doi":"10.2500/aap.2025.46.250011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Cephalosporins are beta-lactam antibiotics commonly used in children and are the second most common cause of drug hypersensitivity reactions after penicillins. Antibiotic allergy is diagnosed by tests such as prick and intradermal skin tests and the drug provocation test (DPT). Skin tests can be challenging for both patients and clinicians. In appropriate cases, omitting these tests in favour of direct DPT may help to avoid diagnostic delays. <b>Objective:</b> Our study aimed to evaluate the results of direct DPT in children with a history of mild cutaneous reactions to cephalosporins. <b>Methods:</b> Between 2019 and 2024, pediatric patients with a documented history of mild cutaneous reactions to cephalosporins who underwent direct DPT without prior prick or intradermal skin testing were included in this study conducted at our clinic. Patients with systemic manifestations beyond cutaneous reactions at the time of the index reaction were excluded from the study. <b>Results:</b> The study included 128 patients who underwent direct DPT with cephalosporins. The most commonly suspected drugs were cefixime (45.3%), cefdinir (25.8%) and cefuroxime (18%). While 96.1% did not react, cephalosporin allergy was confirmed in 3.9% but all reactions were limited to skin involvement and none more severe than the index reaction. <b>Conclusion:</b> In our study, direct DPT ruled out suspected allergy in 96.1% of patients with a history of mild skin reactions to cephalosporins. In conclusion, direct oral DPT was found to be a safe and feasible approach for patients with isolated mild skin reactions, effectively bypassing the need for skin testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":7646,"journal":{"name":"Allergy and asthma proceedings","volume":"46 3","pages":"235-239"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy and asthma proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2025.46.250011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cephalosporins are beta-lactam antibiotics commonly used in children and are the second most common cause of drug hypersensitivity reactions after penicillins. Antibiotic allergy is diagnosed by tests such as prick and intradermal skin tests and the drug provocation test (DPT). Skin tests can be challenging for both patients and clinicians. In appropriate cases, omitting these tests in favour of direct DPT may help to avoid diagnostic delays. Objective: Our study aimed to evaluate the results of direct DPT in children with a history of mild cutaneous reactions to cephalosporins. Methods: Between 2019 and 2024, pediatric patients with a documented history of mild cutaneous reactions to cephalosporins who underwent direct DPT without prior prick or intradermal skin testing were included in this study conducted at our clinic. Patients with systemic manifestations beyond cutaneous reactions at the time of the index reaction were excluded from the study. Results: The study included 128 patients who underwent direct DPT with cephalosporins. The most commonly suspected drugs were cefixime (45.3%), cefdinir (25.8%) and cefuroxime (18%). While 96.1% did not react, cephalosporin allergy was confirmed in 3.9% but all reactions were limited to skin involvement and none more severe than the index reaction. Conclusion: In our study, direct DPT ruled out suspected allergy in 96.1% of patients with a history of mild skin reactions to cephalosporins. In conclusion, direct oral DPT was found to be a safe and feasible approach for patients with isolated mild skin reactions, effectively bypassing the need for skin testing.

评价直接口服激发试验结果对头孢菌素轻度皮肤反应的儿童。
背景:头孢菌素是儿童常用的β -内酰胺类抗生素,是仅次于青霉素类的药物过敏反应的第二大常见原因。抗生素过敏是通过诸如点刺和皮内皮肤试验以及药物激发试验(DPT)等试验来诊断的。皮肤测试对患者和临床医生都具有挑战性。在适当情况下,省略这些检查而采用直接DPT可能有助于避免诊断延误。目的:我们的研究旨在评估有轻度头孢菌素皮肤反应史的儿童直接DPT的结果。方法:在2019年至2024年期间,在我们诊所进行的这项研究中纳入了对头孢菌素有轻度皮肤反应史的儿童患者,这些患者在没有事先点刺或皮内皮肤试验的情况下直接接受了DPT。在指数反应发生时出现皮肤反应以外的全身表现的患者被排除在研究之外。结果:本研究纳入了128例使用头孢菌素直接DPT的患者。最常见的疑似药物为头孢克肟(45.3%)、头孢地尼(25.8%)和头孢呋辛(18%)。96.1%的患者无反应,3.9%的患者有头孢菌素过敏,但所有反应仅限于皮肤受累,没有比指数反应更严重的反应。结论:在我们的研究中,96.1%有轻度头孢菌素皮肤反应史的患者直接DPT排除疑似过敏。综上所述,对于孤立性轻度皮肤反应的患者,直接口服DPT是一种安全可行的方法,有效地绕过了皮肤试验的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
35.70%
发文量
106
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Allergy & Asthma Proceedings is a peer reviewed publication dedicated to distributing timely scientific research regarding advancements in the knowledge and practice of allergy, asthma and immunology. Its primary readership consists of allergists and pulmonologists. The goal of the Proceedings is to publish articles with a predominantly clinical focus which directly impact quality of care for patients with allergic disease and asthma. Featured topics include asthma, rhinitis, sinusitis, food allergies, allergic skin diseases, diagnostic techniques, allergens, and treatment modalities. Published material includes peer-reviewed original research, clinical trials and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信