Anti-Amyloid Agents: A Self-Fulfilling prophecy

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Alexandros Giannakis, Spiridon Konitsiotis
{"title":"Anti-Amyloid Agents: A Self-Fulfilling prophecy","authors":"Alexandros Giannakis,&nbsp;Spiridon Konitsiotis","doi":"10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The introduction of anti-amyloid antibodies has ushered in a new era in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), coinciding with the revision of its diagnostic criteria, which now focus on the biological definition of AD, with amyloid beta at its core. However, despite being fully aligned with these criteria—and therefore with how we define the disease—amyloid-targeting therapies have not yielded the expected results. How can a treatment targeting the very core of the disease be ineffective? Perhaps because AD, as we have defined it, is not actually the disease that afflicts millions of patients worldwide. Patients with conditions related to AD, such as apolipoprotein ε4 allele (APOE4) homozygotes, patients receiving anticoagulant therapy for atrial fibrillation, and those with microhemorrhages, are excluded from treatment. Several other pathogenetic mechanisms continue to arise, including neuroinflammation, cerebrovascular disease, and metal ion dysregulation. At the same time, Alzheimer’s pathology frequently coexists with other brain pathologies in AD patients, the roles and interactions of which remain largely unknown. Thus, AD should be redefined as a multifactorial neurodegenerative disorder, in which various processes contribute to amyloid accumulation or independently drive neurodegeneration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15487,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 111338"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967586825003108","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The introduction of anti-amyloid antibodies has ushered in a new era in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), coinciding with the revision of its diagnostic criteria, which now focus on the biological definition of AD, with amyloid beta at its core. However, despite being fully aligned with these criteria—and therefore with how we define the disease—amyloid-targeting therapies have not yielded the expected results. How can a treatment targeting the very core of the disease be ineffective? Perhaps because AD, as we have defined it, is not actually the disease that afflicts millions of patients worldwide. Patients with conditions related to AD, such as apolipoprotein ε4 allele (APOE4) homozygotes, patients receiving anticoagulant therapy for atrial fibrillation, and those with microhemorrhages, are excluded from treatment. Several other pathogenetic mechanisms continue to arise, including neuroinflammation, cerebrovascular disease, and metal ion dysregulation. At the same time, Alzheimer’s pathology frequently coexists with other brain pathologies in AD patients, the roles and interactions of which remain largely unknown. Thus, AD should be redefined as a multifactorial neurodegenerative disorder, in which various processes contribute to amyloid accumulation or independently drive neurodegeneration.
抗淀粉样蛋白制剂:一个自我实现的预言
抗淀粉样蛋白抗体的引入开启了阿尔茨海默病(AD)治疗的新时代,同时也修订了其诊断标准,现在将重点放在阿尔茨海默病的生物学定义上,并以淀粉样蛋白为核心。然而,尽管淀粉样蛋白靶向治疗完全符合这些标准,因此也符合我们对疾病的定义,但并没有产生预期的结果。针对疾病核心的治疗怎么会无效呢?也许是因为阿尔茨海默病,正如我们所定义的那样,实际上并不是折磨全世界数百万患者的疾病。与AD相关的患者,如载脂蛋白ε4等位基因(APOE4)纯合子,接受房颤抗凝治疗的患者,以及有微出血的患者,均被排除在治疗之外。一些其他的发病机制继续出现,包括神经炎症、脑血管疾病和金属离子失调。同时,阿尔茨海默病的病理常常与AD患者的其他脑病理共存,其作用和相互作用在很大程度上仍然未知。因此,AD应该被重新定义为一种多因素的神经退行性疾病,其中各种过程导致淀粉样蛋白积累或独立驱动神经退行性疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
402
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: This International journal, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, publishes articles on clinical neurosurgery and neurology and the related neurosciences such as neuro-pathology, neuro-radiology, neuro-ophthalmology and neuro-physiology. The journal has a broad International perspective, and emphasises the advances occurring in Asia, the Pacific Rim region, Europe and North America. The Journal acts as a focus for publication of major clinical and laboratory research, as well as publishing solicited manuscripts on specific subjects from experts, case reports and other information of interest to clinicians working in the clinical neurosciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信