Exploring the Views of British Columbians Regarding the Environmental Impact of Medication Use.

The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy Pub Date : 2025-05-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4212/cjhp.3707
Madison Lai, Karen Dahri, Gigi Wong, Michael Legal
{"title":"Exploring the Views of British Columbians Regarding the Environmental Impact of Medication Use.","authors":"Madison Lai, Karen Dahri, Gigi Wong, Michael Legal","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.3707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pharmaceuticals affect planetary health through environmental contamination from human excretions, improper drug disposal, and greenhouse gas emissions, derived from manufacturing as well as from use. Research suggests that patients will choose environmentally friendly options for minor ailments, but not severe conditions. To date, no Canadian research has explored patients' views on this topic.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To characterize the views of British Columbians regarding medication-related environmental sustainability and to determine how these views relate to medication decisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A web-based survey was distributed across British Columbia from October 30, 2023, to February 29, 2024. Residents of British Columbia at least 18 years of age who could complete an online survey in English were eligible to participate. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 255 responses were received. When presented with a scenario related to stroke, more than half of respondents (51%) preferred the medication with higher efficacy and greater environmental harm; in contrast, for scenarios involving the common cold and asthma, more than half chose the medication with lower efficacy and lower environmental harm (54% and 59%, respectively). When cost was introduced, only 54% stated they would choose the more environmentally friendly medication if it was more expensive, whereas 97% would do so if it was less expensive. Themes from open-ended questions focused on cost, manufacturer considerations, and education.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Respondents were willing to choose the environmentally friendly medication for less serious conditions, but not for conditions perceived as life-threatening and/or debilitating. Cost may be a barrier to accessing environmentally friendly options. Public education opportunities may help to inform more sustainable choices. Additionally, there may be value in manufacturer regulations or policies to ensure that the environmental impact of medications is considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":94225,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","volume":"78 2","pages":"e3707"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12057818/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.3707","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pharmaceuticals affect planetary health through environmental contamination from human excretions, improper drug disposal, and greenhouse gas emissions, derived from manufacturing as well as from use. Research suggests that patients will choose environmentally friendly options for minor ailments, but not severe conditions. To date, no Canadian research has explored patients' views on this topic.

Objectives: To characterize the views of British Columbians regarding medication-related environmental sustainability and to determine how these views relate to medication decisions.

Methods: A web-based survey was distributed across British Columbia from October 30, 2023, to February 29, 2024. Residents of British Columbia at least 18 years of age who could complete an online survey in English were eligible to participate. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were used.

Results: A total of 255 responses were received. When presented with a scenario related to stroke, more than half of respondents (51%) preferred the medication with higher efficacy and greater environmental harm; in contrast, for scenarios involving the common cold and asthma, more than half chose the medication with lower efficacy and lower environmental harm (54% and 59%, respectively). When cost was introduced, only 54% stated they would choose the more environmentally friendly medication if it was more expensive, whereas 97% would do so if it was less expensive. Themes from open-ended questions focused on cost, manufacturer considerations, and education.

Conclusions: Respondents were willing to choose the environmentally friendly medication for less serious conditions, but not for conditions perceived as life-threatening and/or debilitating. Cost may be a barrier to accessing environmentally friendly options. Public education opportunities may help to inform more sustainable choices. Additionally, there may be value in manufacturer regulations or policies to ensure that the environmental impact of medications is considered.

探讨不列颠哥伦比亚人对药物使用对环境影响的看法。
背景:药品通过人类排泄物、不当的药物处置和制造和使用过程中产生的温室气体排放对环境造成污染,从而影响地球健康。研究表明,小病患者会选择对环境友好的治疗方案,但病情严重的患者则不会。到目前为止,还没有加拿大的研究探讨过患者对这个话题的看法。目的:描述不列颠哥伦比亚省关于药物相关环境可持续性的观点,并确定这些观点如何与药物决策相关。方法:于2023年10月30日至2024年2月29日在不列颠哥伦比亚省进行网络调查。不列颠哥伦比亚省年满18岁的居民可以用英语完成在线调查,有资格参加。采用描述性统计和专题分析。结果:共收到255份回复。当出现与中风相关的情况时,超过一半的受访者(51%)更倾向于疗效更高但对环境危害更大的药物;相比之下,在涉及普通感冒和哮喘的情况下,超过一半的人选择了疗效较低、对环境危害较小的药物(分别为54%和59%)。当引入成本时,只有54%的人表示,如果价格更贵,他们会选择更环保的药物,而如果价格更便宜,他们会选择更环保的药物,而97%的人会这样做。开放式问题的主题集中在成本、制造商考虑和教育方面。结论:受访者愿意在不太严重的情况下选择环保药物,但不愿意在危及生命和/或使人衰弱的情况下选择环保药物。成本可能是获得环境友好选择的障碍。公共教育机会可能有助于为更可持续的选择提供信息。此外,制造商的法规或政策可能有价值,以确保药物对环境的影响被考虑在内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信