The Prevalence of Polypharmacy and the Contribution of Age, Period, and Cohort Effects in Sweden From 2006 to 2020

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Theodore T. Miao, Malin Ericsson, Jonas W. Wastesson
{"title":"The Prevalence of Polypharmacy and the Contribution of Age, Period, and Cohort Effects in Sweden From 2006 to 2020","authors":"Theodore T. Miao,&nbsp;Malin Ericsson,&nbsp;Jonas W. Wastesson","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.70778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate the age, period, and cohort effects of polypharmacy in older adults using Swedish register data covering the period 2006 to 2020.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Repeated cross-sectional study using routinely-collected health care data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Nationwide, Sweden.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Participants</h3>\n \n <p>A 10% random sample was drawn each year from the source population of all adults aged ≥ 65 in Sweden, 2006–2020 (cumulative <i>n</i> &gt; 3,000,000).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Measurement</h3>\n \n <p>Polypharmacy was defined as the use of ≥ 5 medicines. Drug data were extracted from the National Prescribed Drug Register (NPDR) Medication use was assessed on 1st January (1-day point prevalence) each year based on the drug duration episodes. Age-Period-Cohort analysis was conducted to explore these effects.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, 32.8% of older adults was exposed to polypharmacy in 2020 compared to 28.6% in 2006. This increase was more pronounced among individuals aged 85 to 89, from while the prevalence remained relatively steady among those aged 65 to 84. In the formal Age-Period-Cohort analysis, the cohort differences were weak for polypharmacy, but more prevalent for specific medication classes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Polypharmacy is mainly influenced by age and period effects, but not by cohort. The rise in polypharmacy is primarily propelled by an increased pace in medication use among individuals aged 75 to 89 years. These findings can provide valuable insights for making effective strategies aimed at reducing polypharmacy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":"8 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.70778","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the age, period, and cohort effects of polypharmacy in older adults using Swedish register data covering the period 2006 to 2020.

Design

Repeated cross-sectional study using routinely-collected health care data.

Setting

Nationwide, Sweden.

Participants

A 10% random sample was drawn each year from the source population of all adults aged ≥ 65 in Sweden, 2006–2020 (cumulative n > 3,000,000).

Measurement

Polypharmacy was defined as the use of ≥ 5 medicines. Drug data were extracted from the National Prescribed Drug Register (NPDR) Medication use was assessed on 1st January (1-day point prevalence) each year based on the drug duration episodes. Age-Period-Cohort analysis was conducted to explore these effects.

Results

Overall, 32.8% of older adults was exposed to polypharmacy in 2020 compared to 28.6% in 2006. This increase was more pronounced among individuals aged 85 to 89, from while the prevalence remained relatively steady among those aged 65 to 84. In the formal Age-Period-Cohort analysis, the cohort differences were weak for polypharmacy, but more prevalent for specific medication classes.

Conclusion

Polypharmacy is mainly influenced by age and period effects, but not by cohort. The rise in polypharmacy is primarily propelled by an increased pace in medication use among individuals aged 75 to 89 years. These findings can provide valuable insights for making effective strategies aimed at reducing polypharmacy.

2006年至2020年瑞典多种用药的流行及年龄、时期和队列效应的贡献
目的利用瑞典2006年至2020年的登记数据,调查老年人多药治疗的年龄、时期和队列效应。设计使用常规收集的卫生保健数据进行重复横断面研究。设置全国,瑞典。2006-2020年,每年从瑞典所有年龄≥65岁的成年人中随机抽取10%的样本(累计n >; 3,000,000)。多重用药定义为使用≥5种药物。根据用药持续时间,每年1月1日(1天点流行率)评估用药情况。进行年龄-时期-队列分析以探讨这些影响。结果总体而言,2020年有32.8%的老年人暴露于多种药物,而2006年这一比例为28.6%。这种增长在85岁至89岁的人群中更为明显,而在65岁至84岁的人群中患病率保持相对稳定。在正式的年龄-时期-队列分析中,多种用药的队列差异较弱,但在特定药物类别中更为普遍。结论多药主要受年龄和时期效应的影响,而不受队列效应的影响。多种用药的增加主要是由于75至89岁人群用药速度的增加。这些发现可以为制定有效的减少多药的策略提供有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信