Nam Kyung Han, Gwang Suk Kim, Sunah Kim, Tae Wha Lee, Woojin Chung
{"title":"The Political Competence Scale for Nurses (PCS-N): Instrument Development and Psychometric Evaluation","authors":"Nam Kyung Han, Gwang Suk Kim, Sunah Kim, Tae Wha Lee, Woojin Chung","doi":"10.1155/jonm/4683994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> Few tools are available to measure nurses’ political competence, and the existing ones have limitations in reflecting the multidimensional factors of competence. This study developed a multidimensional political competence measurement tool—the Political Competence Scale for Nurses (PCS-N)—and assessed its validity and reliability in measuring nurses’ political competence levels.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> This methodological study was based on the tool development and tool-test stages suggested by DeVellis.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> The validity and reliability of the PCS-N were established. The PCS-N was tested for construct validity through content validity, item-total correlations of preliminary items, and exploratory factor analysis. The PCS-N comprises 35 items across four factors: political knowledge, political efficacy, political interaction, and political activity. The suitability of this measurement tool was established through construct validity and confirmatory factor analysis. Concurrent validity was verified and was significantly correlated with existing political science measurement tools, political efficacy, and political interest (<i>r</i> = 0.511, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s <i>α</i> = 0.951) and test–retest reliability were also established, confirming the stability of the PCS-N.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> The PCS-N can be used to evaluate nurses’ political competence and provide a basis for constructing education and training programs to strengthen political competence and evaluate their effectiveness.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49297,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Management","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/jonm/4683994","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/jonm/4683994","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Few tools are available to measure nurses’ political competence, and the existing ones have limitations in reflecting the multidimensional factors of competence. This study developed a multidimensional political competence measurement tool—the Political Competence Scale for Nurses (PCS-N)—and assessed its validity and reliability in measuring nurses’ political competence levels.
Methods: This methodological study was based on the tool development and tool-test stages suggested by DeVellis.
Results: The validity and reliability of the PCS-N were established. The PCS-N was tested for construct validity through content validity, item-total correlations of preliminary items, and exploratory factor analysis. The PCS-N comprises 35 items across four factors: political knowledge, political efficacy, political interaction, and political activity. The suitability of this measurement tool was established through construct validity and confirmatory factor analysis. Concurrent validity was verified and was significantly correlated with existing political science measurement tools, political efficacy, and political interest (r = 0.511, p < 0.001). Internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.951) and test–retest reliability were also established, confirming the stability of the PCS-N.
Conclusions: The PCS-N can be used to evaluate nurses’ political competence and provide a basis for constructing education and training programs to strengthen political competence and evaluate their effectiveness.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Nursing Management is an international forum which informs and advances the discipline of nursing management and leadership. The Journal encourages scholarly debate and critical analysis resulting in a rich source of evidence which underpins and illuminates the practice of management, innovation and leadership in nursing and health care. It publishes current issues and developments in practice in the form of research papers, in-depth commentaries and analyses.
The complex and rapidly changing nature of global health care is constantly generating new challenges and questions. The Journal of Nursing Management welcomes papers from researchers, academics, practitioners, managers, and policy makers from a range of countries and backgrounds which examine these issues and contribute to the body of knowledge in international nursing management and leadership worldwide.
The Journal of Nursing Management aims to:
-Inform practitioners and researchers in nursing management and leadership
-Explore and debate current issues in nursing management and leadership
-Assess the evidence for current practice
-Develop best practice in nursing management and leadership
-Examine the impact of policy developments
-Address issues in governance, quality and safety