Edita Aksamitiene, Jaena Park, Marina Marjanovic, Stephen A. Boppart
{"title":"Defining Biological Variability, Analytical Precision and Quantitative Biophysiochemical Characterization of Human Urinary Extracellular Vesicles","authors":"Edita Aksamitiene, Jaena Park, Marina Marjanovic, Stephen A. Boppart","doi":"10.1002/jev2.70087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The magnitude of combined analytical errors of urinary extracellular vesicle (uEV) preparation and measurement techniques (CV<sub>A</sub>) has not been thoroughly investigated to determine whether it exceeds biological variations. We utilized technical replicates of human urine to assess the repeatability of uEV concentration and size measurements by nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) following differential velocity centrifugation (DC), silicon carbide, or polyethylene glycol uEV isolation methods. The DC method attained the highest precision. Consequently, DC-derived uEV size, most abundant protein levels, and optical redox ratio (ORR) were further assessed by dynamic light scattering (DLS), immunoblotting or multi-photon (SLAM) microscopy. Procedural errors primarily affected uEV counting and uEV-associated protein quantification, while instrumental errors contributed most to the total variability of NTA- and DLS-mediated uEV sizing processes. The intra-individual variability (CV<sub>I</sub>) of uEV counts assessed by NTA was smaller than inter-individual variability (CV<sub>G</sub>), resulting in an estimated index of individuality IOI < 0.6, suggesting that personalized reference interval (RI) is more suitable for interpretation of changes in subject's test results. Population-based RI was more appropriate for ORR (IOI > 1.4). The analytical performance of DC-NTA and DC-SLAM techniques met optimal CV<sub>A</sub> < 0.5 × CV<sub>I</sub> criteria, indicating their suitability for further testing in clinical laboratory settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15811,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Extracellular Vesicles","volume":"14 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jev2.70087","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Extracellular Vesicles","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jev2.70087","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The magnitude of combined analytical errors of urinary extracellular vesicle (uEV) preparation and measurement techniques (CVA) has not been thoroughly investigated to determine whether it exceeds biological variations. We utilized technical replicates of human urine to assess the repeatability of uEV concentration and size measurements by nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) following differential velocity centrifugation (DC), silicon carbide, or polyethylene glycol uEV isolation methods. The DC method attained the highest precision. Consequently, DC-derived uEV size, most abundant protein levels, and optical redox ratio (ORR) were further assessed by dynamic light scattering (DLS), immunoblotting or multi-photon (SLAM) microscopy. Procedural errors primarily affected uEV counting and uEV-associated protein quantification, while instrumental errors contributed most to the total variability of NTA- and DLS-mediated uEV sizing processes. The intra-individual variability (CVI) of uEV counts assessed by NTA was smaller than inter-individual variability (CVG), resulting in an estimated index of individuality IOI < 0.6, suggesting that personalized reference interval (RI) is more suitable for interpretation of changes in subject's test results. Population-based RI was more appropriate for ORR (IOI > 1.4). The analytical performance of DC-NTA and DC-SLAM techniques met optimal CVA < 0.5 × CVI criteria, indicating their suitability for further testing in clinical laboratory settings.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Extracellular Vesicles is an open access research publication that focuses on extracellular vesicles, including microvesicles, exosomes, ectosomes, and apoptotic bodies. It serves as the official journal of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and aims to facilitate the exchange of data, ideas, and information pertaining to the chemistry, biology, and applications of extracellular vesicles. The journal covers various aspects such as the cellular and molecular mechanisms of extracellular vesicles biogenesis, technological advancements in their isolation, quantification, and characterization, the role and function of extracellular vesicles in biology, stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles and their biology, as well as the application of extracellular vesicles for pharmacological, immunological, or genetic therapies.
The Journal of Extracellular Vesicles is widely recognized and indexed by numerous services, including Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS Previews, Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS), Current Contents/Life Sciences, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, Google Scholar, ProQuest Natural Science Collection, ProQuest SciTech Collection, SciTech Premium Collection, PubMed Central/PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, ScienceOpen, and Scopus.