Women's tenure security on collective lands: A conceptual framework

IF 5.1 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Ruth Meinzen-Dick , Cheryl Doss , Fiona Flintan , Rachael Knight , Anne M. Larson , Iliana Monterroso
{"title":"Women's tenure security on collective lands: A conceptual framework","authors":"Ruth Meinzen-Dick ,&nbsp;Cheryl Doss ,&nbsp;Fiona Flintan ,&nbsp;Rachael Knight ,&nbsp;Anne M. Larson ,&nbsp;Iliana Monterroso","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Within discussions of land and resource rights, there is growing attention to women's rights, mostly in terms of household and individual rights to private property. This leaves unanswered questions about whether and how women's land rights can be secured under collective tenure, upon which billions of people worldwide depend. There is an important gap in conceptual tools, empirical understanding, and policy recommendations on this topic. To address this gap and lay the foundations for a sound body of empirical studies and appropriate policies, we develop a conceptual framework to improve understanding of women's land rights under collective tenure. We discuss what secure tenure for women on collective lands would entail, then what factors would affect women's tenure security. We give attention to particularities of rangelands, forests, and other types of collective lands as well as commonalities across types. A key theme that emerges is that for women to have secure tenure under collective tenure, the collective (group) itself must have tenure security and the women must have secure rights within this collective. The latter requires us to consider the governance structures, how men and women access and control land, and the extent to which women have voice and power within the collective. More consistent analyses of collective tenure systems using the conceptual framework presented in this paper can help to identify which action resources are important for groups to secure rights to collective lands, and for women to advocate for their rights within the group.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 103694"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016725001342","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Within discussions of land and resource rights, there is growing attention to women's rights, mostly in terms of household and individual rights to private property. This leaves unanswered questions about whether and how women's land rights can be secured under collective tenure, upon which billions of people worldwide depend. There is an important gap in conceptual tools, empirical understanding, and policy recommendations on this topic. To address this gap and lay the foundations for a sound body of empirical studies and appropriate policies, we develop a conceptual framework to improve understanding of women's land rights under collective tenure. We discuss what secure tenure for women on collective lands would entail, then what factors would affect women's tenure security. We give attention to particularities of rangelands, forests, and other types of collective lands as well as commonalities across types. A key theme that emerges is that for women to have secure tenure under collective tenure, the collective (group) itself must have tenure security and the women must have secure rights within this collective. The latter requires us to consider the governance structures, how men and women access and control land, and the extent to which women have voice and power within the collective. More consistent analyses of collective tenure systems using the conceptual framework presented in this paper can help to identify which action resources are important for groups to secure rights to collective lands, and for women to advocate for their rights within the group.
妇女对集体土地保有权的保障:一个概念框架
在关于土地和资源权利的讨论中,越来越注意到妇女的权利,主要是在家庭和个人对私有财产的权利方面。这就留下了一个悬而未决的问题,即在全球数十亿人赖以生存的集体土地使用权下,妇女的土地权能否得到保障以及如何得到保障。在这一主题的概念工具、经验理解和政策建议方面存在重要差距。为了弥补这一差距,并为完善的实证研究和适当的政策奠定基础,我们制定了一个概念性框架,以提高对集体所有制下妇女土地权利的理解。我们讨论了妇女在集体土地上的安全保有权意味着什么,然后讨论了影响妇女保有权安全的因素。我们关注牧场、森林和其他类型的集体土地的特殊性以及不同类型的共性。其中出现的一个关键主题是,为了使妇女在集体权属下享有有保障的权属,集体(集团)本身必须有权属保障,妇女必须在这个集体中享有有保障的权利。后者要求我们考虑治理结构,男性和女性如何获得和控制土地,以及女性在集体中拥有发言权和权力的程度。利用本文提出的概念框架对集体保有权制度进行更一致的分析,有助于确定哪些行动资源对群体确保集体土地权利和妇女在群体内倡导其权利是重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信