Integrated DDPG-PSO energy management systems for enhanced battery cycling and efficient grid utilization

IF 8 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Oladimeji Ibrahim , Mohd Junaidi Abdul Aziz , Razman Ayop , Wen Yao Low , Nor Zaihar Yahaya , Ahmed Tijjani Dahiru , Temitope Ibrahim Amosa , Shehu Lukman Ayinla
{"title":"Integrated DDPG-PSO energy management systems for enhanced battery cycling and efficient grid utilization","authors":"Oladimeji Ibrahim ,&nbsp;Mohd Junaidi Abdul Aziz ,&nbsp;Razman Ayop ,&nbsp;Wen Yao Low ,&nbsp;Nor Zaihar Yahaya ,&nbsp;Ahmed Tijjani Dahiru ,&nbsp;Temitope Ibrahim Amosa ,&nbsp;Shehu Lukman Ayinla","doi":"10.1016/j.nexus.2025.100448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Effective energy management is crucial in hybrid energy systems for optimal resource utilization and cost savings. This study integrates Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG) with Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) to enhance exploration and exploitation in the optimization process, aiming to improve energy resource utilization and reduce costs in hybrid energy systems. The integrated DDPG-PSO approach leverages DDPG's reinforcement learning and PSO's global search capabilities to enhance optimization solution quality. The PSO optimizes the DDPG actor-network parameters, providing a strong initial policy. DDPG then fine-tunes these parameters by interacting with the energy system, making decisions on battery scheduling and grid usage to maximize cost rewards. The results show that the integrated DDPG-PSO EMS outperforms the traditional DDPG in terms of battery scheduling and grid utilization efficiency. Cost evaluations under critical peak tariffs indicate that both EMS algorithms achieved a 34 % cost saving compared to a grid-only system. Under differential grid tariffs, the proposed DDPG-PSO approach achieved a 28 % cost reduction, outperforming the standalone DDPG, which achieved a 25 % saving. Notably, the DDPG-PSO effectively reduced overall grid dependency, yielding a total operational cost of $665.19, compared to $780.70 for the DDPG. resenting a 14.8 % reduction. The battery charge/discharge profiles further highlight the advantages of the DDPG-PSO strategy. It demonstrated more stable and efficient energy flow behavior, characterized by shallow cycling and partial discharges sustained over several hours. In contrast, the DDPG exhibited more aggressive deep cycling, fluctuating frequently between minimum and maximum charge levels. This improved energy flow management by DDPG-PSO not only reduces wear on the battery system but also promotes long-term sustainability and reliability in hybrid energy management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93548,"journal":{"name":"Energy nexus","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100448"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy nexus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427125000890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effective energy management is crucial in hybrid energy systems for optimal resource utilization and cost savings. This study integrates Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG) with Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) to enhance exploration and exploitation in the optimization process, aiming to improve energy resource utilization and reduce costs in hybrid energy systems. The integrated DDPG-PSO approach leverages DDPG's reinforcement learning and PSO's global search capabilities to enhance optimization solution quality. The PSO optimizes the DDPG actor-network parameters, providing a strong initial policy. DDPG then fine-tunes these parameters by interacting with the energy system, making decisions on battery scheduling and grid usage to maximize cost rewards. The results show that the integrated DDPG-PSO EMS outperforms the traditional DDPG in terms of battery scheduling and grid utilization efficiency. Cost evaluations under critical peak tariffs indicate that both EMS algorithms achieved a 34 % cost saving compared to a grid-only system. Under differential grid tariffs, the proposed DDPG-PSO approach achieved a 28 % cost reduction, outperforming the standalone DDPG, which achieved a 25 % saving. Notably, the DDPG-PSO effectively reduced overall grid dependency, yielding a total operational cost of $665.19, compared to $780.70 for the DDPG. resenting a 14.8 % reduction. The battery charge/discharge profiles further highlight the advantages of the DDPG-PSO strategy. It demonstrated more stable and efficient energy flow behavior, characterized by shallow cycling and partial discharges sustained over several hours. In contrast, the DDPG exhibited more aggressive deep cycling, fluctuating frequently between minimum and maximum charge levels. This improved energy flow management by DDPG-PSO not only reduces wear on the battery system but also promotes long-term sustainability and reliability in hybrid energy management.
集成DDPG-PSO能量管理系统,增强电池循环和有效的电网利用
在混合能源系统中,有效的能源管理对于优化资源利用和节约成本至关重要。本研究将深度确定性策略梯度(Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient, DDPG)与粒子群优化(Particle Swarm Optimization, PSO)相结合,加强优化过程中的勘探开发,旨在提高混合能源系统的能源资源利用率,降低成本。集成的DDPG-PSO方法利用DDPG的强化学习和PSO的全局搜索能力来提高优化解决方案的质量。PSO优化了DDPG参与者网络参数,提供了一个强初始策略。然后,DDPG通过与能源系统互动,对这些参数进行微调,做出电池调度和电网使用的决定,以最大限度地提高成本回报。结果表明,集成的DDPG- pso EMS在电池调度和电网利用效率方面优于传统的DDPG。关键峰值电价下的成本评估表明,与纯电网系统相比,两种EMS算法都节省了34%的成本。在不同的电网费率下,提出的DDPG- pso方法可以降低28%的成本,优于独立的DDPG,后者可以节省25%的成本。值得注意的是,DDPG- pso有效地降低了对电网的总体依赖,总运营成本为665.19美元,而DDPG的运营成本为780.70美元。怨恨14.8%的减少。电池充放电曲线进一步凸显了DDPG-PSO策略的优势。它表现出更稳定和高效的能量流动行为,其特征是浅循环和持续数小时的部分放电。相比之下,DDPG表现出更强的深度循环,在最小和最大电荷水平之间频繁波动。通过DDPG-PSO改进的能量流管理不仅减少了电池系统的磨损,而且促进了混合能源管理的长期可持续性和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy nexus
Energy nexus Energy (General), Ecological Modelling, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Water Science and Technology, Agricultural and Biological Sciences (General)
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
109 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信