{"title":"Investigating the Independent and Combined Effects of Startle and Surprise in a Simulated Flight Task.","authors":"Alexandre Duchevet, Jean-Paul Imbert, Jérémie Garcia, Benoît Lamirault, Mickaël Causse","doi":"10.1177/00187208251342100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveWe aimed to characterize the impact of startle and surprise, both independently and in combination, on subjective feelings, behavior (task performance and gaze behavior), and several physiological parameters.BackgroundThe effects of startle and surprise are known to affect pilots' cognitive performance, with potential impact on safety. Startle and surprise can occur either together or independently, yet no studies have experimentally distinguished their specific effects.MethodParticipants (<i>n</i> = 45) were each assigned to one of the three conditions while performing the MATB-II task. In the startle condition, participants were subjected to an expected loud sound. In the surprise condition, an unexpected reverse video effect was applied to the experimental interface. In the combination condition, participants were exposed to both stimuli simultaneously.ResultsSurprise was associated with an increase in skin conductance without affecting performance. In contrast, startle was marked by a decline in performance on the communication sub-task, increased skin conductance and heart rate, and a narrowing of attention. When startle and surprise were combined, the results mirrored those of startle alone but included a stronger feeling of startle and surprise, and a more prolonged heart rate increase.ConclusionStartle and surprise combined yielded more numerous significant effects on subjective, behavioral, and physiological measures than startle and surprise independently.ApplicationIdentifying the specific impacts of startle and surprise could pave the way for their automatic detection using artificial intelligence. Safety could be enhanced through the design of specific countermeasures to help the crew cope with such states.</p>","PeriodicalId":56333,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors","volume":" ","pages":"187208251342100"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208251342100","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ObjectiveWe aimed to characterize the impact of startle and surprise, both independently and in combination, on subjective feelings, behavior (task performance and gaze behavior), and several physiological parameters.BackgroundThe effects of startle and surprise are known to affect pilots' cognitive performance, with potential impact on safety. Startle and surprise can occur either together or independently, yet no studies have experimentally distinguished their specific effects.MethodParticipants (n = 45) were each assigned to one of the three conditions while performing the MATB-II task. In the startle condition, participants were subjected to an expected loud sound. In the surprise condition, an unexpected reverse video effect was applied to the experimental interface. In the combination condition, participants were exposed to both stimuli simultaneously.ResultsSurprise was associated with an increase in skin conductance without affecting performance. In contrast, startle was marked by a decline in performance on the communication sub-task, increased skin conductance and heart rate, and a narrowing of attention. When startle and surprise were combined, the results mirrored those of startle alone but included a stronger feeling of startle and surprise, and a more prolonged heart rate increase.ConclusionStartle and surprise combined yielded more numerous significant effects on subjective, behavioral, and physiological measures than startle and surprise independently.ApplicationIdentifying the specific impacts of startle and surprise could pave the way for their automatic detection using artificial intelligence. Safety could be enhanced through the design of specific countermeasures to help the crew cope with such states.
期刊介绍:
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society publishes peer-reviewed scientific studies in human factors/ergonomics that present theoretical and practical advances concerning the relationship between people and technologies, tools, environments, and systems. Papers published in Human Factors leverage fundamental knowledge of human capabilities and limitations – and the basic understanding of cognitive, physical, behavioral, physiological, social, developmental, affective, and motivational aspects of human performance – to yield design principles; enhance training, selection, and communication; and ultimately improve human-system interfaces and sociotechnical systems that lead to safer and more effective outcomes.