Comparison effectiveness of topical analgesics with and without Entonox for esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A randomized controlled trial

IF 1.4 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
DEN open Pub Date : 2025-05-19 DOI:10.1002/deo2.70107
Papiroon Noitasaeng, Uayporn Kaosombatwattana, Rojsirin Chaiwong, Phongthara Vichitvejpaisal
{"title":"Comparison effectiveness of topical analgesics with and without Entonox for esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A randomized controlled trial","authors":"Papiroon Noitasaeng,&nbsp;Uayporn Kaosombatwattana,&nbsp;Rojsirin Chaiwong,&nbsp;Phongthara Vichitvejpaisal","doi":"10.1002/deo2.70107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is vital for diagnosing and treating upper gastrointestinal symptoms, but patient discomfort and anxiety can affect procedural outcomes. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of topical analgesics with and without Entonox during EGD in terms of procedural success, patient tolerance, and satisfaction.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial. Patients were assigned to receive either 10% xylocaine spray in the control group (Group C) or 10% xylocaine spray combined with Entonox (Group E). Procedural success and patient comfort were evaluated using the Bath Gastroscopy Toleration Score and patient comfort scores, with scores of 0 or 1 indicating success. Satisfaction was measured using the numeric rating scale, where scores of 7 or higher indicated high satisfaction.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 211 patients underwent EGD successfully (Group C = 106, Group E = 105). Patients in Group E demonstrated a significantly higher proportion of success rate (76.2% vs. 35.9%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), better toleration score (82.9% vs. 75.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.004), and better patient comfort score (86.7% vs. 39.6%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) compared to Group C. Endoscopists and patients in Group E expressed higher satisfaction levels (9 vs. 8, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01 and 9 vs. 8, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). The side effects of Entonox were minimal. Notably, Group E had a lower proportion of high blood pressure and tachycardia during the procedure (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Combining Entonox with topical analgesics significantly improves tolerance, satisfaction, and procedural success during EGD, offering a safe and effective option for managing patient discomfort and anxiety.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93973,"journal":{"name":"DEN open","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/deo2.70107","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DEN open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.70107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is vital for diagnosing and treating upper gastrointestinal symptoms, but patient discomfort and anxiety can affect procedural outcomes. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of topical analgesics with and without Entonox during EGD in terms of procedural success, patient tolerance, and satisfaction.

Methods

A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial. Patients were assigned to receive either 10% xylocaine spray in the control group (Group C) or 10% xylocaine spray combined with Entonox (Group E). Procedural success and patient comfort were evaluated using the Bath Gastroscopy Toleration Score and patient comfort scores, with scores of 0 or 1 indicating success. Satisfaction was measured using the numeric rating scale, where scores of 7 or higher indicated high satisfaction.

Results

A total of 211 patients underwent EGD successfully (Group C = 106, Group E = 105). Patients in Group E demonstrated a significantly higher proportion of success rate (76.2% vs. 35.9%, p < 0.001), better toleration score (82.9% vs. 75.5%, p = 0.004), and better patient comfort score (86.7% vs. 39.6%, p < 0.001) compared to Group C. Endoscopists and patients in Group E expressed higher satisfaction levels (9 vs. 8, p < 0.01 and 9 vs. 8, p < 0.01). The side effects of Entonox were minimal. Notably, Group E had a lower proportion of high blood pressure and tachycardia during the procedure (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Combining Entonox with topical analgesics significantly improves tolerance, satisfaction, and procedural success during EGD, offering a safe and effective option for managing patient discomfort and anxiety.

食管胃十二指肠镜检查中局部镇痛药加与不加恩托诺的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验
目的食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)对诊断和治疗上消化道症状至关重要,但患者的不适和焦虑会影响手术结果。本研究的目的是比较外用镇痛药加和不加恩托诺在EGD期间手术成功率、患者耐受性和满意度方面的有效性。方法采用前瞻性、随机、双盲、对照试验。患者被分配接受10%木卡因喷雾剂作为对照组(C组)或10%木卡因喷雾剂联合恩托诺(E组)。采用巴斯胃镜耐受性评分和患者舒适度评分对手术成功和患者舒适度进行评估,0分或1分表示成功。满意度是用数字评定量表来衡量的,7分或更高的分数表示高满意度。结果211例患者成功行EGD手术(C组106例,E组105例)。E组患者的成功率明显高于对照组(76.2% vs. 35.9%, p <;0.001)、更好的耐受性评分(82.9%比75.5%,p = 0.004)和更好的患者舒适度评分(86.7%比39.6%,p <;0.001),与c组相比,E组内窥镜医师和患者的满意度更高(9比8,p <;0.01和9比8,p <;0.01)。恩托诺的副作用很小。值得注意的是,E组在手术过程中高血压和心动过速的比例较低(p <;0.001)。结论恩托诺联合局部镇痛药可显著提高EGD的耐受性、满意度和手术成功率,为治疗患者不适和焦虑提供了安全有效的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信