Maximilian Feussner, Angela Migur, Alexander Mitrofanov, Omer S Alkhnbashi, Rolf Backofen, Chase L Beisel, Zasha Weinberg
{"title":"Disparate mechanisms counteract extraneous CRISPR RNA production in type II-C CRISPR-Cas systems.","authors":"Maximilian Feussner, Angela Migur, Alexander Mitrofanov, Omer S Alkhnbashi, Rolf Backofen, Chase L Beisel, Zasha Weinberg","doi":"10.1093/femsml/uqaf007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>CRISPR-Cas adaptive immune systems in bacteria and archaea enable precise targeting and elimination of invading genetic elements. An inherent feature of these systems is the 'extraneous' CRISPR RNA (ecrRNA), which is produced via the extra repeat in a CRISPR array lacking a corresponding spacer. As ecrRNAs would interact with the Cas machinery yet not direct acquired immunity, they pose a potential barrier to defence. Type II-A CRISPR-Cas systems resolve this barrier through the leader sequence upstream of a CRISPR array, which forms a hairpin structure with the extra repeat that inhibits ecrRNA production. However, the fate of ecrRNAs in other CRISPR types and subtypes remains to be explored. Here, we report that II-C systems likely employ disparate strategies to resolve the ecrRNA due to their distinct configuration in comparison to II-A. Applying bioinformatics analyses to over 650 II-C systems followed by experimental validation, we identified three strategies applicable to these systems: formation of an upstream Rho-independent terminator, formation of a hairpin that sequesters the ecrRNA guide, and mutations in the repeat expected to disrupt ecrRNA formation. These findings expand the list of mechanisms in CRISPR-Cas systems that could resolve the ecrRNA to optimize immune response.</p>","PeriodicalId":74189,"journal":{"name":"microLife","volume":"6 ","pages":"uqaf007"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12080349/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"microLife","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/femsml/uqaf007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
CRISPR-Cas adaptive immune systems in bacteria and archaea enable precise targeting and elimination of invading genetic elements. An inherent feature of these systems is the 'extraneous' CRISPR RNA (ecrRNA), which is produced via the extra repeat in a CRISPR array lacking a corresponding spacer. As ecrRNAs would interact with the Cas machinery yet not direct acquired immunity, they pose a potential barrier to defence. Type II-A CRISPR-Cas systems resolve this barrier through the leader sequence upstream of a CRISPR array, which forms a hairpin structure with the extra repeat that inhibits ecrRNA production. However, the fate of ecrRNAs in other CRISPR types and subtypes remains to be explored. Here, we report that II-C systems likely employ disparate strategies to resolve the ecrRNA due to their distinct configuration in comparison to II-A. Applying bioinformatics analyses to over 650 II-C systems followed by experimental validation, we identified three strategies applicable to these systems: formation of an upstream Rho-independent terminator, formation of a hairpin that sequesters the ecrRNA guide, and mutations in the repeat expected to disrupt ecrRNA formation. These findings expand the list of mechanisms in CRISPR-Cas systems that could resolve the ecrRNA to optimize immune response.