Beyond Agriculture: Land Use Thresholds Governing Pesticide Mixture Risks in Megacity Surface Waters

IF 12.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Xinying Guo, Ying Luo, Huiyu Xie, Miao Chen, Jian Xu, Yeyao Wang, Andrew C. Johnson, Xiaowei Jin
{"title":"Beyond Agriculture: Land Use Thresholds Governing Pesticide Mixture Risks in Megacity Surface Waters","authors":"Xinying Guo, Ying Luo, Huiyu Xie, Miao Chen, Jian Xu, Yeyao Wang, Andrew C. Johnson, Xiaowei Jin","doi":"10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.138657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Growing concerns have emerged regarding the risks of pesticide mixtures in surface water ecosystems, yet the mechanisms through which human activities, especially land use patterns, affect these risks remain inadequately studied. This research presents an innovative approach, combining multi-scale land use analysis with pesticide risk assessment, quantifying relationships between mixed pesticide ecological risks and land use patterns. Findings indicate that the impacts of urban land use on pesticide ecological risks surpass the traditionally recognized agricultural effects, demonstrating significant spatial scale-dependent effects. Generalized additive model analysis reveals that 1−3<!-- --> <!-- -->km and 2−3<!-- --> <!-- -->km buffer zones represent the critical ranges where urban land use and cropland, respectively, have significant impacts on pesticide risks. Non-parametric change point analysis determined critical land use thresholds triggering significant ecological risk increases: 10−25% for cropland and 10−30% for urban areas. These discoveries provide crucial quantitative foundations for landscape planning and pesticide risk management. The results not only challenge traditional views of agricultural activities as primary pesticide sources but also provide new perspectives for pesticide pollution control and water quality management in large cities.","PeriodicalId":361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hazardous Materials","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hazardous Materials","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.138657","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Growing concerns have emerged regarding the risks of pesticide mixtures in surface water ecosystems, yet the mechanisms through which human activities, especially land use patterns, affect these risks remain inadequately studied. This research presents an innovative approach, combining multi-scale land use analysis with pesticide risk assessment, quantifying relationships between mixed pesticide ecological risks and land use patterns. Findings indicate that the impacts of urban land use on pesticide ecological risks surpass the traditionally recognized agricultural effects, demonstrating significant spatial scale-dependent effects. Generalized additive model analysis reveals that 1−3 km and 2−3 km buffer zones represent the critical ranges where urban land use and cropland, respectively, have significant impacts on pesticide risks. Non-parametric change point analysis determined critical land use thresholds triggering significant ecological risk increases: 10−25% for cropland and 10−30% for urban areas. These discoveries provide crucial quantitative foundations for landscape planning and pesticide risk management. The results not only challenge traditional views of agricultural activities as primary pesticide sources but also provide new perspectives for pesticide pollution control and water quality management in large cities.

Abstract Image

农业以外:超大城市地表水中控制农药混合风险的土地使用阈值
人们越来越关注地表水生态系统中农药混合物的风险,但人类活动,特别是土地利用模式影响这些风险的机制仍然没有得到充分的研究。本研究提出了一种将多尺度土地利用分析与农药风险评估相结合的创新方法,量化了混合农药生态风险与土地利用模式之间的关系。结果表明,城市土地利用对农药生态风险的影响超过了传统意义上的农业效应,呈现出显著的空间尺度依赖效应。广义加性模型分析表明,1 ~ 3 km和2 ~ 3 km缓冲区分别代表城市土地利用和农田对农药风险的显著影响的临界范围。非参数变化点分析确定了引发显著生态风险增加的关键土地利用阈值:农田为10 - 25%,城市地区为10 - 30%。这些发现为景观规划和农药风险管理提供了重要的定量基础。研究结果不仅挑战了农业活动是农药主要来源的传统观点,而且为大城市农药污染控制和水质管理提供了新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Journal of Hazardous Materials 工程技术-工程:环境
CiteScore
25.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
3059
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hazardous Materials serves as a global platform for promoting cutting-edge research in the field of Environmental Science and Engineering. Our publication features a wide range of articles, including full-length research papers, review articles, and perspectives, with the aim of enhancing our understanding of the dangers and risks associated with various materials concerning public health and the environment. It is important to note that the term "environmental contaminants" refers specifically to substances that pose hazardous effects through contamination, while excluding those that do not have such impacts on the environment or human health. Moreover, we emphasize the distinction between wastes and hazardous materials in order to provide further clarity on the scope of the journal. We have a keen interest in exploring specific compounds and microbial agents that have adverse effects on the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信