The experimental promise and clinical reality of myocardial conditioning for prevention of myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury: an umbrella review of systematic reviews.

L Maximilian Buja, Sonya E Fogg
{"title":"The experimental promise and clinical reality of myocardial conditioning for prevention of myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury: an umbrella review of systematic reviews.","authors":"L Maximilian Buja, Sonya E Fogg","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4806.25.09660-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Experimental research sequentially identified reperfusion (in 1972) and conditioning (in 1986) as the two most powerful interventions for reducing acute myocardial infarct (AMI) size following acute coronary occlusion. These discoveries led to further experimental studies on optimal myocardial salvage and intensive clinical efforts to translate these interventions into the management of patients. This umbrella review of systematic reviews addresses the state of research on the effectiveness of pharmacological and interventional conditioning protocols to modulate the impact of ischemia and reperfusion in experimental animals and patients and the comparability of results in experimental animals and humans. This umbrella review documents the paradox of the experimental success of conditioning strategies in the experimental arena and equivocal clinical results of the application of the same conditioning strategies in patients.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>The review was conducted using the reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions codified in the PRIOR statement (https://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/reporting-guideline-for-overviews-of-reviews-of-healthcare-interventions-development-of-the-prior-statement/).</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>The results are summarized in the PRISMA format. A discussion is provided of known and unknown factors responsible for the lack of progress in identifying and implementing interventions to further reduce morbidity and mortality from ischemic heart disease, as well as a practical strategy to achieve timely reperfusion in a larger number of patients experiencing acute coronary syndrome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While awaiting further research to develop a third window of cardioprotection, the most practical approach today is to reduce the morbidity and mortality from IHD is to mount a public education campaign to get the 50% of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with prodromal AMI to the hospital to institute timely reperfusion therapy which has a proven to be the most effective therapy to limit the extend of myocardial damage in patients with IHD. However, the possibility has been raised that the human myocardium may have a genetically determined, primordial non-responsiveness to cardioprotective interventions that exists beyond the established recognized confounding factors. Primordial genetic factors may be particularly difficult to overcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":94143,"journal":{"name":"Minerva medica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4806.25.09660-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Experimental research sequentially identified reperfusion (in 1972) and conditioning (in 1986) as the two most powerful interventions for reducing acute myocardial infarct (AMI) size following acute coronary occlusion. These discoveries led to further experimental studies on optimal myocardial salvage and intensive clinical efforts to translate these interventions into the management of patients. This umbrella review of systematic reviews addresses the state of research on the effectiveness of pharmacological and interventional conditioning protocols to modulate the impact of ischemia and reperfusion in experimental animals and patients and the comparability of results in experimental animals and humans. This umbrella review documents the paradox of the experimental success of conditioning strategies in the experimental arena and equivocal clinical results of the application of the same conditioning strategies in patients.

Evidence acquisition: The review was conducted using the reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions codified in the PRIOR statement (https://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/reporting-guideline-for-overviews-of-reviews-of-healthcare-interventions-development-of-the-prior-statement/).

Evidence synthesis: The results are summarized in the PRISMA format. A discussion is provided of known and unknown factors responsible for the lack of progress in identifying and implementing interventions to further reduce morbidity and mortality from ischemic heart disease, as well as a practical strategy to achieve timely reperfusion in a larger number of patients experiencing acute coronary syndrome.

Conclusions: While awaiting further research to develop a third window of cardioprotection, the most practical approach today is to reduce the morbidity and mortality from IHD is to mount a public education campaign to get the 50% of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with prodromal AMI to the hospital to institute timely reperfusion therapy which has a proven to be the most effective therapy to limit the extend of myocardial damage in patients with IHD. However, the possibility has been raised that the human myocardium may have a genetically determined, primordial non-responsiveness to cardioprotective interventions that exists beyond the established recognized confounding factors. Primordial genetic factors may be particularly difficult to overcome.

心肌调节预防心肌缺血再灌注损伤的实验前景和临床现实:系统综述。
实验研究相继确定再灌注(1972年)和调节(1986年)是减少急性冠状动脉闭塞后急性心肌梗死(AMI)大小的两种最有效的干预措施。这些发现导致了进一步的最佳心肌挽救的实验研究和密集的临床努力,将这些干预措施转化为患者的管理。这篇系统综述概述了药理学和介入性调节方案调节实验动物和患者缺血和再灌注影响的有效性的研究现状,以及实验动物和人类结果的可比性。本综述记录了条件反射策略在实验领域的实验成功和在患者中应用相同条件反射策略的模棱两可的临床结果的悖论。证据获取:审查是根据PRIOR声明(https://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/reporting-guideline-for-overviews-of-reviews-of-healthcare-interventions-development-of-the-prior-statement/).Evidence)中编纂的卫生保健干预审查概述报告指南进行的:结果以PRISMA格式总结。本文讨论了在确定和实施进一步降低缺血性心脏病发病率和死亡率的干预措施方面缺乏进展的已知和未知因素,以及在大量急性冠状动脉综合征患者中实现及时再灌注的实用策略。结论:在等待进一步研究开发第三个心脏保护窗口的同时,目前降低IHD发病率和死亡率最实用的方法是开展公众教育运动,让50%的急性冠脉综合征(ACS) AMI前驱患者到医院进行及时的再灌注治疗,这已被证明是限制IHD患者心肌损伤扩展的最有效的治疗方法。然而,人们提出了一种可能性,即人类心肌可能具有遗传决定的、对心脏保护干预的原始无反应性,这种无反应性存在于公认的混杂因素之外。原始的遗传因素可能特别难以克服。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信