Investigating the Independent and Combined Effects of Startle and Surprise in a Simulated Flight Task.

IF 2.9 3区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Alexandre Duchevet, Jean-Paul Imbert, Jérémie Garcia, Benoît Lamirault, Mickaël Causse
{"title":"Investigating the Independent and Combined Effects of Startle and Surprise in a Simulated Flight Task.","authors":"Alexandre Duchevet, Jean-Paul Imbert, Jérémie Garcia, Benoît Lamirault, Mickaël Causse","doi":"10.1177/00187208251342100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveWe aimed to characterize the impact of startle and surprise, both independently and in combination, on subjective feelings, behavior (task performance and gaze behavior), and several physiological parameters.BackgroundThe effects of startle and surprise are known to affect pilots' cognitive performance, with potential impact on safety. Startle and surprise can occur either together or independently, yet no studies have experimentally distinguished their specific effects.MethodParticipants (<i>n</i> = 45) were each assigned to one of the three conditions while performing the MATB-II task. In the startle condition, participants were subjected to an expected loud sound. In the surprise condition, an unexpected reverse video effect was applied to the experimental interface. In the combination condition, participants were exposed to both stimuli simultaneously.ResultsSurprise was associated with an increase in skin conductance without affecting performance. In contrast, startle was marked by a decline in performance on the communication sub-task, increased skin conductance and heart rate, and a narrowing of attention. When startle and surprise were combined, the results mirrored those of startle alone but included a stronger feeling of startle and surprise, and a more prolonged heart rate increase.ConclusionStartle and surprise combined yielded more numerous significant effects on subjective, behavioral, and physiological measures than startle and surprise independently.ApplicationIdentifying the specific impacts of startle and surprise could pave the way for their automatic detection using artificial intelligence. Safety could be enhanced through the design of specific countermeasures to help the crew cope with such states.</p>","PeriodicalId":56333,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors","volume":" ","pages":"187208251342100"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208251342100","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveWe aimed to characterize the impact of startle and surprise, both independently and in combination, on subjective feelings, behavior (task performance and gaze behavior), and several physiological parameters.BackgroundThe effects of startle and surprise are known to affect pilots' cognitive performance, with potential impact on safety. Startle and surprise can occur either together or independently, yet no studies have experimentally distinguished their specific effects.MethodParticipants (n = 45) were each assigned to one of the three conditions while performing the MATB-II task. In the startle condition, participants were subjected to an expected loud sound. In the surprise condition, an unexpected reverse video effect was applied to the experimental interface. In the combination condition, participants were exposed to both stimuli simultaneously.ResultsSurprise was associated with an increase in skin conductance without affecting performance. In contrast, startle was marked by a decline in performance on the communication sub-task, increased skin conductance and heart rate, and a narrowing of attention. When startle and surprise were combined, the results mirrored those of startle alone but included a stronger feeling of startle and surprise, and a more prolonged heart rate increase.ConclusionStartle and surprise combined yielded more numerous significant effects on subjective, behavioral, and physiological measures than startle and surprise independently.ApplicationIdentifying the specific impacts of startle and surprise could pave the way for their automatic detection using artificial intelligence. Safety could be enhanced through the design of specific countermeasures to help the crew cope with such states.

惊吓和惊奇在模拟飞行任务中的独立和联合效应研究。
目的:我们旨在描述惊吓和惊讶对主观感觉、行为(任务表现和凝视行为)和几个生理参数的影响,无论是单独的还是联合的。众所周知,惊吓和惊喜会影响飞行员的认知表现,并对安全产生潜在影响。惊吓和惊讶既可以同时发生,也可以单独发生,但还没有实验研究区分出它们的具体影响。方法参与者(n = 45)在执行MATB-II任务时被分配到三种条件中的一种。在惊吓条件下,参与者受到预期的大声声音。在意外条件下,在实验界面上施加了意想不到的反向视频效果。在组合条件下,参与者同时暴露于两种刺激。结果惊讶与皮肤电导的增加有关,但不影响表现。相比之下,受惊吓的人在沟通子任务上的表现下降,皮肤电导和心率增加,注意力缩小。当惊吓和惊讶结合在一起时,结果与单独惊吓的结果相同,但包括更强烈的惊吓和惊讶感,以及更持久的心率增加。结论惊吓和惊吓联合使用对受试者主观、行为和生理指标的显著影响要大于惊吓和惊吓单独使用。识别惊吓和惊讶的具体影响可以为使用人工智能进行自动检测铺平道路。安全可以通过特定对策的设计来增强,以帮助船员应对这种状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Factors
Human Factors 管理科学-行为科学
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society publishes peer-reviewed scientific studies in human factors/ergonomics that present theoretical and practical advances concerning the relationship between people and technologies, tools, environments, and systems. Papers published in Human Factors leverage fundamental knowledge of human capabilities and limitations – and the basic understanding of cognitive, physical, behavioral, physiological, social, developmental, affective, and motivational aspects of human performance – to yield design principles; enhance training, selection, and communication; and ultimately improve human-system interfaces and sociotechnical systems that lead to safer and more effective outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信