Higher serum uric acid levels and risk of all-cause mortality in general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Md Golam Rabbani , Sheikh M. Alif , Cammie Tran , Amanda J. Rickard , Lisa Demos , John J. McNeil , Md Nazmul Karim
{"title":"Higher serum uric acid levels and risk of all-cause mortality in general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Md Golam Rabbani ,&nbsp;Sheikh M. Alif ,&nbsp;Cammie Tran ,&nbsp;Amanda J. Rickard ,&nbsp;Lisa Demos ,&nbsp;John J. McNeil ,&nbsp;Md Nazmul Karim","doi":"10.1016/j.metop.2025.100371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Population-based studies have reported a relationship between high serum uric acid (SUA) levels and all-cause mortality; however, findings are inconsistent. To address this issue, we conducted a meta-analysis of general population-based studies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Ovid Medline, EMBASE, and Web of science to identify relevant peer-reviewed articles using pre-specified search terms. Population-based cohort studies investigating the association between SUA levels and all-cause mortality were included. Risk ratios (RR) for all-cause mortality were calculated for higher and lower SUA levels based on data reporting on exposure and outcome. A meta-analysis based on a log-transformed random effect maximum likelihood model was used to obtain summary risk estimates. Heterogeneity was assessed through subgroup analysis and meta-regression of the study-level covariates.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-four studies with more than 2.5 million participants were identified and analysed. Higher SUA levels were associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (RR: 1.32; 95 % confidence intervals (CIs):1.26–1.39, p &lt; 0.001). The risk of mortality was higher in women (RR:1.91; 95 %CI:1.40–2.61, p &lt; 0.001) compared to men (RR:1.16; 95 %CI:1.08 1.24, p &lt; 0.001). Subgroup analyses suggested that middle-aged adults (RR: 1.52, 95 %CI: 1.35–1.68), individuals living in OECD countries (RR:1.39, 95 %CI:1.28–1.49) and those of Caucasian ethnicity (RR:1.43, 95 %CI:1.35–1.51) reported a greater impact of elevated SUA levels on all-cause mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Higher SUA levels were associated with a significant increase in the risk of all-cause mortality, with women appearing to be at greater risk than men. These findings highlight the need for research into mechanisms underlying the association between SUA and mortality and the reason for the sex difference identified.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94141,"journal":{"name":"Metabolism open","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 100371"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metabolism open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589936825000271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Population-based studies have reported a relationship between high serum uric acid (SUA) levels and all-cause mortality; however, findings are inconsistent. To address this issue, we conducted a meta-analysis of general population-based studies.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Ovid Medline, EMBASE, and Web of science to identify relevant peer-reviewed articles using pre-specified search terms. Population-based cohort studies investigating the association between SUA levels and all-cause mortality were included. Risk ratios (RR) for all-cause mortality were calculated for higher and lower SUA levels based on data reporting on exposure and outcome. A meta-analysis based on a log-transformed random effect maximum likelihood model was used to obtain summary risk estimates. Heterogeneity was assessed through subgroup analysis and meta-regression of the study-level covariates.

Results

Thirty-four studies with more than 2.5 million participants were identified and analysed. Higher SUA levels were associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (RR: 1.32; 95 % confidence intervals (CIs):1.26–1.39, p < 0.001). The risk of mortality was higher in women (RR:1.91; 95 %CI:1.40–2.61, p < 0.001) compared to men (RR:1.16; 95 %CI:1.08 1.24, p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses suggested that middle-aged adults (RR: 1.52, 95 %CI: 1.35–1.68), individuals living in OECD countries (RR:1.39, 95 %CI:1.28–1.49) and those of Caucasian ethnicity (RR:1.43, 95 %CI:1.35–1.51) reported a greater impact of elevated SUA levels on all-cause mortality.

Conclusions

Higher SUA levels were associated with a significant increase in the risk of all-cause mortality, with women appearing to be at greater risk than men. These findings highlight the need for research into mechanisms underlying the association between SUA and mortality and the reason for the sex difference identified.
高血清尿酸水平与普通人群全因死亡风险:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:基于人群的研究已经报道了高血清尿酸(SUA)水平与全因死亡率之间的关系;然而,研究结果并不一致。为了解决这个问题,我们对一般人群为基础的研究进行了荟萃分析。方法系统检索PubMed、Ovid Medline、EMBASE和Web of science,使用预设检索词检索相关同行评议文章。以人群为基础的队列研究调查了SUA水平与全因死亡率之间的关系。根据报告暴露和结果的数据,计算高和低SUA水平的全因死亡率风险比(RR)。基于对数变换随机效应最大似然模型的荟萃分析被用于获得汇总风险估计。通过亚组分析和研究水平协变量的元回归来评估异质性。结果确认并分析了34项研究,参与者超过250万人。高SUA水平与全因死亡风险增加相关(RR: 1.32;95%置信区间(ci): 1.26-1.39, p <;0.001)。女性的死亡风险更高(RR:1.91;95% CI: 1.40-2.61, p <;0.001),与男性相比(RR:1.16;95% CI:1.08 1.24, p <;0.001)。亚组分析表明,中年人(RR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.35-1.68)、生活在经合组织国家的个体(RR:1.39, 95% CI: 1.28-1.49)和高加索人种(RR:1.43, 95% CI: 1.35-1.51)报告了SUA水平升高对全因死亡率的更大影响。结论较高的SUA水平与全因死亡风险的显著增加相关,女性的风险似乎高于男性。这些发现强调有必要研究SUA与死亡率之间关联的潜在机制,以及确定性别差异的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Metabolism open
Metabolism open Agricultural and Biological Sciences (General), Endocrinology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
40 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信