Defining Biological Variability, Analytical Precision and Quantitative Biophysiochemical Characterization of Human Urinary Extracellular Vesicles

IF 14.5 1区 医学 Q1 CELL BIOLOGY
Edita Aksamitiene, Jaena Park, Marina Marjanovic, Stephen A. Boppart
{"title":"Defining Biological Variability, Analytical Precision and Quantitative Biophysiochemical Characterization of Human Urinary Extracellular Vesicles","authors":"Edita Aksamitiene,&nbsp;Jaena Park,&nbsp;Marina Marjanovic,&nbsp;Stephen A. Boppart","doi":"10.1002/jev2.70087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The magnitude of combined analytical errors of urinary extracellular vesicle (uEV) preparation and measurement techniques (CV<sub>A</sub>) has not been thoroughly investigated to determine whether it exceeds biological variations. We utilized technical replicates of human urine to assess the repeatability of uEV concentration and size measurements by nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) following differential velocity centrifugation (DC), silicon carbide, or polyethylene glycol uEV isolation methods. The DC method attained the highest precision. Consequently, DC-derived uEV size, most abundant protein levels, and optical redox ratio (ORR) were further assessed by dynamic light scattering (DLS), immunoblotting or multi-photon (SLAM) microscopy. Procedural errors primarily affected uEV counting and uEV-associated protein quantification, while instrumental errors contributed most to the total variability of NTA- and DLS-mediated uEV sizing processes. The intra-individual variability (CV<sub>I</sub>) of uEV counts assessed by NTA was smaller than inter-individual variability (CV<sub>G</sub>), resulting in an estimated index of individuality IOI &lt; 0.6, suggesting that personalized reference interval (RI) is more suitable for interpretation of changes in subject's test results. Population-based RI was more appropriate for ORR (IOI &gt; 1.4). The analytical performance of DC-NTA and DC-SLAM techniques met optimal CV<sub>A</sub> &lt; 0.5 × CV<sub>I</sub> criteria, indicating their suitability for further testing in clinical laboratory settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15811,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Extracellular Vesicles","volume":"14 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jev2.70087","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Extracellular Vesicles","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jev2.70087","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The magnitude of combined analytical errors of urinary extracellular vesicle (uEV) preparation and measurement techniques (CVA) has not been thoroughly investigated to determine whether it exceeds biological variations. We utilized technical replicates of human urine to assess the repeatability of uEV concentration and size measurements by nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) following differential velocity centrifugation (DC), silicon carbide, or polyethylene glycol uEV isolation methods. The DC method attained the highest precision. Consequently, DC-derived uEV size, most abundant protein levels, and optical redox ratio (ORR) were further assessed by dynamic light scattering (DLS), immunoblotting or multi-photon (SLAM) microscopy. Procedural errors primarily affected uEV counting and uEV-associated protein quantification, while instrumental errors contributed most to the total variability of NTA- and DLS-mediated uEV sizing processes. The intra-individual variability (CVI) of uEV counts assessed by NTA was smaller than inter-individual variability (CVG), resulting in an estimated index of individuality IOI < 0.6, suggesting that personalized reference interval (RI) is more suitable for interpretation of changes in subject's test results. Population-based RI was more appropriate for ORR (IOI > 1.4). The analytical performance of DC-NTA and DC-SLAM techniques met optimal CVA < 0.5 × CVI criteria, indicating their suitability for further testing in clinical laboratory settings.

Abstract Image

定义人类尿细胞外囊泡的生物变异、分析精度和定量生物理化特征
尿细胞外囊泡(uEV)制备和测量技术(CVA)的综合分析误差的大小尚未被彻底调查,以确定它是否超过生物变异。我们利用人类尿液的技术重复来评估纳米颗粒跟踪分析(NTA)在差速离心(DC)、碳化硅或聚乙二醇uEV分离方法下uEV浓度和尺寸测量的可重复性。直流电法测量精度最高。因此,通过动态光散射(DLS)、免疫印迹(immunoblotting)或多光子(SLAM)显微镜进一步评估dc衍生的uEV大小、最丰富蛋白水平和光学氧化还原比(ORR)。程序错误主要影响uEV计数和uEV相关蛋白定量,而仪器错误对NTA和dls介导的uEV大小过程的总变异性贡献最大。NTA评估的uEV计数的个体内变异性(CVI)小于个体间变异性(CVG),从而得出个体IOI <的估计指数;0.6,表明个性化参考区间(RI)更适合解释受试者测试结果的变化。基于人群的RI更适合于ORR (IOI >;1.4)。DC-NTA和DC-SLAM技术的分析性能满足最优CVA <;0.5 × CVI标准,表明其适合在临床实验室环境中进一步检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Cell Biology
CiteScore
27.30
自引率
4.40%
发文量
115
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Extracellular Vesicles is an open access research publication that focuses on extracellular vesicles, including microvesicles, exosomes, ectosomes, and apoptotic bodies. It serves as the official journal of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and aims to facilitate the exchange of data, ideas, and information pertaining to the chemistry, biology, and applications of extracellular vesicles. The journal covers various aspects such as the cellular and molecular mechanisms of extracellular vesicles biogenesis, technological advancements in their isolation, quantification, and characterization, the role and function of extracellular vesicles in biology, stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles and their biology, as well as the application of extracellular vesicles for pharmacological, immunological, or genetic therapies. The Journal of Extracellular Vesicles is widely recognized and indexed by numerous services, including Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS Previews, Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS), Current Contents/Life Sciences, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, Google Scholar, ProQuest Natural Science Collection, ProQuest SciTech Collection, SciTech Premium Collection, PubMed Central/PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, ScienceOpen, and Scopus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信