Pharmacodynamic Effect of Different Dosage Regimes of Oseltamivir in Severe Influenza Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation: A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial

IF 4.3 4区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Wai-Tat Wong, Gordon Choi, Xiansong Wang, William Ka Kei Wu, Ge Lin, Martin Chi Wai Chan, King Chung Kenny Chan, Philip Koon Ngai Lam, David Shu Cheong Hui, Matthew T. V. Chan
{"title":"Pharmacodynamic Effect of Different Dosage Regimes of Oseltamivir in Severe Influenza Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation: A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial","authors":"Wai-Tat Wong,&nbsp;Gordon Choi,&nbsp;Xiansong Wang,&nbsp;William Ka Kei Wu,&nbsp;Ge Lin,&nbsp;Martin Chi Wai Chan,&nbsp;King Chung Kenny Chan,&nbsp;Philip Koon Ngai Lam,&nbsp;David Shu Cheong Hui,&nbsp;Matthew T. V. Chan","doi":"10.1111/irv.70109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This randomised controlled trial evaluated whether higher doses of oseltamivir would improve virological and clinical outcomes in severe influenza patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Forty intubated adult patients with severe influenza A or B from four intensive care units in Hong Kong were enrolled and randomised to receive either a double dose (300 mg/day) or a triple dose (450 mg/day) of oseltamivir for 10 days. Baseline data were collected, and outcomes were assessed daily using SOFA and Murray scores. Viral RNA was quantified from nasopharyngeal and tracheal aspirates. The primary outcome was the viral clearance rate after 5 days of treatment; secondary outcomes included 28-day and hospital mortality rates, changes in viral load, and serial SOFA and Murray scores.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Viral clearance rates after 5 days of treatment were low and similar between the double (3/20, 15%) and triple-dose groups (2/20, 10%). No significant differences were observed in 28-day mortality, hospital mortality, ICU length of stay or duration of mechanical ventilation between the double and triple-dose groups. However, patients receiving triple doses exhibited a faster decline in influenza A viral load but had a longer hospital length of stay.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Triple doses of oseltamivir did not significantly improve virological or clinical outcomes compared with double doses in severe influenza.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13544,"journal":{"name":"Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses","volume":"19 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/irv.70109","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/irv.70109","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives

This randomised controlled trial evaluated whether higher doses of oseltamivir would improve virological and clinical outcomes in severe influenza patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation.

Methods

Forty intubated adult patients with severe influenza A or B from four intensive care units in Hong Kong were enrolled and randomised to receive either a double dose (300 mg/day) or a triple dose (450 mg/day) of oseltamivir for 10 days. Baseline data were collected, and outcomes were assessed daily using SOFA and Murray scores. Viral RNA was quantified from nasopharyngeal and tracheal aspirates. The primary outcome was the viral clearance rate after 5 days of treatment; secondary outcomes included 28-day and hospital mortality rates, changes in viral load, and serial SOFA and Murray scores.

Results

Viral clearance rates after 5 days of treatment were low and similar between the double (3/20, 15%) and triple-dose groups (2/20, 10%). No significant differences were observed in 28-day mortality, hospital mortality, ICU length of stay or duration of mechanical ventilation between the double and triple-dose groups. However, patients receiving triple doses exhibited a faster decline in influenza A viral load but had a longer hospital length of stay.

Conclusions

Triple doses of oseltamivir did not significantly improve virological or clinical outcomes compared with double doses in severe influenza.

不同剂量奥司他韦对需要机械通气的重症流感患者的药效学影响:一项多中心随机对照试验
背景和目的本随机对照试验评估了高剂量奥司他韦是否会改善需要有创机械通气的重症流感患者的病毒学和临床结果。方法选取来自香港4个重症监护病房的40名成年重症甲型或乙型流感患者,随机分组接受双剂量(300 mg/天)或三剂量(450 mg/天)奥司他韦治疗10天。收集基线数据,每日使用SOFA和Murray评分评估结果。从鼻咽和气管吸入物中定量检测病毒RNA。主要终点是治疗5天后的病毒清除率;次要结局包括28天和住院死亡率、病毒载量变化、SOFA和Murray评分。结果双剂量组(3/ 20,15%)和三剂量组(2/ 20,10%)治疗5 d后病毒清除率较低,且相似。双剂量组和三剂量组28天死亡率、住院死亡率、ICU住院时间和机械通气时间均无显著差异。然而,接受三次剂量的患者表现出更快的甲型流感病毒载量下降,但住院时间更长。结论与双剂量奥司他韦相比,三剂量奥司他韦对重症流感患者的病毒学或临床结果没有显著改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
120
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses is the official journal of the International Society of Influenza and Other Respiratory Virus Diseases - an independent scientific professional society - dedicated to promoting the prevention, detection, treatment, and control of influenza and other respiratory virus diseases. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses is an Open Access journal. Copyright on any research article published by Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses is retained by the author(s). Authors grant Wiley a license to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher. Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信