[Mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock associated with the use of microaxial flow pump: a systematic review and meta-analysis].

Paul E Hernández-Montes, Edgar D Guzmán-Ríos, Marco F Flores-Reyes, Erick Ramírez-García, Lenyn D Montes-Sevilla, Osmara Morales-Hernández, Gilberto H Acosta-Gutiérrez
{"title":"[Mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock associated with the use of microaxial flow pump: a systematic review and meta-analysis].","authors":"Paul E Hernández-Montes, Edgar D Guzmán-Ríos, Marco F Flores-Reyes, Erick Ramírez-García, Lenyn D Montes-Sevilla, Osmara Morales-Hernández, Gilberto H Acosta-Gutiérrez","doi":"10.24875/ACM.24000260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this article we aim to evaluate the impact of the microaxial flow pump on mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock associated with acute myocardial infarction through a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials and cohort studies. Patients with acute myocardial infarction, both with and without ST-segment elevation, associated with cardiogenic shock and treated with a microaxial flow pump, were included. Mortality data and implantation time of the device were reported. Patients with more than 24 hours of shock progression, those with other shock etiologies, patients with mechanical complications from acute myocardial infarction, and other comorbidity, were excluded. The search was conducted in PubMed and Web of Science databases for articles published from 2019 until November 10, 2024. Risk of bias was evaluated using the RoB 2 tool and the ROBINS-E, while statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4.1 software. A total of 1000 patients from five studies were included. The use of the microaxial flow pump was associated with a reduction in mortality compared to placebo (OR: 0.6; 95%CI: 0.42-0.85; p = 0.005). However, there were no significant differences in mortality related to the timing of the microaxial flow pump implantation (before, during, or after percutaneous coronary intervention) (OR: 0.85; 95%CI: 0.59-1.22; p = 0.37). Patients with cardiogenic shock have gained access to various treatment opportunities that were not available until recently. The results suggest that the microaxial flow pump is a therapeutic option in these patients with significant effects on mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":93885,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/ACM.24000260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article we aim to evaluate the impact of the microaxial flow pump on mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock associated with acute myocardial infarction through a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials and cohort studies. Patients with acute myocardial infarction, both with and without ST-segment elevation, associated with cardiogenic shock and treated with a microaxial flow pump, were included. Mortality data and implantation time of the device were reported. Patients with more than 24 hours of shock progression, those with other shock etiologies, patients with mechanical complications from acute myocardial infarction, and other comorbidity, were excluded. The search was conducted in PubMed and Web of Science databases for articles published from 2019 until November 10, 2024. Risk of bias was evaluated using the RoB 2 tool and the ROBINS-E, while statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4.1 software. A total of 1000 patients from five studies were included. The use of the microaxial flow pump was associated with a reduction in mortality compared to placebo (OR: 0.6; 95%CI: 0.42-0.85; p = 0.005). However, there were no significant differences in mortality related to the timing of the microaxial flow pump implantation (before, during, or after percutaneous coronary intervention) (OR: 0.85; 95%CI: 0.59-1.22; p = 0.37). Patients with cardiogenic shock have gained access to various treatment opportunities that were not available until recently. The results suggest that the microaxial flow pump is a therapeutic option in these patients with significant effects on mortality.

[与使用微轴流泵相关的心源性休克患者死亡率:一项系统综述和荟萃分析]。
在本文中,我们旨在通过临床试验和队列研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析来评估微轴流泵对急性心肌梗死相关心源性休克患者死亡率的影响。包括急性心肌梗死患者,不论有无st段抬高,伴有心源性休克并接受微轴流泵治疗。报告了死亡率数据和植入时间。排除休克进展超过24小时的患者、其他休克病因的患者、急性心肌梗死的机械并发症患者和其他合并症患者。该搜索是在PubMed和Web of Science数据库中对2019年至2024年11月10日发表的文章进行的。使用rob2工具和ROBINS-E评估偏倚风险,使用Review Manager 5.4.1软件进行统计分析。共纳入了来自5项研究的1000名患者。与安慰剂相比,使用微轴流泵与死亡率降低相关(OR: 0.6;95%置信区间:0.42—-0.85;P = 0.005)。然而,与微轴流泵植入时间(在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗之前、期间或之后)相关的死亡率没有显著差异(or: 0.85;95%置信区间:0.59—-1.22;P = 0.37)。心源性休克患者已经获得了各种治疗机会,直到最近才获得。结果表明,微轴流泵是这些患者的治疗选择,对死亡率有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信