Connectivity Benefits Most Woodland Invertebrate Species but Only in Landscapes With Low Woodland Cover

IF 7.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecology Letters Pub Date : 2025-05-19 DOI:10.1111/ele.70131
Charles A. Cunningham, Colin M. Beale, Diana E. Bowler, Michael J. O. Pocock, Robin Hutchinson, Piran C. L. White, Merryn Hunt, Lindsay Maskell, Jane K. Hill
{"title":"Connectivity Benefits Most Woodland Invertebrate Species but Only in Landscapes With Low Woodland Cover","authors":"Charles A. Cunningham,&nbsp;Colin M. Beale,&nbsp;Diana E. Bowler,&nbsp;Michael J. O. Pocock,&nbsp;Robin Hutchinson,&nbsp;Piran C. L. White,&nbsp;Merryn Hunt,&nbsp;Lindsay Maskell,&nbsp;Jane K. Hill","doi":"10.1111/ele.70131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Connectivity is widely assumed to benefit biodiversity, but this has not been extensively quantified across multiple taxa and landscapes. Focusing on the UK, where woodland cover is low (13%), we analysed species occurrence records from citizen science for over 800 broadleaf woodland-associated invertebrate species from 15 taxonomic groups in relation to woodland cover and connectivity. Overall, increased woodland connectivity positively affects broadleaf-associated species occurrence (effect of connectivity across species, accounting for positive effect of broadleaf cover). The benefits of connectivity varied considerably by species: 39% of species showed a significant positive effect, while for 3% it was significantly negative. However, the interaction between cover and connectivity revealed that, overall, connectivity benefits are only found in low cover landscapes. Our findings emphasise potential biodiversity benefits from maximising connectivity when increasing woodland cover and highlight the importance of spatial targeting in restoration efforts, especially in landscapes with low woodland cover.</p>","PeriodicalId":161,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Letters","volume":"28 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ele.70131","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.70131","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Connectivity is widely assumed to benefit biodiversity, but this has not been extensively quantified across multiple taxa and landscapes. Focusing on the UK, where woodland cover is low (13%), we analysed species occurrence records from citizen science for over 800 broadleaf woodland-associated invertebrate species from 15 taxonomic groups in relation to woodland cover and connectivity. Overall, increased woodland connectivity positively affects broadleaf-associated species occurrence (effect of connectivity across species, accounting for positive effect of broadleaf cover). The benefits of connectivity varied considerably by species: 39% of species showed a significant positive effect, while for 3% it was significantly negative. However, the interaction between cover and connectivity revealed that, overall, connectivity benefits are only found in low cover landscapes. Our findings emphasise potential biodiversity benefits from maximising connectivity when increasing woodland cover and highlight the importance of spatial targeting in restoration efforts, especially in landscapes with low woodland cover.

Abstract Image

连通性有利于大多数林地无脊椎动物物种,但仅在低林地覆盖的景观中
人们普遍认为连通性有利于生物多样性,但这一点尚未在多个分类群和景观中得到广泛量化。以林地覆盖率低(13%)的英国为研究对象,我们分析了来自公民科学的物种发生记录,包括800多种阔叶林地相关无脊椎动物,它们来自15个分类类群,与林地覆盖率和连通性有关。总体而言,林地连通性的增加正影响阔叶相关物种的发生(跨物种的连通性效应,说明阔叶覆盖的正效应)。连通性的好处因物种而异:39%的物种表现出显著的积极影响,而3%的物种表现出显著的消极影响。然而,覆盖度与连通性之间的相互作用表明,总体而言,连通性优势仅存在于低覆盖度景观中。我们的研究结果强调了在增加林地覆盖时最大化连通性对生物多样性的潜在益处,并强调了恢复工作中空间定位的重要性,特别是在低林地覆盖的景观中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecology Letters
Ecology Letters 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
201
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Ecology Letters serves as a platform for the rapid publication of innovative research in ecology. It considers manuscripts across all taxa, biomes, and geographic regions, prioritizing papers that investigate clearly stated hypotheses. The journal publishes concise papers of high originality and general interest, contributing to new developments in ecology. Purely descriptive papers and those that only confirm or extend previous results are discouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信