Bernardo F Pompeu, Victória Mara Vieira Rocha, Ana Flávia Machado Oliveira, Patricia Marcolin, Luís C Dos Lucio Generoso, Sérgio Mazzola Poli De Figueiredo, Fernanda B Formiga
{"title":"Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction for Right-Sided Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Propensity Score-Matched Studies.","authors":"Bernardo F Pompeu, Victória Mara Vieira Rocha, Ana Flávia Machado Oliveira, Patricia Marcolin, Luís C Dos Lucio Generoso, Sérgio Mazzola Poli De Figueiredo, Fernanda B Formiga","doi":"10.7759/cureus.84191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Minimally invasive surgery is the standard approach for right-sided colon cancer, but conventional laparoscopic specimen extraction (CVT) requires additional abdominal incisions, increasing the risk of postoperative complications and delayed recovery. Natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) minimizes abdominal incisions, potentially improving patient outcomes. This meta-analysis compares NOSE and CVT in terms of postoperative complications, operative characteristics, and long-term outcomes. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials, and Web of Science for studies available up to December 2024. A random-effects model was applied to compute ORs and mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I² statistic. All statistical analyses were performed using R software (version 4.4.1, R Foundation for Statistical Computing). Seven propensity score-matched studies with 566 patients were included, with 240 (42.4%) undergoing NOSE and 326 (57.6%) undergoing CVT. NOSE was associated with significantly reduced postoperative pain on the 3rd day (MD -1.1; 95% CI -1.7 to -0.5; p < 0.01), lower SSI rates (OR 0.23; 95% CI 0.08-0.73; p = 0.012), and a shorter time to pass flatus (MD -0.8; 95% CI -1.2 to -0.4; p < 0.01). However, NOSE was linked to longer operative times (MD 36.4 minutes; 95% CI 3.4-69.4; p = 0.03). No significant differences were found in hospital stay (MD -0.5 days; 95% CI -2.1 to 1.1; p = 0.57), blood loss (MD -2.1; 95% CI -9.6 to 5.4; p = 0.58), or local recurrence (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.07-3.01; p = 0.405). In conclusion, NOSE offers advantages such as reduced postoperative pain, lower SSI rates, and faster bowel recovery, with prolonged operative time as its main limitation. These findings support NOSE as a viable alternative to CVT for right-sided colon cancer without compromising safety or long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":"17 5","pages":"e84191"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081068/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.84191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Minimally invasive surgery is the standard approach for right-sided colon cancer, but conventional laparoscopic specimen extraction (CVT) requires additional abdominal incisions, increasing the risk of postoperative complications and delayed recovery. Natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) minimizes abdominal incisions, potentially improving patient outcomes. This meta-analysis compares NOSE and CVT in terms of postoperative complications, operative characteristics, and long-term outcomes. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials, and Web of Science for studies available up to December 2024. A random-effects model was applied to compute ORs and mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I² statistic. All statistical analyses were performed using R software (version 4.4.1, R Foundation for Statistical Computing). Seven propensity score-matched studies with 566 patients were included, with 240 (42.4%) undergoing NOSE and 326 (57.6%) undergoing CVT. NOSE was associated with significantly reduced postoperative pain on the 3rd day (MD -1.1; 95% CI -1.7 to -0.5; p < 0.01), lower SSI rates (OR 0.23; 95% CI 0.08-0.73; p = 0.012), and a shorter time to pass flatus (MD -0.8; 95% CI -1.2 to -0.4; p < 0.01). However, NOSE was linked to longer operative times (MD 36.4 minutes; 95% CI 3.4-69.4; p = 0.03). No significant differences were found in hospital stay (MD -0.5 days; 95% CI -2.1 to 1.1; p = 0.57), blood loss (MD -2.1; 95% CI -9.6 to 5.4; p = 0.58), or local recurrence (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.07-3.01; p = 0.405). In conclusion, NOSE offers advantages such as reduced postoperative pain, lower SSI rates, and faster bowel recovery, with prolonged operative time as its main limitation. These findings support NOSE as a viable alternative to CVT for right-sided colon cancer without compromising safety or long-term outcomes.
微创手术是右侧结肠癌的标准方法,但传统的腹腔镜标本提取(CVT)需要额外的腹部切口,增加了术后并发症和延迟恢复的风险。自然孔标本提取(NOSE)最大限度地减少了腹部切口,潜在地改善了患者的预后。这项荟萃分析比较了鼻窦和CVT在术后并发症、手术特点和长期预后方面的差异。在PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials和Web of Science中进行了全面的文献检索,以获取截至2024年12月的研究。随机效应模型用于计算95% ci的or和平均差异(md)。使用I²统计量评估异质性。所有统计分析均使用R软件(版本4.4.1,R Foundation for statistical Computing)进行。7项倾向评分匹配研究纳入566例患者,其中240例(42.4%)接受鼻鼻窦手术,326例(57.6%)接受CVT手术。鼻鼻翼与术后第3天疼痛显著减轻相关(MD -1.1;95% CI -1.7 ~ -0.5;p < 0.01),较低的SSI发生率(OR 0.23;95% ci 0.08-0.73;p = 0.012),排气时间较短(MD -0.8;95% CI -1.2 ~ -0.4;P < 0.01)。然而,鼻翼手术与较长的手术时间相关(MD 36.4分钟;95% ci 3.4-69.4;P = 0.03)。住院时间(MD -0.5 d;95% CI -2.1 ~ 1.1;p = 0.57),失血量(MD -2.1;95% CI -9.6 ~ 5.4;p = 0.58)或局部复发(or 0.44;95% ci 0.07-3.01;P = 0.405)。综上所述,NOSE具有减轻术后疼痛、降低SSI发生率和加快肠道恢复等优点,但其主要限制是手术时间延长。这些研究结果支持鼻塞作为右侧结肠癌CVT的可行替代方案,且不影响安全性和长期预后。