Unlocking the diagnostic potential of parathormone washout: a path to accurate parathyroid tumor localization.

Ekin Yiğit Köroğlu, Berna Evranos Öğmen, Belma Tural Balsak, Mustafa Ömer Yazicioğlu, Cevdet Aydin, Oya Topaloğlu, Reyhan Ersoy, Bekir Çakir
{"title":"Unlocking the diagnostic potential of parathormone washout: a path to accurate parathyroid tumor localization.","authors":"Ekin Yiğit Köroğlu, Berna Evranos Öğmen, Belma Tural Balsak, Mustafa Ömer Yazicioğlu, Cevdet Aydin, Oya Topaloğlu, Reyhan Ersoy, Bekir Çakir","doi":"10.1080/00325481.2025.2506983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Accurate tumor localization is necessary for the application of minimally invasive surgery, which is preferred in the treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism. Parathormone-washout (PTH-WO) is parathyroid fine-needle aspiration followed by PTH measurement in the needle washout fluid. This study aimed to determine appropriate cutoff values for the PTH-WO method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 402 PTH-WO assays from 339 patients were included in the study. The diagnostic accuracy of the test was assessed by accepting as a positive result a PTH-WO result higher than the serum PTH level [PTH-WO/serum PTH(PTH ratio)>1]. In addition, a cutoff value for the test was established by evaluating the PTH washout results obtained in comparison with postoperative histopathology. Undiluted test results were not included to obtain a clear numerical value in this evaluation. The results of parathyroid scintigraphy and fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) were compared with postoperative histopathology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While 309 (76.86%) of the PTH-WO procedures were considered positive, 93 (23.13%) were considered negative if the PTH ratio was > 1. When these results were compared with the postoperative histopathology, the test's sensitivity was 92.51%, and the specificity was 100.00%. In the analysis of the remaining 292 PTH-WO samples after excluding the undiluted ones, the sensitivity and specificity of the method were 92.3% and 94.1%, respectively, with a PTH ratio > 0.99. With a cutoff value of 99.5 ng/l for PTH-WO value, 93.1% sensitivity and 94.3% specificity were obtained. The sensitivities of parathyroid scintigraphy and FNAB were 53.4% and 15.3%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PTH-WO method is safe and cheap, with high sensitivity and specificity in localizing parathyroid tumor. In cases where radiological methods cannot achieve localization with specified cutoff values, it has high diagnostic accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94176,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2025.2506983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Accurate tumor localization is necessary for the application of minimally invasive surgery, which is preferred in the treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism. Parathormone-washout (PTH-WO) is parathyroid fine-needle aspiration followed by PTH measurement in the needle washout fluid. This study aimed to determine appropriate cutoff values for the PTH-WO method.

Methods: A total of 402 PTH-WO assays from 339 patients were included in the study. The diagnostic accuracy of the test was assessed by accepting as a positive result a PTH-WO result higher than the serum PTH level [PTH-WO/serum PTH(PTH ratio)>1]. In addition, a cutoff value for the test was established by evaluating the PTH washout results obtained in comparison with postoperative histopathology. Undiluted test results were not included to obtain a clear numerical value in this evaluation. The results of parathyroid scintigraphy and fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) were compared with postoperative histopathology.

Results: While 309 (76.86%) of the PTH-WO procedures were considered positive, 93 (23.13%) were considered negative if the PTH ratio was > 1. When these results were compared with the postoperative histopathology, the test's sensitivity was 92.51%, and the specificity was 100.00%. In the analysis of the remaining 292 PTH-WO samples after excluding the undiluted ones, the sensitivity and specificity of the method were 92.3% and 94.1%, respectively, with a PTH ratio > 0.99. With a cutoff value of 99.5 ng/l for PTH-WO value, 93.1% sensitivity and 94.3% specificity were obtained. The sensitivities of parathyroid scintigraphy and FNAB were 53.4% and 15.3%, respectively.

Conclusions: The PTH-WO method is safe and cheap, with high sensitivity and specificity in localizing parathyroid tumor. In cases where radiological methods cannot achieve localization with specified cutoff values, it has high diagnostic accuracy.

解锁甲状旁腺激素冲洗的诊断潜力:准确定位甲状旁腺肿瘤的途径。
目的:准确的肿瘤定位是微创手术应用的必要条件,是治疗原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进的首选方法。甲状旁腺激素冲洗(PTH- wo)是甲状旁腺细针抽吸,然后在针冲洗液中测量甲状旁腺激素。本研究旨在为PTH-WO方法确定合适的截止值。方法:对339例患者进行402项PTH-WO测定。将PTH- wo结果高于血清PTH水平(PTH - wo /血清PTH(PTH比值)>1)视为阳性结果来评估该试验的诊断准确性。此外,通过评估PTH冲洗结果与术后组织病理学比较,建立了该试验的截止值。未稀释的试验结果不包括在内,以便在本评价中获得明确的数值。将甲状旁腺显像和细针穿刺活检(FNAB)结果与术后组织病理学进行比较。结果:PTH- wo检查阳性309例(76.86%),阴性93例(23.13%)。将这些结果与术后组织病理学进行比较,该试验的敏感性为92.51%,特异性为100.00%。在剔除未稀释标本后剩余292份PTH- wo标本的分析中,该方法的灵敏度和特异性分别为92.3%和94.1%,PTH比值为bb0 0.99。PTH-WO值的截止值为99.5 ng/l,灵敏度为93.1%,特异性为94.3%。甲状旁腺闪烁成像和FNAB的敏感性分别为53.4%和15.3%。结论:PTH-WO法对甲状旁腺肿瘤的定位具有较高的敏感性和特异性,安全、廉价。在某些情况下,放射学方法不能达到特定的截止值定位,它具有很高的诊断准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信