Combined Administration of Lactobacillus or Bifidobacterium Offers Enhanced Antidepressant and Anxiolytic Activity in a Dose Dependent Manner

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Aliu Zanzeh Bankah, Thomas Amatey Tagoe, Emmanuel Darko, Righteous Agoha, Elmer Nayra Ametefe, Kennedy Kwami Edem Kukuia, Samuel Adjei
{"title":"Combined Administration of Lactobacillus or Bifidobacterium Offers Enhanced Antidepressant and Anxiolytic Activity in a Dose Dependent Manner","authors":"Aliu Zanzeh Bankah,&nbsp;Thomas Amatey Tagoe,&nbsp;Emmanuel Darko,&nbsp;Righteous Agoha,&nbsp;Elmer Nayra Ametefe,&nbsp;Kennedy Kwami Edem Kukuia,&nbsp;Samuel Adjei","doi":"10.1002/brb3.70564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Gut microbiota is strongly linked to the activity of the bidirectional gut-brain axis, which influences neuropsychological processes at multiple levels. Changes in the gut microbiota have been implicated in mood disorders, and probiotics have been explored for their ability to mitigate the effects of stress on mental health. Here, we investigated the therapeutic benefits of different concentrations and combinations of <i>Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium</i> in a mouse model of stress induced depression and anxiety.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Sixty-three male ICR mice (6–8 weeks old; 20–25g) divided into nine groups were used for this study. The test groups underwent chronic unpredictable mild stress protocols for two weeks before receiving low (10<sup>4</sup> CFU/ml) or high (10<sup>8</sup> CFU/ml) doses of either monotherapy (<i>Lactobacillus</i> or <i>Bifidobacterium</i>) or a combination therapy (<i>Lactobacillus</i> and <i>Bifidobacterium</i>) for four weeks. The antidepressant, fluoxetine, served as the positive control. Measurements of weight and sucrose preference were performed at four time points in addition to a battery of behavioral tests (open field tests, forced swim test, tail suspension test, and hot plate test) at the endpoint to assess depression and anxiety-like behavior.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Low doses of the probiotic formulation (mono- or combined therapy) reversed weight loss but not anhedonia. In contrast, high doses of probiotic formulations (mono- or combined therapy), along with fluoxetine, were effective in reversing the weight loss and anhedonia caused by chronic unpredictable mild stress. Probiotics ameliorated stress-induced immobility as measured by both the forced swim and tail suspension tests, while also reducing anxiety-like behavior (increased peripheral activity) in the open field test. High doses of mono- or combined therapy increased curling behavior in the tail suspension test, whereas fluoxetine failed to do so.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study indicates the species- and dose-dependent beneficial effects of probiotics on behavioral outcomes associated with depression while also reversing weight loss. Evidence suggests that probiotics and fluoxetine may exert antidepressant activity via different mechanisms.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9081,"journal":{"name":"Brain and Behavior","volume":"15 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/brb3.70564","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/brb3.70564","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Gut microbiota is strongly linked to the activity of the bidirectional gut-brain axis, which influences neuropsychological processes at multiple levels. Changes in the gut microbiota have been implicated in mood disorders, and probiotics have been explored for their ability to mitigate the effects of stress on mental health. Here, we investigated the therapeutic benefits of different concentrations and combinations of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium in a mouse model of stress induced depression and anxiety.

Methods

Sixty-three male ICR mice (6–8 weeks old; 20–25g) divided into nine groups were used for this study. The test groups underwent chronic unpredictable mild stress protocols for two weeks before receiving low (104 CFU/ml) or high (108 CFU/ml) doses of either monotherapy (Lactobacillus or Bifidobacterium) or a combination therapy (Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium) for four weeks. The antidepressant, fluoxetine, served as the positive control. Measurements of weight and sucrose preference were performed at four time points in addition to a battery of behavioral tests (open field tests, forced swim test, tail suspension test, and hot plate test) at the endpoint to assess depression and anxiety-like behavior.

Results

Low doses of the probiotic formulation (mono- or combined therapy) reversed weight loss but not anhedonia. In contrast, high doses of probiotic formulations (mono- or combined therapy), along with fluoxetine, were effective in reversing the weight loss and anhedonia caused by chronic unpredictable mild stress. Probiotics ameliorated stress-induced immobility as measured by both the forced swim and tail suspension tests, while also reducing anxiety-like behavior (increased peripheral activity) in the open field test. High doses of mono- or combined therapy increased curling behavior in the tail suspension test, whereas fluoxetine failed to do so.

Conclusion

This study indicates the species- and dose-dependent beneficial effects of probiotics on behavioral outcomes associated with depression while also reversing weight loss. Evidence suggests that probiotics and fluoxetine may exert antidepressant activity via different mechanisms.

乳杆菌或双歧杆菌联合用药可增强抗抑郁和抗焦虑活性
肠道微生物群与双向肠脑轴的活动密切相关,并在多个层面上影响神经心理过程。肠道菌群的变化与情绪障碍有关,益生菌也因其减轻压力对心理健康影响的能力而被探索。在这里,我们研究了不同浓度和组合的乳酸杆菌和双歧杆菌对应激性抑郁和焦虑小鼠模型的治疗效果。方法雄性ICR小鼠63只(6 ~ 8周龄;20-25g),分为9组。试验组在接受低(104 CFU/ml)或高(108 CFU/ml)剂量的单药治疗(乳酸菌或双歧杆菌)或联合治疗(乳酸菌和双歧杆菌)4周之前接受慢性不可预测的轻度应激方案2周。抗抑郁药氟西汀作为阳性对照。在四个时间点测量体重和蔗糖偏好,并在终点进行一系列行为测试(野外测试、强迫游泳测试、悬尾测试和热板测试),以评估抑郁和焦虑样行为。结果低剂量的益生菌制剂(单一或联合治疗)逆转了体重减轻,但没有快感缺乏。相比之下,高剂量的益生菌制剂(单一或联合治疗),以及氟西汀,可以有效地逆转由慢性不可预测的轻度压力引起的体重减轻和快感缺乏。通过强迫游泳和悬尾测试,益生菌改善了应激诱导的不动,同时也减少了野外测试中的焦虑样行为(增加外周活动)。高剂量的单一或联合治疗增加了尾巴悬浮试验中的卷曲行为,而氟西汀没有这样做。结论:本研究表明,益生菌对抑郁症相关行为结果的有益作用具有种类和剂量依赖性,同时也能逆转体重减轻。有证据表明,益生菌和氟西汀可能通过不同的机制发挥抗抑郁作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain and Behavior
Brain and Behavior BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
352
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Brain and Behavior is supported by other journals published by Wiley, including a number of society-owned journals. The journals listed below support Brain and Behavior and participate in the Manuscript Transfer Program by referring articles of suitable quality and offering authors the option to have their paper, with any peer review reports, automatically transferred to Brain and Behavior. * [Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica](https://publons.com/journal/1366/acta-psychiatrica-scandinavica) * [Addiction Biology](https://publons.com/journal/1523/addiction-biology) * [Aggressive Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/3611/aggressive-behavior) * [Brain Pathology](https://publons.com/journal/1787/brain-pathology) * [Child: Care, Health and Development](https://publons.com/journal/6111/child-care-health-and-development) * [Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health](https://publons.com/journal/3839/criminal-behaviour-and-mental-health) * [Depression and Anxiety](https://publons.com/journal/1528/depression-and-anxiety) * Developmental Neurobiology * [Developmental Science](https://publons.com/journal/1069/developmental-science) * [European Journal of Neuroscience](https://publons.com/journal/1441/european-journal-of-neuroscience) * [Genes, Brain and Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/1635/genes-brain-and-behavior) * [GLIA](https://publons.com/journal/1287/glia) * [Hippocampus](https://publons.com/journal/1056/hippocampus) * [Human Brain Mapping](https://publons.com/journal/500/human-brain-mapping) * [Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour](https://publons.com/journal/7330/journal-for-the-theory-of-social-behaviour) * [Journal of Comparative Neurology](https://publons.com/journal/1306/journal-of-comparative-neurology) * [Journal of Neuroimaging](https://publons.com/journal/6379/journal-of-neuroimaging) * [Journal of Neuroscience Research](https://publons.com/journal/2778/journal-of-neuroscience-research) * [Journal of Organizational Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/1123/journal-of-organizational-behavior) * [Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System](https://publons.com/journal/3929/journal-of-the-peripheral-nervous-system) * [Muscle & Nerve](https://publons.com/journal/4448/muscle-and-nerve) * [Neural Pathology and Applied Neurobiology](https://publons.com/journal/2401/neuropathology-and-applied-neurobiology)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信