Xin Tong, Dongfang You, Fang Shao, Mengyi Lu, Yang Zhao
{"title":"A Novel Adaptive Design Approach for Early-Phase Clinical Trials to Optimize Vaccine Dosage.","authors":"Xin Tong, Dongfang You, Fang Shao, Mengyi Lu, Yang Zhao","doi":"10.46234/ccdcw2025.097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Vaccines are a cornerstone of global health, with their efficacy and safety dependent on appropriate dosage determination. Early-phase vaccination trials face significant challenges due to minimal toxicity and nonmonotonic dose response curves, creating a major obstacle in vaccine development. To address this gap, we propose a novel Bayesian phase I/II trial design for dose response curves exhibiting plateau or unimodal patterns to identify the optimal biological dose (OBD), effectively balancing efficacy and toxicity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employ a logistic dose-efficacy design that makes dose-escalation and de-escalation decisions while simultaneously considering both efficacy and safety parameters. Extensive simulation studies evaluate the performance of this design.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparative analyses with commonly used vaccine dose-finding designs demonstrate that our method excels in identifying the optimal toxicity-efficacy trade-off, offering both simplicity and accuracy. Sensitivity analyses across various prior settings confirm the robustness and efficiency of our approach. Additionally, our design provides a user-friendly framework for clinicians, with superior operating performance compared to existing designs, particularly in terms of accuracy and robustness.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our innovative Bayesian design represents a significant advancement in addressing the inherent challenges of early-phase vaccination clinical trials, offering improved accuracy and efficacy in vaccine dosage determination.</p>","PeriodicalId":69039,"journal":{"name":"中国疾病预防控制中心周报","volume":"7 17","pages":"592-598"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12075483/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国疾病预防控制中心周报","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46234/ccdcw2025.097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Vaccines are a cornerstone of global health, with their efficacy and safety dependent on appropriate dosage determination. Early-phase vaccination trials face significant challenges due to minimal toxicity and nonmonotonic dose response curves, creating a major obstacle in vaccine development. To address this gap, we propose a novel Bayesian phase I/II trial design for dose response curves exhibiting plateau or unimodal patterns to identify the optimal biological dose (OBD), effectively balancing efficacy and toxicity.
Methods: We employ a logistic dose-efficacy design that makes dose-escalation and de-escalation decisions while simultaneously considering both efficacy and safety parameters. Extensive simulation studies evaluate the performance of this design.
Results: Comparative analyses with commonly used vaccine dose-finding designs demonstrate that our method excels in identifying the optimal toxicity-efficacy trade-off, offering both simplicity and accuracy. Sensitivity analyses across various prior settings confirm the robustness and efficiency of our approach. Additionally, our design provides a user-friendly framework for clinicians, with superior operating performance compared to existing designs, particularly in terms of accuracy and robustness.
Discussion: Our innovative Bayesian design represents a significant advancement in addressing the inherent challenges of early-phase vaccination clinical trials, offering improved accuracy and efficacy in vaccine dosage determination.