Use of any form of Amphotericin B Alone or with Posaconazole in COVID-19 Associated Mucormycosis (CAM) at the Time of Pandemic Disaster in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital.

Pugazhenthan Thangaraju, Ripudaman Arora, Nitin M Nagarkar, Pankaj Kumar Kannauje, Rupa Mehta, Hemasri Velmurugan, Muthathal Subramanian
{"title":"Use of any form of Amphotericin B Alone or with Posaconazole in COVID-19 Associated Mucormycosis (CAM) at the Time of Pandemic Disaster in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital.","authors":"Pugazhenthan Thangaraju, Ripudaman Arora, Nitin M Nagarkar, Pankaj Kumar Kannauje, Rupa Mehta, Hemasri Velmurugan, Muthathal Subramanian","doi":"10.2174/0127724344355666250513101536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The recent COVID-19 wave showed a significant rise in mucormycosis, changing its prevalence, particularly in India. Sadly, the total risk of mortality due to COVID-19 associated mucormycosis (CAM) remains high. It may be better to introduce a combination of drugs rather than unacceptable poor outcomes with Amphotericin B monotherapy.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study is to assess the proportion of mucormycosis patient's clinical outcomes with antifungal agent (Amphotericin B of any forms alone) or combination drug therapy (Amphotericin B of any form and Posaconazole).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>It was a retrospective cohort study conducted between April 1st, 2021 and July 31st, 2021 at the tertiary care teaching hospital All India Institutes of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Raipur.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 271 medical records of CAM patients, 211 records were included in the study. Among them, 46 patients (21.8%) received group 1 treatment i.e. Amphotericin only and 165 patients (78.2%) received group 2 treatment, i.e. Amphotericin B with Posaconazole. Group 2 was associated with a longer time to event, having a higher survival rate. The Hazard Ratio (HR) was 0.22 (95% CI - 0.13-0.36, p-value 0.000).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings will support the need for future studies to determine the efficacy of AMB and posaconazole combination therapy in the treatment of mucormycosis and to produce an evidence-based standard treatment regimen.</p>","PeriodicalId":74643,"journal":{"name":"Recent advances in anti-infective drug discovery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recent advances in anti-infective drug discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0127724344355666250513101536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The recent COVID-19 wave showed a significant rise in mucormycosis, changing its prevalence, particularly in India. Sadly, the total risk of mortality due to COVID-19 associated mucormycosis (CAM) remains high. It may be better to introduce a combination of drugs rather than unacceptable poor outcomes with Amphotericin B monotherapy.

Aim: The aim of this study is to assess the proportion of mucormycosis patient's clinical outcomes with antifungal agent (Amphotericin B of any forms alone) or combination drug therapy (Amphotericin B of any form and Posaconazole).

Methods: It was a retrospective cohort study conducted between April 1st, 2021 and July 31st, 2021 at the tertiary care teaching hospital All India Institutes of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Raipur.

Results: Out of 271 medical records of CAM patients, 211 records were included in the study. Among them, 46 patients (21.8%) received group 1 treatment i.e. Amphotericin only and 165 patients (78.2%) received group 2 treatment, i.e. Amphotericin B with Posaconazole. Group 2 was associated with a longer time to event, having a higher survival rate. The Hazard Ratio (HR) was 0.22 (95% CI - 0.13-0.36, p-value 0.000).

Conclusion: Our findings will support the need for future studies to determine the efficacy of AMB and posaconazole combination therapy in the treatment of mucormycosis and to produce an evidence-based standard treatment regimen.

三级保健教学医院在大流行灾难时单独使用任何形式的两性霉素B或与泊沙康唑联合使用COVID-19相关毛霉菌病(CAM)
背景:最近的COVID-19浪潮显示毛霉病显著上升,改变了其流行情况,特别是在印度。遗憾的是,与COVID-19相关的毛霉病(CAM)造成的总死亡风险仍然很高。引入联合用药可能比单药两性霉素B治疗产生不可接受的不良后果要好。目的:本研究的目的是评估毛霉病患者使用抗真菌药物(任何形式的两性霉素B)或联合药物治疗(任何形式的两性霉素B和泊沙康唑)的临床结果比例。方法:回顾性队列研究于2021年4月1日至2021年7月31日在Raipur全印度医学科学研究所(AIIMS)三级保健教学医院进行。结果:271例CAM患者病历中,211例纳入研究。其中,46例(21.8%)患者接受单用两性霉素治疗,165例(78.2%)患者接受双用两性霉素B联合泊沙康唑治疗。第二组发生事件的时间较长,生存率较高。风险比(HR)为0.22 (95% CI - 0.13-0.36, p值0.000)。结论:我们的研究结果将支持未来的研究,以确定AMB和泊沙康唑联合治疗毛霉病的疗效,并产生一个基于证据的标准治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信