A comparative analysis of sarcopenia screening methods in Thai people with type 2 diabetes mellitus in an outpatient setting.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Ornpicha Laohajaroensombat, Thanapat Limpaarayakul, Nattapol Sathavarodom, Apussanee Boonyavarakul, Parinya Samakkarnthai
{"title":"A comparative analysis of sarcopenia screening methods in Thai people with type 2 diabetes mellitus in an outpatient setting.","authors":"Ornpicha Laohajaroensombat, Thanapat Limpaarayakul, Nattapol Sathavarodom, Apussanee Boonyavarakul, Parinya Samakkarnthai","doi":"10.1186/s12877-025-06020-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is closely linked with sarcopenia. The lack of validated, easy, and effective sarcopenia screening tools for people with T2DM may result in underdiagnosis, delayed interventions, and worsening outcomes. This study evaluated and compared the diagnostic accuracy of various sarcopenia screening tools in T2DM outpatients.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted on 329 people with T2DM at Phramongkutklao Hospital, Thailand, between December 2023 and November 2024. This study compared eight sarcopenia screening tools. The Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 (AWGS 2019) criteria served as the reference standard. Sensitivity, Specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The optimal cutoffs were identified with the Youden index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of sarcopenia was 23.7%. Calf circumference showed the highest diagnostic accuracy at standard cutoff (AUC: 0.892), with optimised cutoff points of < 37.0 cm for males and < 36.0 cm for females, and achieved high sensitivity (90.1% for males, 91.1% for females) with acceptable specificity (77.2% for males, 67.8% for females). Neck circumference demonstrated diagnostic utility (AUC: 0.741) with proposed thresholds of < 39.5 cm (males) and < 36.5 cm (females), yielding moderate sensitivity (69.7% for males, 82.2% for females) and acceptable specificity (78.9% for males, 62.6% for females). Questionnaire-based tools showed limited diagnostic accuracy with SARC-CalF performing the best (AUC: 0.789, sensitivity: 48.7%, specificity: 93.2%). Among physical performance tests, handgrip strength was the most accurate (AUC: 0.716), although these tests generally exhibited high sensitivity, but lower specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Calf circumference was the most effective screening tool for sarcopenia in people with T2DM. Neck circumference emerged as a promising alternative at optimal cutoff values, offering a simple, novel and practice screening tool option. These findings support the implementation of anthropometric measures for sarcopenia screening in clinical settings, particularly in outpatient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"346"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12082904/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-06020-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is closely linked with sarcopenia. The lack of validated, easy, and effective sarcopenia screening tools for people with T2DM may result in underdiagnosis, delayed interventions, and worsening outcomes. This study evaluated and compared the diagnostic accuracy of various sarcopenia screening tools in T2DM outpatients.

Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 329 people with T2DM at Phramongkutklao Hospital, Thailand, between December 2023 and November 2024. This study compared eight sarcopenia screening tools. The Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 (AWGS 2019) criteria served as the reference standard. Sensitivity, Specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The optimal cutoffs were identified with the Youden index.

Results: The prevalence of sarcopenia was 23.7%. Calf circumference showed the highest diagnostic accuracy at standard cutoff (AUC: 0.892), with optimised cutoff points of < 37.0 cm for males and < 36.0 cm for females, and achieved high sensitivity (90.1% for males, 91.1% for females) with acceptable specificity (77.2% for males, 67.8% for females). Neck circumference demonstrated diagnostic utility (AUC: 0.741) with proposed thresholds of < 39.5 cm (males) and < 36.5 cm (females), yielding moderate sensitivity (69.7% for males, 82.2% for females) and acceptable specificity (78.9% for males, 62.6% for females). Questionnaire-based tools showed limited diagnostic accuracy with SARC-CalF performing the best (AUC: 0.789, sensitivity: 48.7%, specificity: 93.2%). Among physical performance tests, handgrip strength was the most accurate (AUC: 0.716), although these tests generally exhibited high sensitivity, but lower specificity.

Conclusion: Calf circumference was the most effective screening tool for sarcopenia in people with T2DM. Neck circumference emerged as a promising alternative at optimal cutoff values, offering a simple, novel and practice screening tool option. These findings support the implementation of anthropometric measures for sarcopenia screening in clinical settings, particularly in outpatient care.

泰国2型糖尿病患者骨骼肌减少症筛查方法的比较分析
背景:2型糖尿病(T2DM)与肌肉减少症密切相关。缺乏有效、简便、有效的2型糖尿病患者肌肉减少症筛查工具可能导致诊断不足、干预延迟和预后恶化。本研究评估并比较了各种肌肉减少症筛查工具在T2DM门诊患者中的诊断准确性。方法:研究人员于2023年12月至2024年11月在泰国Phramongkutklao医院对329名2型糖尿病患者进行了横断面研究。本研究比较了8种肌肉减少症筛查工具。亚洲肌肉减少症工作组2019 (AWGS 2019)标准作为参考标准。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析评估敏感性、特异性和诊断准确性。用约登指数确定了最佳截止点。结果:骨骼肌减少症患病率为23.7%。结论:小腿围是2型糖尿病患者肌少症最有效的筛查工具。颈围作为一种有希望的最佳临界值选择,提供了简单、新颖和实用的筛查工具选择。这些发现支持在临床环境中,特别是在门诊治疗中,对肌肉减少症进行人体测量筛查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信