Development and Validation of Viable Model and Measure of Yogic Leadership: A Novel and Holistic Paradigm

IF 4.3 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Neha P. Sangodkar, Rudra B. Bhandari
{"title":"Development and Validation of Viable Model and Measure of Yogic Leadership: A Novel and Holistic Paradigm","authors":"Neha P. Sangodkar,&nbsp;Rudra B. Bhandari","doi":"10.1155/hbe2/5105841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite yoga’s potential to foster organizational excellence, the intersection of leadership and yoga has received limited scholarly attention. Therefore, we aimed to address this gap by developing and validating the yogic leadership scale (YLS). This study was conducted in three rigorous phases. Of 54 framed items, 49 were validated for their content by 10 experts. The first draft of YLS was subsequently administered to 669 participants for exploratory factor analysis and 256 participants for confirmatory factor analysis. The model was a good fit with five distinct factors—wellness and four intelligences (bodily kinaesthetic, cognitive, emotional, and spiritual). YLS’s intermodal convergent and discriminant validity were assessed by correlating with 10 criterion measures—Abbreviated Self-Leadership Questionnaire (ASLQ), Ethical Leadership Scale (ELS), Servant Leadership Behavior Scale (SLBS-6), Spiritual Leadership Questionnaire (SLQ), Paternalistic Leadership Behavior Scale (PLBS), Authentic Leadership Questionnaire (ALQ), Personal Efficacy Scale (PES), Vedic Personality Inventory (VPI), Ryff’s Psychological Well-Being Scale (RPWS), and <i>Vikruti Subdosha</i> Questionnaire (VSQ). The results demonstrated strong positive correlations between the subscales of YLS and six criterion measures—PLBS, ASLQ, SLBS-6, SLQ, RPWS, and the <i>satva</i> aspect of VPI, supporting their conceptual convergence. The YLS subscales showed moderate and weak positive correlations with PES, ALQ, and the <i>rajas</i> aspect of VPI, indicating conceptual divergence. The YLS subscales also had negative correlations with VSQ and the <i>tamas</i> aspect of VPI by showing their conceptual divergence. Finally, YLS emerged as a novel tool to measure four dimensions of intelligence and wellness, which can aid in designing personalized bio-psycho-socio-spiritual interventions to optimize leadership influence, wellness, and work efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":36408,"journal":{"name":"Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hbe2/5105841","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hbe2/5105841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite yoga’s potential to foster organizational excellence, the intersection of leadership and yoga has received limited scholarly attention. Therefore, we aimed to address this gap by developing and validating the yogic leadership scale (YLS). This study was conducted in three rigorous phases. Of 54 framed items, 49 were validated for their content by 10 experts. The first draft of YLS was subsequently administered to 669 participants for exploratory factor analysis and 256 participants for confirmatory factor analysis. The model was a good fit with five distinct factors—wellness and four intelligences (bodily kinaesthetic, cognitive, emotional, and spiritual). YLS’s intermodal convergent and discriminant validity were assessed by correlating with 10 criterion measures—Abbreviated Self-Leadership Questionnaire (ASLQ), Ethical Leadership Scale (ELS), Servant Leadership Behavior Scale (SLBS-6), Spiritual Leadership Questionnaire (SLQ), Paternalistic Leadership Behavior Scale (PLBS), Authentic Leadership Questionnaire (ALQ), Personal Efficacy Scale (PES), Vedic Personality Inventory (VPI), Ryff’s Psychological Well-Being Scale (RPWS), and Vikruti Subdosha Questionnaire (VSQ). The results demonstrated strong positive correlations between the subscales of YLS and six criterion measures—PLBS, ASLQ, SLBS-6, SLQ, RPWS, and the satva aspect of VPI, supporting their conceptual convergence. The YLS subscales showed moderate and weak positive correlations with PES, ALQ, and the rajas aspect of VPI, indicating conceptual divergence. The YLS subscales also had negative correlations with VSQ and the tamas aspect of VPI by showing their conceptual divergence. Finally, YLS emerged as a novel tool to measure four dimensions of intelligence and wellness, which can aid in designing personalized bio-psycho-socio-spiritual interventions to optimize leadership influence, wellness, and work efficiency.

瑜伽领导的可行模型和测量的发展和验证:一个新颖的整体范式
尽管瑜伽具有培养卓越组织的潜力,但领导力和瑜伽的交集却受到了有限的学术关注。因此,我们旨在通过开发和验证瑜伽领导量表(YLS)来解决这一差距。这项研究分为三个严格的阶段。在54个框架项目中,有49个由10位专家对其内容进行了验证。随后对669名参与者进行探索性因子分析,对256名参与者进行验证性因子分析。这个模型很好地契合了五个不同的因素——健康和四种智能(身体动觉、认知、情感和精神)。通过与10个标准量表(精简自我领导问卷(ASLQ)、伦理型领导量表(ELS)、仆人型领导行为量表(SLBS-6)、精神型领导问卷(SLQ)、家长式领导行为量表(PLBS)、真实型领导问卷(ALQ)、个人效能量表(PES)、韦达人格量表(VPI)、Ryff心理健康量表(RPWS)、和Vikruti Subdosha问卷(VSQ)。结果表明,YLS的子量表与plbs、ASLQ、SLBS-6、SLQ、RPWS和VPI的satva方面存在显著的正相关关系,支持了它们的概念收敛性。YLS子量表与PES、ALQ和VPI的rajas方面呈中、弱正相关,表明概念上的差异。YLS子量表与VSQ和VPI的tamas方面也存在负相关,表现出它们的概念差异。最后,YLS作为一种测量智力和健康四个维度的新工具,可以帮助设计个性化的生物心理社会精神干预措施,以优化领导影响力、健康和工作效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
17.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-impact research that enhances understanding of the complex interactions between diverse human behavior and emerging digital technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信