Emerging and legacy per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances from offshore oilfields and receiving water in China.

IF 7.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Yumeng Wang, Hong Chen, Qinghui Xing, Xuemei Xu
{"title":"Emerging and legacy per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances from offshore oilfields and receiving water in China.","authors":"Yumeng Wang, Hong Chen, Qinghui Xing, Xuemei Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.envres.2025.121865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are extensively utilized as oilfield production chemicals and aqueous film-forming foams (AFFFs) in oilfields. A comprehensive investigation was undertaken to analyze twenty per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), including three emerging PFASs in drill cuttings, slurry and produced water from offshore oilfields in three main sea areas of China. The investigation results were further compared with those in their receiving water. The concentration ranges of ΣPFASs in drill cuttings, slurry as well as produced water were 1049-3473 ng/g and 81.9 ng/L-2090 ng/L, respectively. In comparison, the concentrations range of PFASs in receiving water was 46.2-99.7 ng/L. Both sodium p-perfluorous nonenoxybenzenesulfonate (OBS) and hexafluoropropylene oxide dimer acid (HFPO-DA) were identified as the predominant PFASs detected at elevated concentrations in drilling cuttings, slurry, and produced water, demonstrating their extensive utilization in such environments. HFPO-DA and OBS concentrations in produced water exceeded those in receiving water by 1-2 orders of magnitude. Principal component analysis (PCA) analyses revealed that the compositions of PFASs in the receiving water samples exhibited significant similarity to those in drill cuttings, slurry and produced water from oilfields. It was indicated that discharges from oilfields were the primary contributors of PFASs in their receiving water. In 60-96% of samples from produced water in the Bohai Sea and South China Sea oilfields, as well as receiving water adjacent to the Bohai Sea oilfields, the risk quotient (RQ) of HFPO-DA ranged 0.1-1, indicating moderate ecological risks to aquatic organisms. In contrast, legacy PFASs generally showed lower risk levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":312,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research","volume":" ","pages":"121865"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2025.121865","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are extensively utilized as oilfield production chemicals and aqueous film-forming foams (AFFFs) in oilfields. A comprehensive investigation was undertaken to analyze twenty per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), including three emerging PFASs in drill cuttings, slurry and produced water from offshore oilfields in three main sea areas of China. The investigation results were further compared with those in their receiving water. The concentration ranges of ΣPFASs in drill cuttings, slurry as well as produced water were 1049-3473 ng/g and 81.9 ng/L-2090 ng/L, respectively. In comparison, the concentrations range of PFASs in receiving water was 46.2-99.7 ng/L. Both sodium p-perfluorous nonenoxybenzenesulfonate (OBS) and hexafluoropropylene oxide dimer acid (HFPO-DA) were identified as the predominant PFASs detected at elevated concentrations in drilling cuttings, slurry, and produced water, demonstrating their extensive utilization in such environments. HFPO-DA and OBS concentrations in produced water exceeded those in receiving water by 1-2 orders of magnitude. Principal component analysis (PCA) analyses revealed that the compositions of PFASs in the receiving water samples exhibited significant similarity to those in drill cuttings, slurry and produced water from oilfields. It was indicated that discharges from oilfields were the primary contributors of PFASs in their receiving water. In 60-96% of samples from produced water in the Bohai Sea and South China Sea oilfields, as well as receiving water adjacent to the Bohai Sea oilfields, the risk quotient (RQ) of HFPO-DA ranged 0.1-1, indicating moderate ecological risks to aquatic organisms. In contrast, legacy PFASs generally showed lower risk levels.

中国海上油田和接收水的新兴和遗留的全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质。
全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFASs)作为油田生产化学品和含水成膜泡沫(afff)在油田中得到了广泛的应用。对中国三个主要海域海上油田的钻屑、泥浆和采出水中的20种全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFASs)进行了全面调查分析,其中包括3种新兴的全氟烷基物质。并将调查结果与接收水体进行了比较。钻屑、泥浆和采出水中ΣPFASs的浓度范围分别为1049 ~ 3473 ng/g和81.9 ng/L ~ 2090 ng/L。接收水中PFASs的浓度范围为46.2 ~ 99.7 ng/L。对全氟壬烯氧苯磺酸钠(OBS)和六氟环氧丙烷二聚酸(HFPO-DA)是钻井岩屑、泥浆和采出水中检测到的浓度较高的主要全氟磺酸钠,表明它们在此类环境中被广泛利用。采出水中HFPO-DA和OBS浓度比接收水中高1-2个数量级。主成分分析(PCA)表明,接收水样中全氟辛烷磺酸的组成与钻屑、泥浆和油田采出水中的全氟辛烷磺酸具有显著的相似性。结果表明,油田污水是采收水中全氟磺酸的主要来源。在渤海、南海油田采出水及邻近渤海油田采出水的60 ~ 96%样本中,HFPO-DA的风险商(RQ)为0.1-1,对水生生物的生态风险为中等。相比之下,遗留的PFASs通常显示出较低的风险水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Research
Environmental Research 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
8.40%
发文量
2480
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: The Environmental Research journal presents a broad range of interdisciplinary research, focused on addressing worldwide environmental concerns and featuring innovative findings. Our publication strives to explore relevant anthropogenic issues across various environmental sectors, showcasing practical applications in real-life settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信