A composite surface registration method for freeform surface evaluation based on ICP coarse registration and PSO fine registration

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q2 OPTICS
Yusheng Zang , Changsheng Li , Jiajun Tang , Zhaoxiang Chen , Jianjun Ding , Shuming Yang , Zhuangde Jiang
{"title":"A composite surface registration method for freeform surface evaluation based on ICP coarse registration and PSO fine registration","authors":"Yusheng Zang ,&nbsp;Changsheng Li ,&nbsp;Jiajun Tang ,&nbsp;Zhaoxiang Chen ,&nbsp;Jianjun Ding ,&nbsp;Shuming Yang ,&nbsp;Zhuangde Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.optlaseng.2025.109079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The assessment of form error for freeform surfaces is crucial for ensuring the machining accuracy of optical components and performing potential subsequent error correction. Although the traditional iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm is widely used for surface registration due to its simplicity and broad applicability, it has limitations such as sensitivity to initial optimization positions, which seriously affect the accuracy of registration. For this reason, this paper proposes a composite surface registration method based on ICP for coarse registration and particle swarm optimization (PSO) for fine registration. First, the influence of six mounting errors on the form accuracy is discussed through error sensitivity analysis. Second, the characteristics of the ICP algorithm and the PSO algorithm in surface registration are comparatively analyzed in aspects of accuracy and efficiency. Finally, the composite registration method is successfully applied to the surface registration of the freeform surfaces. The results show that the composite registration method has achieved 88.4 % and 1.4 % decrease in registration error compared to the ICP algorithm when processing the freeform suction cup and silicon mirror, respectively. Additionally, the computational time is reduced by 40 % and 20 % compared to the PSO algorithm, respectively. Even when compared to advanced hybrid registration algorithms combining genetic algorithms (GA) and ICP algorithms, the proposed method in this paper still maintains advantages in terms of registration accuracy and efficiency.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49719,"journal":{"name":"Optics and Lasers in Engineering","volume":"193 ","pages":"Article 109079"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optics and Lasers in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143816625002659","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The assessment of form error for freeform surfaces is crucial for ensuring the machining accuracy of optical components and performing potential subsequent error correction. Although the traditional iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm is widely used for surface registration due to its simplicity and broad applicability, it has limitations such as sensitivity to initial optimization positions, which seriously affect the accuracy of registration. For this reason, this paper proposes a composite surface registration method based on ICP for coarse registration and particle swarm optimization (PSO) for fine registration. First, the influence of six mounting errors on the form accuracy is discussed through error sensitivity analysis. Second, the characteristics of the ICP algorithm and the PSO algorithm in surface registration are comparatively analyzed in aspects of accuracy and efficiency. Finally, the composite registration method is successfully applied to the surface registration of the freeform surfaces. The results show that the composite registration method has achieved 88.4 % and 1.4 % decrease in registration error compared to the ICP algorithm when processing the freeform suction cup and silicon mirror, respectively. Additionally, the computational time is reduced by 40 % and 20 % compared to the PSO algorithm, respectively. Even when compared to advanced hybrid registration algorithms combining genetic algorithms (GA) and ICP algorithms, the proposed method in this paper still maintains advantages in terms of registration accuracy and efficiency.
一种基于ICP粗配准和PSO精细配准的自由曲面评价复合配准方法
自由曲面的形状误差评估对于保证光学元件的加工精度和进行潜在的后续误差校正至关重要。传统的迭代最近点(ICP)算法因其简单、适用性广而被广泛应用于曲面配准,但其对初始优化位置的敏感性等局限性严重影响了配准的精度。为此,本文提出了一种基于ICP的粗糙配准和基于粒子群优化(PSO)的精细配准的复合表面配准方法。首先,通过误差灵敏度分析,讨论了六种安装误差对成形精度的影响。其次,比较分析了ICP算法和粒子群算法在曲面配准中的精度和效率特点;最后,将复合配准方法成功应用于自由曲面的表面配准。结果表明,与ICP算法相比,复合配准方法对自由曲面吸盘和硅镜的配准误差分别降低了88.4%和1.4%。此外,与粒子群算法相比,计算时间分别减少了40%和20%。即使与先进的遗传算法(GA)和ICP算法相结合的混合配准算法相比,本文方法在配准精度和效率方面仍然保持优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Optics and Lasers in Engineering
Optics and Lasers in Engineering 工程技术-光学
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
384
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Optics and Lasers in Engineering aims at providing an international forum for the interchange of information on the development of optical techniques and laser technology in engineering. Emphasis is placed on contributions targeted at the practical use of methods and devices, the development and enhancement of solutions and new theoretical concepts for experimental methods. Optics and Lasers in Engineering reflects the main areas in which optical methods are being used and developed for an engineering environment. Manuscripts should offer clear evidence of novelty and significance. Papers focusing on parameter optimization or computational issues are not suitable. Similarly, papers focussed on an application rather than the optical method fall outside the journal''s scope. The scope of the journal is defined to include the following: -Optical Metrology- Optical Methods for 3D visualization and virtual engineering- Optical Techniques for Microsystems- Imaging, Microscopy and Adaptive Optics- Computational Imaging- Laser methods in manufacturing- Integrated optical and photonic sensors- Optics and Photonics in Life Science- Hyperspectral and spectroscopic methods- Infrared and Terahertz techniques
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信