Extending from reutilization to by-product service: A life-cycle environmental, economic, and risk assessment of heavy metal-containing hazardous waste recycling

IF 7.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
YuJiong Xu , Xiaojiao Xu , Long Wen , Yao Wang
{"title":"Extending from reutilization to by-product service: A life-cycle environmental, economic, and risk assessment of heavy metal-containing hazardous waste recycling","authors":"YuJiong Xu ,&nbsp;Xiaojiao Xu ,&nbsp;Long Wen ,&nbsp;Yao Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.wasman.2025.114898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The application of waste-derived construction materials represents a critical pathway for high-value reutilization of inorganic heavy metal-containing hazardous wastes, but still poses uncertain environmental risks from residual pollutants within by-products. However, current feasibility assessments of emerging technologies focus primarily on environmental and economic comparative analyses,<!--> <!-->fails to adequately address the acceptability of potentially pollutant leaching during long-term by-product service, rendering it insufficient. To address this gap, this study presents an extended life-cycle environmental, economic, and risk assessment framework that includes both the reutilization process and the long-term service phase of waste-derived by-products. Using municipal solid waste incinerator fly ash (MSWI FA) as a case, three utilization pathways are evaluated with the proposed framework: (1) co-sintering with zinc-containing waste (FA-SZn), (2) dioxin degradation followed by water-washing (FA-Wash), and (3) co-processing in cement kilns for clinker production (FA-Clinker). Results show that, the emerging FA-SZn outperforms industrialized FA-Wash and FA-Clinker due to the benefits of metal recovery in terms of environmental and economic performance. Additionally, risk assessment demonstrates that FA-SZn-derived supplementary cementitious materials are safer for roadway applications than FA-Wash, with 25.32–49.38% and 39.75–78.80% reductions in non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks, respectively. These findings highlight the advantages of emerging MSWI FA reutilization pathway and provide a comprehensive framework for quantifying life-cycle benefits in heavy metal-containing hazardous waste reutilization, supporting sustainable and safe waste recovery strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23969,"journal":{"name":"Waste management","volume":"203 ","pages":"Article 114898"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Waste management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X25003095","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The application of waste-derived construction materials represents a critical pathway for high-value reutilization of inorganic heavy metal-containing hazardous wastes, but still poses uncertain environmental risks from residual pollutants within by-products. However, current feasibility assessments of emerging technologies focus primarily on environmental and economic comparative analyses, fails to adequately address the acceptability of potentially pollutant leaching during long-term by-product service, rendering it insufficient. To address this gap, this study presents an extended life-cycle environmental, economic, and risk assessment framework that includes both the reutilization process and the long-term service phase of waste-derived by-products. Using municipal solid waste incinerator fly ash (MSWI FA) as a case, three utilization pathways are evaluated with the proposed framework: (1) co-sintering with zinc-containing waste (FA-SZn), (2) dioxin degradation followed by water-washing (FA-Wash), and (3) co-processing in cement kilns for clinker production (FA-Clinker). Results show that, the emerging FA-SZn outperforms industrialized FA-Wash and FA-Clinker due to the benefits of metal recovery in terms of environmental and economic performance. Additionally, risk assessment demonstrates that FA-SZn-derived supplementary cementitious materials are safer for roadway applications than FA-Wash, with 25.32–49.38% and 39.75–78.80% reductions in non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks, respectively. These findings highlight the advantages of emerging MSWI FA reutilization pathway and provide a comprehensive framework for quantifying life-cycle benefits in heavy metal-containing hazardous waste reutilization, supporting sustainable and safe waste recovery strategies.
从再利用延伸到副产品服务:含重金属危险废物回收的生命周期环境、经济和风险评估
废物衍生建筑材料的应用是无机重金属危险废物高价值再利用的重要途径,但副产品中残留污染物仍构成不确定的环境风险。然而,目前对新兴技术的可行性评估主要集中在环境和经济比较分析上,未能充分处理在长期副产品服务期间可能出现的污染物浸出的可接受性,使其不够充分。为了解决这一差距,本研究提出了一个延长生命周期的环境、经济和风险评估框架,其中包括废物衍生副产品的再利用过程和长期服务阶段。以城市生活垃圾焚烧炉飞灰(MSWI FA)为例,在提出的框架下评估了三种利用途径:(1)与含锌废物共烧结(FA- szn),(2)降解二恶英后水洗(FA- wash),以及(3)在水泥窑中共处理生产熟料(FA- clinker)。结果表明,由于金属回收在环境和经济性能方面的优势,新兴的FA-SZn优于工业化的FA-Wash和fa -熟料。此外,风险评估表明,fa - szn衍生的补充胶凝材料在道路应用中比FA-Wash更安全,非致癌风险和致癌风险分别降低25.32-49.38%和39.75-78.80%。这些发现突出了新兴的城市生活垃圾再利用途径的优势,并为量化含重金属危险废物再利用的生命周期效益提供了一个全面的框架,支持可持续和安全的废物回收战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Waste management
Waste management 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
492
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Waste Management is devoted to the presentation and discussion of information on solid wastes,it covers the entire lifecycle of solid. wastes. Scope: Addresses solid wastes in both industrialized and economically developing countries Covers various types of solid wastes, including: Municipal (e.g., residential, institutional, commercial, light industrial) Agricultural Special (e.g., C and D, healthcare, household hazardous wastes, sewage sludge)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信