Impact of the rural trauma team development course in Southwestern Ontario: change in practice and course evaluation.

Fran Priestap, Alison Armstrong, Laura Allen, Neil Parry, Daryl Gray, Richard Hilsden, Rob Leeper, Brad Moffat, Jake Pace, Kelly Vogt
{"title":"Impact of the rural trauma team development course in Southwestern Ontario: change in practice and course evaluation.","authors":"Fran Priestap, Alison Armstrong, Laura Allen, Neil Parry, Daryl Gray, Richard Hilsden, Rob Leeper, Brad Moffat, Jake Pace, Kelly Vogt","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Rural Trauma Team Development Course (RTTDC) was introduced in 1998 in response to a growing number of deaths in rural areas due to trauma. Current literature provides evidence of the effectiveness of the RTTDC in reducing delays in the trauma transfer process in the United States. London Health Sciences Centre (LHSC) implemented the RTTDC in August of 2017. The objective of this study was to evaluate its impact in the Canadian setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of referred trauma patients before and after delivery of the RTTDC was conducted. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients transferred within 3 h of arrival at referring hospital. Statistical analyses compared pre and post RTTDC groups. Following multiple imputation, multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to control for confounding between groups. A planned subgroup analysis included only patients who met trauma team activation criteria and/or had an ISS ≥16. Course attendee satisfaction was measured using the American College of Surgeons RTTDC 4th Edition Course Evaluation and the Southwest Regional Trauma Network RTTDC Evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 180 patients were included in the study. Patients had a mean age of 52.0 (20.4) years, were most often male (73.3 %), sustained a blunt injury (92.8 %) with a mean ISS of 15.8 (10.5). The proportion of patients who were transferred within 3 h of arrival at primary hospital was 48.9 % pre-RTTDC and 56.7 % post-RTTDC (p = 0.370). Hosting an RTTDC did not have a significant impact on the proportion of patients transferred within 3 h of primary hospital arrival (OR = 1.18 (0.63, 2.20)). Median time (hours) spent at a primary hospital was similar (3.1 (1.4, 4.2) vs 2.7 (1.7, 3.8), p = 0.702), as was median decision to transfer time (hours) (1.5 (0.6, 2.5) vs 1.6 (0.6, 2.5), p = 0.837). Results of the subgroup analyses were similar (N = 98). Attendee satisfaction with the RTTDC was exceedingly positive.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, participation in a one-day RTTDC did not result in a 20 % improvement in the proportion of patients being transferred from a referring hospital within 3 h. More accessible and sustainable educational outreach strategies are required to make further improvements.</p>","PeriodicalId":94042,"journal":{"name":"Injury","volume":" ","pages":"112414"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2025.112414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The Rural Trauma Team Development Course (RTTDC) was introduced in 1998 in response to a growing number of deaths in rural areas due to trauma. Current literature provides evidence of the effectiveness of the RTTDC in reducing delays in the trauma transfer process in the United States. London Health Sciences Centre (LHSC) implemented the RTTDC in August of 2017. The objective of this study was to evaluate its impact in the Canadian setting.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of referred trauma patients before and after delivery of the RTTDC was conducted. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients transferred within 3 h of arrival at referring hospital. Statistical analyses compared pre and post RTTDC groups. Following multiple imputation, multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to control for confounding between groups. A planned subgroup analysis included only patients who met trauma team activation criteria and/or had an ISS ≥16. Course attendee satisfaction was measured using the American College of Surgeons RTTDC 4th Edition Course Evaluation and the Southwest Regional Trauma Network RTTDC Evaluation.

Results: In total 180 patients were included in the study. Patients had a mean age of 52.0 (20.4) years, were most often male (73.3 %), sustained a blunt injury (92.8 %) with a mean ISS of 15.8 (10.5). The proportion of patients who were transferred within 3 h of arrival at primary hospital was 48.9 % pre-RTTDC and 56.7 % post-RTTDC (p = 0.370). Hosting an RTTDC did not have a significant impact on the proportion of patients transferred within 3 h of primary hospital arrival (OR = 1.18 (0.63, 2.20)). Median time (hours) spent at a primary hospital was similar (3.1 (1.4, 4.2) vs 2.7 (1.7, 3.8), p = 0.702), as was median decision to transfer time (hours) (1.5 (0.6, 2.5) vs 1.6 (0.6, 2.5), p = 0.837). Results of the subgroup analyses were similar (N = 98). Attendee satisfaction with the RTTDC was exceedingly positive.

Conclusion: In this study, participation in a one-day RTTDC did not result in a 20 % improvement in the proportion of patients being transferred from a referring hospital within 3 h. More accessible and sustainable educational outreach strategies are required to make further improvements.

安大略省西南部农村创伤小组发展历程的影响:实践变化与历程评价。
目的:农村创伤小组发展课程(RTTDC)于1998年推出,以应对农村地区因创伤死亡人数不断增加的情况。目前的文献证明了RTTDC在减少美国创伤转移过程中的延迟方面的有效性。伦敦健康科学中心(LHSC)于2017年8月实施了RTTDC。本研究的目的是评估其在加拿大环境中的影响。方法:对RTTDC分娩前后的转诊创伤患者进行回顾性队列研究。主要终点是到达转诊医院后3小时内转诊的患者比例。统计分析比较了RTTDC前后两组。采用多变量logistic回归分析控制组间混杂。计划的亚组分析仅包括符合创伤小组激活标准和/或ISS≥16的患者。使用美国外科医师学会RTTDC第四版课程评估和西南区域创伤网络RTTDC评估来测量课程参与者满意度。结果:共纳入180例患者。患者平均年龄52.0岁(20.4岁),以男性为主(73.3%),有钝性损伤(92.8%),平均ISS为15.8(10.5)。到达基层医院后3小时内转院的患者比例在rttdc前为48.9%,rttdc后为56.7% (p = 0.370)。举办RTTDC对到达初级医院后3小时内转院的患者比例没有显著影响(OR = 1.18(0.63, 2.20))。在基层医院度过的中位数时间(小时)相似(3.1 (1.4,4.2)vs 2.7 (1.7, 3.8), p = 0.702),决定转院的中位数时间(小时)相似(1.5 (0.6,2.5)vs 1.6 (0.6, 2.5), p = 0.837)。亚组分析结果相似(N = 98)。与会者对RTTDC的满意度非常高。结论:在本研究中,参加为期一天的RTTDC并没有导致在3小时内从转诊医院转诊的患者比例提高20%。需要更容易获得和可持续的教育推广策略来进一步改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信