From pandemic onset to present: five years of insights into ARDS caused by COVID-19.

IF 2.7
Expert review of respiratory medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-19 DOI:10.1080/17476348.2025.2507207
Esteban Ortiz-Prado, Juan S Izquierdo-Condoy, Jorge Vasconez-Gonzalez, Andrés López-Cortés, Camila Salazar-Santoliva, Alfonso Roberto Vargas Michay, Jorge Luis Vélez-Paéz, Luis Unigarro
{"title":"From pandemic onset to present: five years of insights into ARDS caused by COVID-19.","authors":"Esteban Ortiz-Prado, Juan S Izquierdo-Condoy, Jorge Vasconez-Gonzalez, Andrés López-Cortés, Camila Salazar-Santoliva, Alfonso Roberto Vargas Michay, Jorge Luis Vélez-Paéz, Luis Unigarro","doi":"10.1080/17476348.2025.2507207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has challenged healthcare systems, initially resembling classical ARDS but later recognized as distinct. Unique features such as endothelial injury, microthrombosis, and dysregulated inflammation influenced treatment efficacy. Understanding its evolution is key to optimizing therapy and improving outcomes.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review synthesizes current evidence on COVID-19-associated ARDS, covering epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical phenotypes, and treatments. It explores the shift from L and H phenotypes to a refined disease model and highlights key therapies, including corticosteroids, immunomodulators, prone positioning, ECMO, and vaccination's impact on severity and ARDS incidence.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in December 2019, uncertainty was overwhelming. Early clinical guidelines relied on case reports and small case series, offering only preliminary insights into disease progression and management. Despite the initial chaos, the scientific community launched an unprecedented research effort, with over 11,000 clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov investigating COVID-19 treatments. Several evidence-based strategies emerged as gold standards for managing COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome, surpassing prior approaches. The pandemic exposed vulnerabilities in global healthcare, reshaped modern medicine, accelerated innovation, and reinforced the essential role of evidence-based practice in critical care and public health policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94007,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of respiratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"843-862"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17476348.2025.2507207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has challenged healthcare systems, initially resembling classical ARDS but later recognized as distinct. Unique features such as endothelial injury, microthrombosis, and dysregulated inflammation influenced treatment efficacy. Understanding its evolution is key to optimizing therapy and improving outcomes.

Areas covered: This review synthesizes current evidence on COVID-19-associated ARDS, covering epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical phenotypes, and treatments. It explores the shift from L and H phenotypes to a refined disease model and highlights key therapies, including corticosteroids, immunomodulators, prone positioning, ECMO, and vaccination's impact on severity and ARDS incidence.

Expert opinion: At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in December 2019, uncertainty was overwhelming. Early clinical guidelines relied on case reports and small case series, offering only preliminary insights into disease progression and management. Despite the initial chaos, the scientific community launched an unprecedented research effort, with over 11,000 clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov investigating COVID-19 treatments. Several evidence-based strategies emerged as gold standards for managing COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome, surpassing prior approaches. The pandemic exposed vulnerabilities in global healthcare, reshaped modern medicine, accelerated innovation, and reinforced the essential role of evidence-based practice in critical care and public health policy.

从大流行开始到现在:对COVID-19引起的ARDS的五年见解。
导语:与covid -19相关的急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)对卫生保健系统构成了挑战,最初类似于典型的ARDS,但后来被认为是不同的。独特的特点,如内皮损伤,微血栓形成和炎症失调影响治疗效果。了解其演变是优化治疗和改善结果的关键。涵盖领域:本综述综合了covid -19相关ARDS的现有证据,涵盖流行病学、病理生理学、临床表型和治疗。它探讨了从L和H表型到精细疾病模型的转变,并强调了关键的治疗方法,包括皮质类固醇、免疫调节剂、俯卧位、ECMO和疫苗接种对严重程度和ARDS发病率的影响。专家意见:2019年12月COVID-19大流行开始时,不确定性压倒一切。早期的临床指南依赖于病例报告和小病例系列,仅提供对疾病进展和管理的初步见解。尽管最初出现了混乱,科学界还是开展了前所未有的研究工作,在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册了1.1万多项临床试验,研究COVID-19的治疗方法。一些以证据为基础的战略成为管理covid -19相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征的金标准,超越了以前的方法。大流行暴露了全球卫生保健的脆弱性,重塑了现代医学,加速了创新,并加强了循证实践在重症监护和公共卫生政策中的重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信