Sexual Assault, Female Immigrant Victims, and Judicial Focal Concerns in U.S. and Canadian Courts

IF 1.8 2区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Sidra Hashmi, Jonathan C. Reid, Samantha J. Brown
{"title":"Sexual Assault, Female Immigrant Victims, and Judicial Focal Concerns in U.S. and Canadian Courts","authors":"Sidra Hashmi,&nbsp;Jonathan C. Reid,&nbsp;Samantha J. Brown","doi":"10.1007/s12103-025-09797-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study draws on the focal concerns perspective to explore the persistence of rape myths in U.S. and Canadian court cases involving immigrant women survivors. Results from qualitative content analysis of judicial rhetoric in both countries from 1996 to 2021 reveal a nuanced picture. Notably, judges reinforced some rape myths by, for example, being less likely to uphold convictions in cases that did not involve weapons or that occurred in private settings. However, judges challenged rape myths, with some judges explicitly considering the vulnerability of immigrant women, further contributing to the complexities of their decision-making process.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51509,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Criminal Justice","volume":"50 3","pages":"510 - 540"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12103-025-09797-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study draws on the focal concerns perspective to explore the persistence of rape myths in U.S. and Canadian court cases involving immigrant women survivors. Results from qualitative content analysis of judicial rhetoric in both countries from 1996 to 2021 reveal a nuanced picture. Notably, judges reinforced some rape myths by, for example, being less likely to uphold convictions in cases that did not involve weapons or that occurred in private settings. However, judges challenged rape myths, with some judges explicitly considering the vulnerability of immigrant women, further contributing to the complexities of their decision-making process.

美国和加拿大法院的性侵犯、女性移民受害者和司法焦点问题
本研究利用焦点关注的视角,探讨美国和加拿大涉及移民妇女幸存者的法庭案件中强奸神话的持久性。1996年至2021年两国司法修辞学的定性内容分析结果揭示了一幅微妙的图景。值得注意的是,法官强化了一些强奸迷思,例如,在不涉及武器或发生在私人场合的案件中,法官不太可能维持定罪。然而,法官对强奸神话提出了质疑,一些法官明确考虑到移民妇女的脆弱性,这进一步增加了他们决策过程的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Criminal Justice
American Journal of Criminal Justice CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
5.40%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Criminal Justice, the official journal of the Southern Criminal Justice Association, is a peer reviewed publication; manuscripts go through a blind review process. The focus of the Journal is on a wide array of criminal justice topics and issues. Some of these concerns include items pertaining to the criminal justice process, the formal and informal interplay between system components, problems and solutions experienced by various segments, innovative practices, policy development and implementation, evaluative research, the players engaged in these enterprises, and a wide assortment of other related interests. The American Journal of Criminal Justice publishes original articles that utilize a broad range of methodologies and perspectives when examining crime, law, and criminal justice processing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信