Outcomes and Predictors of Failure of Systemic-to-Pulmonary Shunts: Experience of a Single Institution Over 14 Years.

Hannah O Davis, Michael Johansen, Mark D Rodefeld, Mark W Turrentine, John W Brown, Jeremy L Herrmann
{"title":"Outcomes and Predictors of Failure of Systemic-to-Pulmonary Shunts: Experience of a Single Institution Over 14 Years.","authors":"Hannah O Davis, Michael Johansen, Mark D Rodefeld, Mark W Turrentine, John W Brown, Jeremy L Herrmann","doi":"10.1177/21501351251335646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundSystemic artery-to-pulmonary artery (SA-PA) shunts provide effective palliation for complex congenital heart disease (CHD) but carry a risk for morbidity and mortality. We aimed to comprehensively analyze our experience with SA-PA shunts.MethodsOur institutional Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database was queried to identify patients who underwent SA-PA shunts from 2009 to 2022, excluding those who underwent the Norwood procedure, right ventricle-PA shunt, or fenestrated patch. Definitions from the STS Congenital Heart Surgery Database Specifications were used. Shunt failure included dysfunction secondary to thrombosis, obstruction, stenosis, or outgrowth requiring intervention.ResultsA total of 287 patients met inclusion criteria. Shunts were placed at a median of 15.0 days (interquartile range 7.0-39.5). A thoracotomy approach was used in 178 out of 287 patients (62.0%), and cardiopulmonary bypass was employed in only 46 of 287 cases (16.0%). Survival to the next stage was 89.5% (246/275), with in-hospital mortality of 6.3% (18/287) and interstage mortality of 4.2% (12/287). Shunt failure occurred in 54/287 (18.8%), and 77/287 (26.8%) required reintervention for shunt-related complications. On multivariable analysis, poorer shunt failure-free survival was associated with any syndrome, left-sided arch vessel shunt origin, concurrent complex repairs, competitive flow from a patent ductus arteriosus, and delayed antiplatelet initiation. The thoracotomy approach was protective. Risk factors for worse survival to the next stage included shunt thrombosis and perioperative platelet transfusion.ConclusionsWhile complications remain common, our contemporary results demonstrate that SA-PA shunts remain a reliable palliation for CHD with insufficient pulmonary blood flow. Risk reduction may involve careful management of competitive pulmonary blood flow and prompt initiation of antiplatelet therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94270,"journal":{"name":"World journal for pediatric & congenital heart surgery","volume":" ","pages":"21501351251335646"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal for pediatric & congenital heart surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21501351251335646","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundSystemic artery-to-pulmonary artery (SA-PA) shunts provide effective palliation for complex congenital heart disease (CHD) but carry a risk for morbidity and mortality. We aimed to comprehensively analyze our experience with SA-PA shunts.MethodsOur institutional Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database was queried to identify patients who underwent SA-PA shunts from 2009 to 2022, excluding those who underwent the Norwood procedure, right ventricle-PA shunt, or fenestrated patch. Definitions from the STS Congenital Heart Surgery Database Specifications were used. Shunt failure included dysfunction secondary to thrombosis, obstruction, stenosis, or outgrowth requiring intervention.ResultsA total of 287 patients met inclusion criteria. Shunts were placed at a median of 15.0 days (interquartile range 7.0-39.5). A thoracotomy approach was used in 178 out of 287 patients (62.0%), and cardiopulmonary bypass was employed in only 46 of 287 cases (16.0%). Survival to the next stage was 89.5% (246/275), with in-hospital mortality of 6.3% (18/287) and interstage mortality of 4.2% (12/287). Shunt failure occurred in 54/287 (18.8%), and 77/287 (26.8%) required reintervention for shunt-related complications. On multivariable analysis, poorer shunt failure-free survival was associated with any syndrome, left-sided arch vessel shunt origin, concurrent complex repairs, competitive flow from a patent ductus arteriosus, and delayed antiplatelet initiation. The thoracotomy approach was protective. Risk factors for worse survival to the next stage included shunt thrombosis and perioperative platelet transfusion.ConclusionsWhile complications remain common, our contemporary results demonstrate that SA-PA shunts remain a reliable palliation for CHD with insufficient pulmonary blood flow. Risk reduction may involve careful management of competitive pulmonary blood flow and prompt initiation of antiplatelet therapy.

系统-肺分流失败的结果和预测因素:一个机构超过14年的经验。
背景:全身动脉到肺动脉(SA-PA)分流术为复杂先天性心脏病(CHD)提供了有效的缓解,但存在发病率和死亡率的风险。我们的目的是全面分析SA-PA分流术的经验。方法查询美国胸外科学会(STS)数据库,以确定2009年至2022年接受SA-PA分流术的患者,不包括接受诺伍德手术、右心室- pa分流术或开窗贴片的患者。使用STS先天性心脏手术数据库规范中的定义。分流失败包括继发于血栓形成、梗阻、狭窄或需要干预的生长外壁的功能障碍。结果287例患者符合纳入标准。分流器放置的中位数为15.0天(四分位数范围7.0-39.5)。287例患者中178例(62.0%)采用开胸入路,287例患者中仅46例(16.0%)采用体外循环。下一阶段生存率为89.5%(246/275),住院死亡率为6.3%(18/287),期间死亡率为4.2%(12/287)。54/287例(18.8%)发生分流失败,77/287例(26.8%)因分流相关并发症需要再次干预。在多变量分析中,较差的分流无故障生存率与任何综合征、左侧弓血管分流起源、并发复杂修复、动脉导管未闭的竞争性血流和延迟抗血小板启动有关。开胸入路是保护性的。下一阶段生存恶化的危险因素包括分流血栓形成和围手术期血小板输注。结论:虽然并发症仍然很常见,但我们当前的研究结果表明,SA-PA分流术仍然是治疗肺动脉血流不足的冠心病的可靠方法。降低风险可能涉及仔细管理竞争性肺血流和及时开始抗血小板治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信