{"title":"On-farm assessment and demonstration of best management practices for direct-seeded rice in Timor-Leste","authors":"Yusaku Goto, Taisuke Egusa, Yuji Yamasaki, Virender Kumar, Takeshi Sato, Yoichiro Kato","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Direct-seeded rice (<i>Oryza sativa</i>) cultivation (DSR) is gradually replacing transplanted rice cultivation (TPR) across tropical Asia owing to labor shortages. However, the yields in DSR are lower than those in TPR under current farmer practices (FPs). It would be useful to introduce best management practices (BMPs), holistic technology packages prepared by researchers and extension staff, to improve DSR yield. We aimed at quantifying the effect of BMPs application on the on-farm yield, input factors (labor requirements and production costs), and cost–benefit performance of DSR and comparing it with the results of TPR. On-farm trials were conducted for 2 years in Timor-Leste (East Timor) and categorized farmers into a 2 × 2 experimental design: farmers who used FPs in DSR, BMPs in DSR, FPs in TPR, or BMPs in TPR. There were no significant yield differences between DSR and TPR under BMPs (3.5 vs. 3.6 t ha<sup>−1</sup>), but DSR produced a 20% lower yield than TPR under FPs (2.4 vs. 3.0 t ha<sup>−1</sup>). Yield increases due to BMPs were greater in DSR (+46%) than in TPR (+20%). The benefit–cost ratio of BMPs in DSR was 21% higher than that of BMPs in TPR (1.48 vs. 1.22). DSR farmers can achieve yields similar to those of TPR farmers by applying BMPs, with less labor and lower production costs, even where subsistence farming prevails. The effects of BMPs on DSR and TPR in this study suggest that the BMPs could improve land and labor productivities through DSR in tropical agricultural development programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70083","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70083","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Direct-seeded rice (Oryza sativa) cultivation (DSR) is gradually replacing transplanted rice cultivation (TPR) across tropical Asia owing to labor shortages. However, the yields in DSR are lower than those in TPR under current farmer practices (FPs). It would be useful to introduce best management practices (BMPs), holistic technology packages prepared by researchers and extension staff, to improve DSR yield. We aimed at quantifying the effect of BMPs application on the on-farm yield, input factors (labor requirements and production costs), and cost–benefit performance of DSR and comparing it with the results of TPR. On-farm trials were conducted for 2 years in Timor-Leste (East Timor) and categorized farmers into a 2 × 2 experimental design: farmers who used FPs in DSR, BMPs in DSR, FPs in TPR, or BMPs in TPR. There were no significant yield differences between DSR and TPR under BMPs (3.5 vs. 3.6 t ha−1), but DSR produced a 20% lower yield than TPR under FPs (2.4 vs. 3.0 t ha−1). Yield increases due to BMPs were greater in DSR (+46%) than in TPR (+20%). The benefit–cost ratio of BMPs in DSR was 21% higher than that of BMPs in TPR (1.48 vs. 1.22). DSR farmers can achieve yields similar to those of TPR farmers by applying BMPs, with less labor and lower production costs, even where subsistence farming prevails. The effects of BMPs on DSR and TPR in this study suggest that the BMPs could improve land and labor productivities through DSR in tropical agricultural development programs.
在亚洲热带地区,由于劳动力短缺,直接播种水稻(Oryza sativa)栽培(DSR)正在逐渐取代移栽水稻栽培(TPR)。然而,在现行农民实践(FPs)下,DSR的产量低于TPR。引进最佳管理实践(BMPs),即研究人员和推广人员编制的整体技术包,将有助于提高DSR产量。我们旨在量化施用bmp对农田产量、投入要素(劳动力需求和生产成本)和DSR成本效益的影响,并将其与TPR结果进行比较。在东帝汶进行了为期2年的农场试验,并将农民分为2 × 2试验设计:农民在DSR中使用FPs,在DSR中使用bmp,在TPR中使用FPs,或在TPR中使用bmp。在bmp条件下,DSR和TPR的产量差异不显著(3.5 t / ha - 1比3.6 t / ha - 1),但DSR的产量比FPs条件下的TPR低20% (2.4 t / ha - 1比3.0 t / ha - 1)。BMPs对DSR的增产(+46%)大于TPR的增产(+20%)。DSR中BMPs的效益成本比TPR中BMPs的效益成本比高21%(1.48比1.22)。DSR农民通过应用bmp可以获得与TPR农民相似的产量,劳动力更少,生产成本更低,即使在自给农业盛行的地方也是如此。本研究中bmp对DSR和TPR的影响表明bmp可以通过DSR提高热带农业发展计划中的土地和劳动生产率。
期刊介绍:
After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture.
Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.