Lupus Anticoagulant Testing in Challenging Situations: Navigating Complexities.

Katrien M J Devreese
{"title":"Lupus Anticoagulant Testing in Challenging Situations: Navigating Complexities.","authors":"Katrien M J Devreese","doi":"10.1111/ijlh.14490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The laboratory diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) relies on detecting persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), including lupus anticoagulant (LA) as one of the three laboratory criteria. LA is a well-established risk factor in APS and the cornerstone of APS diagnosis, identifying triple-positive patients. LA testing is supported by testing guidelines, but challenges remain with LA measurement, which is complex and susceptible to numerous pitfalls and interferences. A nuanced understanding of the technical and interpretative aspects of LA testing is crucial for accurate diagnosis. Limited to specific patient populations, the timing of testing in relation to clinical events is essential to avoid false results, and only persistent LA positivity is considered diagnostic. Proper sample preparation, choice of assays, test procedure, cutoff values, and strategies to handle anticoagulant therapy interference pose significant challenges in LA testing. While advances in the harmonization of test procedures and testing guidelines have improved diagnostic reliability, the complex nature of LA demands careful consideration of methodological issues and potential interferences, underscoring the importance of expertise and interdisciplinary communication in achieving accurate results. Interpretative comments and close interaction between clinical pathologists and clinicians are mandatory for diagnosis and patient management. This paper will focus on the technical aspects of the laboratory method and the interpretation of LA results in the diagnosis of APS with attention to specific situations where LA testing is difficult.</p>","PeriodicalId":94050,"journal":{"name":"International journal of laboratory hematology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of laboratory hematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.14490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The laboratory diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) relies on detecting persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), including lupus anticoagulant (LA) as one of the three laboratory criteria. LA is a well-established risk factor in APS and the cornerstone of APS diagnosis, identifying triple-positive patients. LA testing is supported by testing guidelines, but challenges remain with LA measurement, which is complex and susceptible to numerous pitfalls and interferences. A nuanced understanding of the technical and interpretative aspects of LA testing is crucial for accurate diagnosis. Limited to specific patient populations, the timing of testing in relation to clinical events is essential to avoid false results, and only persistent LA positivity is considered diagnostic. Proper sample preparation, choice of assays, test procedure, cutoff values, and strategies to handle anticoagulant therapy interference pose significant challenges in LA testing. While advances in the harmonization of test procedures and testing guidelines have improved diagnostic reliability, the complex nature of LA demands careful consideration of methodological issues and potential interferences, underscoring the importance of expertise and interdisciplinary communication in achieving accurate results. Interpretative comments and close interaction between clinical pathologists and clinicians are mandatory for diagnosis and patient management. This paper will focus on the technical aspects of the laboratory method and the interpretation of LA results in the diagnosis of APS with attention to specific situations where LA testing is difficult.

狼疮抗凝血试验在挑战性的情况下:导航复杂性。
抗磷脂综合征(APS)的实验室诊断依赖于检测持续性抗磷脂抗体(aPL),其中狼疮抗凝剂(LA)是三个实验室标准之一。LA是APS中一个公认的危险因素,也是APS诊断的基石,可以识别三阳性患者。测试指南支持LA测试,但是LA测量仍然存在挑战,它很复杂,容易受到许多陷阱和干扰的影响。对LA检测的技术和解释方面的细致理解对于准确诊断至关重要。仅限于特定的患者群体,与临床事件相关的检测时间对于避免错误结果至关重要,并且只有持续的LA阳性才被认为是诊断。适当的样品制备、测定方法的选择、测试程序、截止值和处理抗凝治疗干扰的策略对LA检测构成了重大挑战。虽然在测试程序和测试指南的统一方面取得了进步,提高了诊断的可靠性,但LA的复杂性要求仔细考虑方法问题和潜在的干扰,强调了专业知识和跨学科沟通在实现准确结果方面的重要性。临床病理学家和临床医生之间的解释性意见和密切互动是诊断和患者管理的必要条件。本文将重点介绍实验室方法的技术方面以及APS诊断中LA结果的解释,并关注LA测试困难的具体情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信