Belatacept Conversion in Kidney Transplant Recipients with Congestive Heart Failure: Survival and 30-Day Readmission Outcomes

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
Harshitha Mogallapalli , Fauzia Osman , Sandesh Parajuli , Neetika Garg , Fahad Aziz , Arjang Djamali , Brad C. Astor , Maha A. Mohamed
{"title":"Belatacept Conversion in Kidney Transplant Recipients with Congestive Heart Failure: Survival and 30-Day Readmission Outcomes","authors":"Harshitha Mogallapalli ,&nbsp;Fauzia Osman ,&nbsp;Sandesh Parajuli ,&nbsp;Neetika Garg ,&nbsp;Fahad Aziz ,&nbsp;Arjang Djamali ,&nbsp;Brad C. Astor ,&nbsp;Maha A. Mohamed","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.03.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are deleterious to cardiovascular risk in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Data on the impact of belatacept on KTRs with congestive heart failure (CHF) are scarce. We hypothesized that conversion to belatacept will have better patient and graft survival and a lower rate of readmissions within 30 days after discharge compared with long-term CNI use. We analyzed data from KTRs admitted to CHF between 2014 and 2019. A total of 28 recipients converted to belatacept and were matched with 339 who continued on CNIs. There was no significant difference in patient demographics, or primary disease between the two groups. The adjusted hazard ratio associated with conversion was (0.87 [95% CI, 0.35-2.11] for death, (0.91, [95% CI, 0.39-2.13] for graft failure and (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.91, [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.90–4.06]) for 30-day postdischarge readmission between the two groups. Patients converted to belatacept were at a higher risk of rejection (adjusted hazard ratio, 13.8; 95% CI, 7.48–25.3). Patient and graft survival and 30-day readmission after CHF hospital discharge did not differ significantly between belatacept conversion and CNI continuation. The incidence of rejection was higher in the belatacept conversion group, suggesting a need for closer follow-up of patients on belatacept therapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23246,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":"57 5","pages":"Pages 771-776"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134525002209","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are deleterious to cardiovascular risk in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Data on the impact of belatacept on KTRs with congestive heart failure (CHF) are scarce. We hypothesized that conversion to belatacept will have better patient and graft survival and a lower rate of readmissions within 30 days after discharge compared with long-term CNI use. We analyzed data from KTRs admitted to CHF between 2014 and 2019. A total of 28 recipients converted to belatacept and were matched with 339 who continued on CNIs. There was no significant difference in patient demographics, or primary disease between the two groups. The adjusted hazard ratio associated with conversion was (0.87 [95% CI, 0.35-2.11] for death, (0.91, [95% CI, 0.39-2.13] for graft failure and (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.91, [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.90–4.06]) for 30-day postdischarge readmission between the two groups. Patients converted to belatacept were at a higher risk of rejection (adjusted hazard ratio, 13.8; 95% CI, 7.48–25.3). Patient and graft survival and 30-day readmission after CHF hospital discharge did not differ significantly between belatacept conversion and CNI continuation. The incidence of rejection was higher in the belatacept conversion group, suggesting a need for closer follow-up of patients on belatacept therapy.
充血性心力衰竭肾移植受者的Belatacept转换:生存和30天再入院结果。
钙调磷酸酶抑制剂(CNIs)对肾移植受者(KTRs)心血管风险有害。关于迟来接受对合并充血性心力衰竭(CHF)的ktr的影响的数据很少。我们假设,与长期使用CNI相比,改用belatacept将有更好的患者和移植物存活率,并且在出院后30天内再入院率更低。我们分析了2014年至2019年间入住瑞士法郎的KTRs的数据。总共有28名接受者转为使用belataccept,并与339名继续使用cni的人相匹配。两组患者在人口统计学和原发疾病方面没有显著差异。两组间与转归相关的校正风险比分别为:死亡(0.87 [95% CI, 0.35-2.11])、移植物衰竭(0.91,[95% CI, 0.39-2.13]、出院后30天再入院(校正风险比,1.91,[95%可信区间(CI), 0.90-4.06])。改用belatacept的患者发生排斥反应的风险较高(调整后的风险比为13.8;95% ci, 7.48-25.3)。患者和移植物的存活率以及CHF出院后30天的再入院率在使用belatacept和继续使用CNI之间没有显著差异。排斥反应的发生率较高的belatacept转换组,提示需要更密切的随访患者的belatacept治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplantation proceedings
Transplantation proceedings 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
502
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Transplantation Proceedings publishes several different categories of manuscripts, all of which undergo extensive peer review by recognized authorities in the field prior to their acceptance for publication. The first type of manuscripts consists of sets of papers providing an in-depth expression of the current state of the art in various rapidly developing components of world transplantation biology and medicine. These manuscripts emanate from congresses of the affiliated transplantation societies, from Symposia sponsored by the Societies, as well as special Conferences and Workshops covering related topics. Transplantation Proceedings also publishes several special sections including publication of Clinical Transplantation Proceedings, being rapid original contributions of preclinical and clinical experiences. These manuscripts undergo review by members of the Editorial Board. Original basic or clinical science articles, clinical trials and case studies can be submitted to the journal?s open access companion title Transplantation Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信