Quantitative assessment of lung opacities from CT of pulmonary artery imaging data in COVID-19 patients: artificial intelligence versus radiologist.

BJR open Pub Date : 2025-04-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/bjro/tzaf008
Ann Mari Svensson, Anna Kistner, Kristina Kairaitis, G Kim Prisk, Catherine Farrow, Terence Amis, Peter D Wagner, Atul Malhotra, Piotr Harbut
{"title":"Quantitative assessment of lung opacities from CT of pulmonary artery imaging data in COVID-19 patients: artificial intelligence versus radiologist.","authors":"Ann Mari Svensson, Anna Kistner, Kristina Kairaitis, G Kim Prisk, Catherine Farrow, Terence Amis, Peter D Wagner, Atul Malhotra, Piotr Harbut","doi":"10.1093/bjro/tzaf008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) deep learning algorithms trained on non-contrast CT scans effectively detect and quantify acute COVID-19 lung involvement. Our study explored whether radiological contrast affects the accuracy of AI-measured lung opacities, potentially impacting clinical decisions. We compared lung opacity measurements from AI software with visual assessments by radiologists using CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) images of early-stage COVID-19 patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective single-centre study included 18 COVID-19 patients who underwent CTPA due to suspected pulmonary embolism. Patient demographics, clinical data, and 30-day and 90-day mortality were recorded. AI tool (Pulmonary Density Plug-in, AI-Rad Companion Chest CT, SyngoVia; Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany) was used to estimate the quantity of opacities. Visual quantitative assessments were performed independently by 2 radiologists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a positive correlation between radiologist estimations (<i>r</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.57) and between the AI data and the mean of the radiologists' estimations (<i>r</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.70). Bland-Altman plot analysis showed a mean bias of +3.06% between radiologists and -1.32% between the mean radiologist vs AI, with no outliers outside 2×SD for respective comparison.</p><p><p>The AI protocol facilitated a quantitative assessment of lung opacities and showed a strong correlation with data obtained from 2 independent radiologists, demonstrating its potential as a complementary tool in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In assessing COVID-19 lung opacities in CTPA images, AI tools trained on non-contrast images, provide comparable results to visual assessments by radiologists.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>The Pulmonary Density Plug-in enables quantitative analysis of lung opacities in COVID-19 patients using contrast-enhanced CT images, potentially streamlining clinical workflows and supporting timely decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":72419,"journal":{"name":"BJR open","volume":"7 1","pages":"tzaf008"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12077292/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJR open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjro/tzaf008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Artificial intelligence (AI) deep learning algorithms trained on non-contrast CT scans effectively detect and quantify acute COVID-19 lung involvement. Our study explored whether radiological contrast affects the accuracy of AI-measured lung opacities, potentially impacting clinical decisions. We compared lung opacity measurements from AI software with visual assessments by radiologists using CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) images of early-stage COVID-19 patients.

Methods: This prospective single-centre study included 18 COVID-19 patients who underwent CTPA due to suspected pulmonary embolism. Patient demographics, clinical data, and 30-day and 90-day mortality were recorded. AI tool (Pulmonary Density Plug-in, AI-Rad Companion Chest CT, SyngoVia; Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany) was used to estimate the quantity of opacities. Visual quantitative assessments were performed independently by 2 radiologists.

Results: There was a positive correlation between radiologist estimations (r 2 = 0.57) and between the AI data and the mean of the radiologists' estimations (r 2 = 0.70). Bland-Altman plot analysis showed a mean bias of +3.06% between radiologists and -1.32% between the mean radiologist vs AI, with no outliers outside 2×SD for respective comparison.

The AI protocol facilitated a quantitative assessment of lung opacities and showed a strong correlation with data obtained from 2 independent radiologists, demonstrating its potential as a complementary tool in clinical practice.

Conclusion: In assessing COVID-19 lung opacities in CTPA images, AI tools trained on non-contrast images, provide comparable results to visual assessments by radiologists.

Advances in knowledge: The Pulmonary Density Plug-in enables quantitative analysis of lung opacities in COVID-19 patients using contrast-enhanced CT images, potentially streamlining clinical workflows and supporting timely decision-making.

COVID-19患者CT肺动脉成像数据肺混浊的定量评估:人工智能与放射科医生
目的:人工智能(AI)深度学习算法训练非对比CT扫描有效检测和量化急性COVID-19肺部受累。我们的研究探讨了放射造影剂是否会影响人工智能测量肺混浊的准确性,从而潜在地影响临床决策。我们将人工智能软件的肺不透明测量结果与放射科医生使用CT肺血管造影(CTPA)图像对早期COVID-19患者的视觉评估进行了比较。方法:本前瞻性单中心研究纳入了18例因疑似肺栓塞而行CTPA的COVID-19患者。记录患者人口统计、临床数据以及30天和90天死亡率。人工智能工具(肺密度插件,AI- rad伴胸CT, SyngoVia;使用Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany)来估计不透明的数量。视觉定量评估由2名放射科医生独立进行。结果:放射科医生的估计值与人工智能数据与放射科医生估计值的平均值呈正相关(r 2 = 0.57),人工智能数据与放射科医生估计值的平均值呈正相关(r 2 = 0.70)。Bland-Altman图分析显示,放射科医生与人工智能之间的平均偏差为+3.06%,平均放射科医生与人工智能之间的平均偏差为-1.32%,除了2×SD之外没有异常值。人工智能方案促进了肺混浊的定量评估,并与2名独立放射科医生获得的数据显示出很强的相关性,证明了其作为临床实践补充工具的潜力。结论:在评估CTPA图像中的COVID-19肺部混浊物时,经过非对比图像训练的人工智能工具提供的结果与放射科医生的视觉评估相当。知识进步:肺密度插件可以使用增强CT图像定量分析COVID-19患者的肺部混浊,从而简化临床工作流程并支持及时决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信