Three Latent Factors in Major Depressive Disorder Base on Functional Connectivity Show Different Treatment Preferences

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Xinyi Wang, Xinruo Wei, Junneng Shao, Li Xue, Zhilu Chen, Zhijian Yao, Qing Lu
{"title":"Three Latent Factors in Major Depressive Disorder Base on Functional Connectivity Show Different Treatment Preferences","authors":"Xinyi Wang,&nbsp;Xinruo Wei,&nbsp;Junneng Shao,&nbsp;Li Xue,&nbsp;Zhilu Chen,&nbsp;Zhijian Yao,&nbsp;Qing Lu","doi":"10.1002/hbm.70215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The heterogeneity of major depressive disorder (MDD) complicates the selection of effective treatments. While more studies have identified cluster-based MDD subtypes, they often overlook individual variability within subtypes. To address this, we applied latent dirichlet allocation to decompose resting-state functional connectivity (FC) into latent factors. It allows patients to express varying degrees of FC across multiple factors, retaining inter-individual variability. We enrolled 226 patients and 100 healthy controls to identify latent factors and examine their distinct patterns of hyper- and hypo-connectivity. We investigated the association between these connectivity patterns and treatment preferences. Additionally, we compared demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, and longitudinal symptom improvements across the identified factors. We identified three factors. Factor 1, characterized by inter-network hyperconnectivity of the default mode network (DMN), was associated with treatment response to antidepressant monotherapy. Additionally, factor 1 was more frequently expressed by younger and highly educated patients, with significant improvements in cognitive symptoms. Conversely, factor 3, characterized by inter-networks and intra-networks hypoconnectivity of DMN, was associated with treatment response when combining antidepressants with stimulation therapy. Factor 2, characterized by global hypoconnectivity without DMN, was associated with higher baseline depression severity and anxiety symptoms. These three factors showed distinct treatment preferences and clinical characteristics. Importantly, our results suggested that patients with DMN hyperconnectivity benefited from monotherapy, while those with DMN hypoconnectivity benefited from combined treatments. Our approach allows for a unique composition of factors in each individual, potentially facilitating the development of more personalized treatment-related biomarkers.</p>","PeriodicalId":13019,"journal":{"name":"Human Brain Mapping","volume":"46 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hbm.70215","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Brain Mapping","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.70215","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The heterogeneity of major depressive disorder (MDD) complicates the selection of effective treatments. While more studies have identified cluster-based MDD subtypes, they often overlook individual variability within subtypes. To address this, we applied latent dirichlet allocation to decompose resting-state functional connectivity (FC) into latent factors. It allows patients to express varying degrees of FC across multiple factors, retaining inter-individual variability. We enrolled 226 patients and 100 healthy controls to identify latent factors and examine their distinct patterns of hyper- and hypo-connectivity. We investigated the association between these connectivity patterns and treatment preferences. Additionally, we compared demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, and longitudinal symptom improvements across the identified factors. We identified three factors. Factor 1, characterized by inter-network hyperconnectivity of the default mode network (DMN), was associated with treatment response to antidepressant monotherapy. Additionally, factor 1 was more frequently expressed by younger and highly educated patients, with significant improvements in cognitive symptoms. Conversely, factor 3, characterized by inter-networks and intra-networks hypoconnectivity of DMN, was associated with treatment response when combining antidepressants with stimulation therapy. Factor 2, characterized by global hypoconnectivity without DMN, was associated with higher baseline depression severity and anxiety symptoms. These three factors showed distinct treatment preferences and clinical characteristics. Importantly, our results suggested that patients with DMN hyperconnectivity benefited from monotherapy, while those with DMN hypoconnectivity benefited from combined treatments. Our approach allows for a unique composition of factors in each individual, potentially facilitating the development of more personalized treatment-related biomarkers.

基于功能连通性的重度抑郁症三种潜在因素表现出不同的治疗偏好
重度抑郁障碍(MDD)的异质性使有效治疗的选择复杂化。虽然更多的研究已经确定了基于集群的MDD亚型,但它们往往忽略了亚型中的个体变异性。为了解决这个问题,我们应用潜在狄利克雷分配将静息状态功能连接(FC)分解为潜在因素。它允许患者在多个因素中表达不同程度的FC,保留个体间的可变性。我们招募了226名患者和100名健康对照者,以确定潜在因素,并检查他们不同的高连接和低连接模式。我们调查了这些连接模式和治疗偏好之间的关系。此外,我们比较了人口统计学特征、临床症状和确定因素之间的纵向症状改善。我们确定了三个因素。以默认模式网络(DMN)的网络间超连通性为特征的因子1与抗抑郁药单一疗法的治疗反应有关。此外,因子1在年轻和受过高等教育的患者中更常表达,认知症状有显著改善。相反,以DMN网络间和网络内低连通性为特征的因子3与抗抑郁药与刺激治疗联合使用时的治疗反应有关。以无DMN的整体连通性低下为特征的因子2与较高的基线抑郁严重程度和焦虑症状相关。这三个因素表现出不同的治疗偏好和临床特点。重要的是,我们的结果表明,DMN超连通性患者受益于单一治疗,而DMN低连通性患者受益于联合治疗。我们的方法允许每个个体的独特因素组成,潜在地促进了更多个性化治疗相关生物标志物的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Brain Mapping
Human Brain Mapping 医学-核医学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
401
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Brain Mapping publishes peer-reviewed basic, clinical, technical, and theoretical research in the interdisciplinary and rapidly expanding field of human brain mapping. The journal features research derived from non-invasive brain imaging modalities used to explore the spatial and temporal organization of the neural systems supporting human behavior. Imaging modalities of interest include positron emission tomography, event-related potentials, electro-and magnetoencephalography, magnetic resonance imaging, and single-photon emission tomography. Brain mapping research in both normal and clinical populations is encouraged. Article formats include Research Articles, Review Articles, Clinical Case Studies, and Technique, as well as Technological Developments, Theoretical Articles, and Synthetic Reviews. Technical advances, such as novel brain imaging methods, analyses for detecting or localizing neural activity, synergistic uses of multiple imaging modalities, and strategies for the design of behavioral paradigms and neural-systems modeling are of particular interest. The journal endorses the propagation of methodological standards and encourages database development in the field of human brain mapping.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信