Hanna Lähteenmäki, Tommi Pätilä, Ismo T. Räisänen, Rauni Kalliala, Timo Sorsa
{"title":"Peri-Implant Diseases: Enhanced Antibacterial Photodynamic Therapy","authors":"Hanna Lähteenmäki, Tommi Pätilä, Ismo T. Räisänen, Rauni Kalliala, Timo Sorsa","doi":"10.1002/cre2.70146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The number of dental implants is constantly on the rise, and inflammation of their surrounding tissues is an increasing problem. In this randomized controlled trial, we investigated the effects of antibacterial dual-light photodynamic therapy (aPDT) in peri-implant disease in reduction of inflammation in the peri-implant tissues.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Forty patients with newly diagnosed peri-implant disease were recruited. The diagnoses were established clinically and by radiological bone loss (RBL). Dual-light aPDT was provided by indocyanine green mouth rinsing and 50:50, 405 nm, and 810 nm light applicator. The treatment group (<i>n</i> = 20) was randomized to use aPDT treatment at home for 4 weeks. The treatment was carried out once daily for 2 weeks, then twice daily for the next 2 weeks. The control group (<i>n</i> = 20) continued enhanced self-care during the study period. Traditional measurement methods around the implant were measured at the beginning, at 2 weeks and at 4 weeks.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>During the study period, VPI decreased in both groups. In the treatment group BOP decreased from mean (SD) 4.7 ± 1.3 to 1.8 ± 1.6, <i>p</i> < 0.0001, but no change was observed in the control group (3.5 ± 2.3 to 3.0 ± 2.3, <i>p</i> = 0.39). In the aPDT treatment group aMMP-8 decreased from mean (SD) 100 ± 41 to 72 ± 38, <i>p</i> = 0.027, but not in the control group (86 ± 54 to 86 ± 60, <i>p</i> = 0.38).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Regularly applied dual-light aPDT reduces inflammation in the dental implant adjacent tissues. Dual-light aPDT approach holds promise as an effective home care tool for implant patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10203,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research","volume":"11 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cre2.70146","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cre2.70146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
The number of dental implants is constantly on the rise, and inflammation of their surrounding tissues is an increasing problem. In this randomized controlled trial, we investigated the effects of antibacterial dual-light photodynamic therapy (aPDT) in peri-implant disease in reduction of inflammation in the peri-implant tissues.
Material and Methods
Forty patients with newly diagnosed peri-implant disease were recruited. The diagnoses were established clinically and by radiological bone loss (RBL). Dual-light aPDT was provided by indocyanine green mouth rinsing and 50:50, 405 nm, and 810 nm light applicator. The treatment group (n = 20) was randomized to use aPDT treatment at home for 4 weeks. The treatment was carried out once daily for 2 weeks, then twice daily for the next 2 weeks. The control group (n = 20) continued enhanced self-care during the study period. Traditional measurement methods around the implant were measured at the beginning, at 2 weeks and at 4 weeks.
Results
During the study period, VPI decreased in both groups. In the treatment group BOP decreased from mean (SD) 4.7 ± 1.3 to 1.8 ± 1.6, p < 0.0001, but no change was observed in the control group (3.5 ± 2.3 to 3.0 ± 2.3, p = 0.39). In the aPDT treatment group aMMP-8 decreased from mean (SD) 100 ± 41 to 72 ± 38, p = 0.027, but not in the control group (86 ± 54 to 86 ± 60, p = 0.38).
Conclusions
Regularly applied dual-light aPDT reduces inflammation in the dental implant adjacent tissues. Dual-light aPDT approach holds promise as an effective home care tool for implant patients.
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Experimental Dental Research aims to provide open access peer-reviewed publications of high scientific quality representing original clinical, diagnostic or experimental work within all disciplines and fields of oral medicine and dentistry. The scope of Clinical and Experimental Dental Research comprises original research material on the anatomy, physiology and pathology of oro-facial, oro-pharyngeal and maxillofacial tissues, and functions and dysfunctions within the stomatognathic system, and the epidemiology, aetiology, prevention, diagnosis, prognosis and therapy of diseases and conditions that have an effect on the homeostasis of the mouth, jaws, and closely associated structures, as well as the healing and regeneration and the clinical aspects of replacement of hard and soft tissues with biomaterials, and the rehabilitation of stomatognathic functions. Studies that bring new knowledge on how to advance health on the individual or public health levels, including interactions between oral and general health and ill-health are welcome.