Cosmetic gatekeepers: Negotiations of beauty and (re)shaping bodies by medical aesthetic practitioners

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Anne-Mette Hermans , Rebecca Nash
{"title":"Cosmetic gatekeepers: Negotiations of beauty and (re)shaping bodies by medical aesthetic practitioners","authors":"Anne-Mette Hermans ,&nbsp;Rebecca Nash","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Aesthetic practitioners who administer (non-)surgical medical cosmetic procedures play a central, and growing, role in the (re)shaping of predominantly women's bodies. This article focuses on how these practitioners negotiate their role as cosmetic gatekeepers – those with the medical and sociocultural skills, knowledge and tools - in (re)shaping the bodies of their client-patients. Adopting a reflexive thematic analysis of interviews conducted with aesthetic practitioners in the UK and the Netherlands, we identify three main themes. The first theme, <em>conceptualizing beauty</em>, describes the different ways in which aesthetic practitioners describe and negotiate the concept of ‘beauty’, including discussions of beauty as both subjective and objective. The second theme, <em>shaping bodies</em>, explores how practitioners consider why and how they (do not) suggest aesthetic procedures and how they (do not) see themselves as significant shapers of bodies and beauty. Finally, the theme of <em>cosmetic gatekeepers</em> examines the ways in which aesthetic practitioners provide boundaries in terms of how, when, why and on whom they (do not) perform procedures. Inherent to these discussions are constructions of the (non-)surgical ‘other’ and tensions between commercialism and ‘medico-cosmetic’ considerations that must be navigated by aesthetic practitioners. This article furthers explorations of how certain aesthetic appearances are (re)produced as desirable in increasingly expansive, diversified and normalized (non-)surgical cosmetic servicescapes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"380 ","pages":"Article 118165"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625004952","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aesthetic practitioners who administer (non-)surgical medical cosmetic procedures play a central, and growing, role in the (re)shaping of predominantly women's bodies. This article focuses on how these practitioners negotiate their role as cosmetic gatekeepers – those with the medical and sociocultural skills, knowledge and tools - in (re)shaping the bodies of their client-patients. Adopting a reflexive thematic analysis of interviews conducted with aesthetic practitioners in the UK and the Netherlands, we identify three main themes. The first theme, conceptualizing beauty, describes the different ways in which aesthetic practitioners describe and negotiate the concept of ‘beauty’, including discussions of beauty as both subjective and objective. The second theme, shaping bodies, explores how practitioners consider why and how they (do not) suggest aesthetic procedures and how they (do not) see themselves as significant shapers of bodies and beauty. Finally, the theme of cosmetic gatekeepers examines the ways in which aesthetic practitioners provide boundaries in terms of how, when, why and on whom they (do not) perform procedures. Inherent to these discussions are constructions of the (non-)surgical ‘other’ and tensions between commercialism and ‘medico-cosmetic’ considerations that must be navigated by aesthetic practitioners. This article furthers explorations of how certain aesthetic appearances are (re)produced as desirable in increasingly expansive, diversified and normalized (non-)surgical cosmetic servicescapes.
美容看门人:美容和(重新)塑造身体的医疗美容从业者的谈判
实施(非)外科医疗美容程序的美学从业者在(重新)塑造主要是女性身体方面发挥着核心和日益增长的作用。这篇文章的重点是这些从业者如何协商他们作为美容看门人的角色-那些拥有医学和社会文化技能,知识和工具的人-在(重新)塑造他们的客户-患者的身体。通过对英国和荷兰的美学从业者进行访谈的反身性主题分析,我们确定了三个主要主题。第一个主题,概念化美,描述了审美实践者描述和讨论“美”概念的不同方式,包括对主观美和客观美的讨论。第二个主题,塑造身体,探讨从业者如何考虑他们(不)建议审美程序的原因和方式,以及他们(不)如何将自己视为身体和美的重要塑造者。最后,化妆品守门人的主题考察了美学从业者在如何、何时、为什么以及对谁(不)执行程序方面提供边界的方式。这些讨论的内在是对(非)外科“他者”的建构,以及商业主义和“医学美容”考虑之间的紧张关系,这些都必须由美学从业者来驾驭。本文进一步探讨了在日益扩大、多样化和规范化的(非)外科美容服务中,某些美学外观是如何(重新)产生的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信